In this paper I am going to discuss the rhetorical appeals, as well as the argumentative structure, audience and purpose set forth by George W. Bush in his September 27 speech in Flagstaff, Arizona. More specifically I will refer to the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos and logos, and explain how they are used to gain the support and attention of the audience and further the further the purpose of the speech. As I explain these appeals I will also give an insight into the argumentative structure and why it is apparent in this particular speech. President Bush’s speech was directed towards an audience of northern Arizonan republican supporters. Bush continuously uses the rhetorical appeal of pathos, the appeal to the …show more content…
It is another great example the rhetorical appeal of pathos. Again in an emotional appeal to the nation Bush tries to sum up the general feelings of his audience when he refers to the people who lost their lives on Flight 93 while working to save others. Bush recalls the events by exclaiming, “It was a sad, sad moment...”. The use of the word “sad” was a simple but effective way to convey emotion to the audience and rally it to support the speaker. Bush uses the first few paragraphs of his speech to introduce several of the people he is working with. The appeals he makes in these lines are excellent examples of ethos, the rhetorical appeal to character. Bush continuously comments on the character of the people around him. He speaks of them as if he knows them very well, almost like old friends. Through this appeal the audience became able to relate to these people and learn a little bit about their character. Some of the people mentioned have large families and are of an honest and selfless nature. Because the speaker’s purpose is to gain support from the constituents for the candidates represented, the appeal to the character of the candidates is a crucial tool that becomes extremely vital to the swaying of the audience to the purposes of the speaker. In the case of this speech, the appeals to
Another way Clinton uses pathos is when he tries to comfort the people who have lost loved ones by saying, “You have lost too much, but you have not lost everything.” Clinton lets the audience know that they have people that will help them through this hard time and they have the nation behind them: “You have certainly not lost America, for we will stand with you for as many tomorrows as it takes.” Clinton ultimately reaches his goal of comforting his audience by using ethos and pathos strategies throughout his speech.
I think that his ethos goes up as a speaker. The other proof in this speech pathos means to persuade an audience by engaging to their own emotions. Speakers can use pathos to get some compassion and connect with all of their religious emotions. One example in this religious speech is when Mitt Romney refers to the prayer example at the end of his speech. All these people who are praying with different sorts of faith and many different religious views all came united as one and love America like we are supposed to do.
In president Bush’s 9/11 speech he uses pathos,logos,and ethos. President Bush uses little logos in his speech. In Bush’s speech he uses lots of pathos to create emotion about the tragic events that just happened in America. In his speech he also uses varied word choice by like saying our tot put himself on the same level has the American citizens. In first paragraph Bush talks about the deadly attacks that just happened in America.
The first rhetorical appeal used is Pathos. This is the rhetorical appeal he uses the most and can be found throughout his whole speech. Pathos is referred
Once he begins to appeal to the emotions of the audience, they forget that he has no credibility and are roused by his compelling arguments. He began the conversation by saying, “we’re gonna spend as much time as we need today” making sure that the audience knew they were the center of attention for as long as needed. Continuing in his opening remarks, Trump flattered the audience by saying he won the south states because “the evangelicals were so incredible.” Trump indulges the conscience of the audience with his flattery. The evangelicals that were listening felt important and crucial to the Trump campaign. At the end of the conversation Trump went as far to say that the evangelicals are “the most powerful group in the county” and that “there’s nothing more important to him than this group of people here.” This was just another dip into the audience’s ego and another vote for Trump on the
We will discuss the elements of a rhetorical triangle when applied to a rhetorical artifact, as well as their importance within criticism. The basis of the system of rhetoric per Aristotle is, “The faculty of observing in any given situation the available means of persuasion .” Rhetoric’s purpose as it is associated with speech, is to apply certain influence on the conduct of the audience. This means that President Obamas intention should be to evoke a certain emotion from the audience. This is done in such a way that the audience agrees with, or is persuaded in favor of the person giving the speech. If the rhetor, in this case President Obama, fails to apply influence upon the audience, this begs the question of purpose and intent of the speech. There are several methods that are used to survey the intent of a speech and the message intended to an audience. One of the first and very early methods used is Neo-Aristotelian Criticism. This is a form of criticism that was developed in the initial stages of rhetorical criticism. It involves three principles such as the situation, the speaker, and the
Despite the several terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania, America remained strong and united. In the speech “Address to the Nation on the Terrorist Attacks”, George W. Bush, addresses the terrorist attack of September eleventh to let the citizens know they can overcome a tragic and mournful incident by remaining unified and a powerful country. The primary audience are the citizens and the family members of the ones who had died or were involved in the incident. The secondary audience are the terrorists to let them know American’s are not scared and will stand together against them. Bush uses ethos, pathos, and figurative language to encourage the citizens to be stronger, united, and feel safe.
Rhetoric is found virtually everywhere, from billboards to commercial ads on television, it is a part of the 21st century’s daily routine. Communication thrives on rhetoric because it is the foundation of opinion. Without discussion or opinions, life will become dull and uninteresting. Political debates towards the end of presidential elections are predominately a few of the greatest examples of this. By the end of elections, a majority of people have lost interest in the repetition of each candidate, with rhetoric, people become more inclined to tune into their television to listen to two candidates debate.
For instance, Obama said “Sasha and Malia, I love you both so much, and you have earned the new puppy that’s coming with us to the White House” in his victory speech (2008). The direct speech to his daughters and the lively expression, “the new puppy” have created intimacy between the American people and this newly elected president. Lastly, ethos is for the speaker or writer to win the credibility or trust from audiences or readers, which is maintained by the tone and style revealed in the speech or writing. Many speakers or writers use first-person narration, and Obama is not an exception.
President Donald Trump announced an extremely important policy that he wanted to an enact… through the popular social media site called Twitter. A summarization of what his tweet means is as follows; Transgender individuals are a disruption to the victory of the military. This message provoked outrage and, consequently, little approval nationwide. In order to formulate his message, President Donald Trump used the tool of rhetorical appeals. As stated by Doug Downs, Aristotle observed that people usually made three kinds of appeals: to logic, to emotion, and to a rhetor’s credibility (Downs 469). Emotional appeals, also called pathos, toy with a reader’s feelings, through the use of manipulative claims, in order to convince the reader of something
(Obama, par.6). It means that he is relying on his ethical appeal and has a lot of experience in his life to gain credibility with his knowledge of social issues that strongly affects our society today. He also appeals to Pathos, because President Obama uses emotional appeal to change the thoughts and feelings of his listeners. President Obama talks about the issue of races; it makes the listeners stimulate their emotions.
There is not one rhetorical strategy used in this speech as ethos, pathos, and logos are all seen. Obama appeals to emotion very successfully reaching people affected by racial issues. Obama successfully uses allusion and repetition, along with personal anecdotes to relate with the audience. Ethos is a rhetorical strategy used to appeal to
The final two rhetorical strategies I found in “The Evil Empire” speech given by Ronald Reagan was the usage of pathos and logos. An example of pathos in this speech is when Reagan refers to the abortion matter that was taking place in this time period. He states that, “Unless and until it can be proven that the unborn child is not a living entity, then its right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness must be protected” (Reagan 4). The use of this sentence is to appeal to the audience’s emotions and get the audience to start thinking about what abortion really is. Reagan wants the American people to realize what
President Kennedy addressed the nation to express his displeasure after the U.S. steel companies raised steel prices by 3.5 percent. Since the nation was in the process of rebounding from a recession, Kennedy tried his absolute best to keep the steel prices the same and the wages to be steady, which would benefit the American people. The increase in prices however, hurt the people instead of helping them, as people consumed more and more steel at the time. In his speech, President Kennedy expresses his displeasure with the price increase and how it hurts not only America, but the entire world. The proper use of Pathos also emphasizes the disappointment Kennedy felt.
Presidents Obama and Trump engage readers through emotional connectedness, and use tone to establish a relationship between themselves and their audiences. Obama’s tone is reassuring and heartening throughout his speech effectively creating a powerful bond. For example, Obama states “And no act of hate or terror will ever change who we are or the values that make us Americans” In Obama’s statement, he reassures the public that no shooting will allow the values of Americans to be destroyed. Such words heartens Americans to continue their values