preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of War Against Boys

Decent Essays

In the article “War Against Boys?”, I noticed two common and reappearing rhetorical appeals, pathos and logos. The reason I chose both of these appeals is because of how Michael Kimmel thinks about how gender inequality affects boys and how this is affecting boys education in lower and higher institutions. Pathos played a huge part in this essay because of the emotional and mental impact on boys through discrimination from the school system. One example of pathos being shown is when feminism was mentioned pathologizing boyhood making boys think what is normal , another way pathos was being shown is when gender stereotyping was stated to be hurting both girls and boys (Michael 522-523). Like pathos, logos was also seen throughout the article as well. The first logos that was shown was when statistician Tom Mortensen stated that “ the graduation line 2068 will be all females”(Michael 522). Another example of logos was the statistics of gender imbalance throughout the higher educational system.
Case studies is the main theme for Michael's argument as he did use multiple studies to prove a point or show percentages of ratios about men and women in education . Throughout this article, emotional struggles and feeling of discrimination for boys was shown many times, this gives Michael great support for his views on the war against boys. In the article, feminism was thought to be the cause of boys not being successful. Feminist had ideas and had goals to help future generations of

Get Access