preview

Rhetorical Analysis

Decent Essays

Content Introduction and Conclusion: When she started the speech, she fumbled over her attention getter, but I would place fault upon being an English learner rather than being unprepared. Her opening line and credibility led her well onto her main point of recycling. I feel as though her preview was not so much a preview as it was an awkward transitional piece into her first main point. The conclusion was a good ending to the speech and wrapped it up nicely. There was a nice mini review of the points which melded well with her final thoughts. No complaints here. Body: The main points were clear, with the transitions feeling a bit lacking. She spent an equal amount of time on the body paragraphs but they were way too short, as the full speech fell a minute behind the minimum required presentation time. The was no slang, but there were some grammar and syntax issues, which are not completely the fault of the speaker, but are the fault of subject-verb agreement in native language. I would be lucky to do so well in a second language. She used effective imagery with her rhetorical questions, but could have done better imagery application with the soft information. …show more content…

That line of “evidence” left me with more questions than answers. She had a variety of hard and soft information, with the anecdotal evidence feeling a bit more practiced and well-rounded. I could interpret the evidence, and I think it came across easily at most points. Overall, the information itself was good, but the fault of the feeling of listed information lied in

Get Access