Revolt Of 1381 Research Paper

DBQ: German peasant’s revolt “We will not allow ourselves here after to be oppressed by our lords but will let them demand only what is just and proper” (doc 2). The German peasant’s revolt in 1524 was largely due to the unjust treatment and laboring of the peasants. In turn the peasants showed their displeasement by banding together and pillaged the homes of the wealthy across the Holy Roman Empire. The conflict shows and unstable system where a better alternative could have been reached with better cooperation from both sides.

ran out of their palace while their king is gone. They are being ran out by suitors who

According to Leonhard von Eck, the peasants began the revolt in the name of Martin Luther and his belief, Lutheranism. He argues that they were following Lutheran teaching to inhibit the impeding cruelty of the nobility, and therefore their actions were religiously justified (Doc. 1). Similar to Doc. 3, this document states that the peasants wanted equality. Doc. 1 sets forth the peasants’ beliefs in the word of God and the Gospel giving them the right to repress the nobility, whereas Doc. 3 gives their claim on Christ’s desires and their need for release from serfdom. In agreement with von Eck, Sebastian Lotzer expresses that the peasants were obligated to rebel to have a mutual pact with the nobility. They demanded equal treatment and in conclusion, like before, they were justifying their deeds as their right (Doc. 2). The fact that Lotzer, a lay preacher, would demand their rights from the nobility is understandable considering that the peasants believed God gave them the right to do so. They believed it was God’s hope that they rebel against a group or society that was doing them wrong. In accordance with Lotzer’s argument,

Lorenz Fries stresses this anger in his report to the Archbishop of Wurzburg, as he describes the wealth’s inability to share their profits and income with the poor (Doc 8). The peasants believe they are entitled to a share of wealth because all are considered to be brothers in the public eye of God. Considering Fries’s report is secret, it most likely states his candid opinions (Pov3). Although economic oppression is a crucial factor in pushing the revolt, Protestant influence is responsible for the revolt as well.

To begin with, their careless actions led to Shay’s rebellion and which 1500 farmers protested. The evidence shows,“We have thought it best to tell you about some of the main causes of the recent risings of the people and also of their actions”. The farmers had rebelled and there were 1500 of them protesting, which had led to careless actions.

The serf provided material, military aid, and advice for the lord’s counsel. The lord provided protection for the serf, maintenance, and aid when the vassal requested. The land of the vassal, holder of he land through homage, was broken into strips of land called fief. After the homage ceremony, the lord then granted a fief to the serf. A man could then be a vassal to multiple lords and a lord could obtain multiple vassals, which thus introduced subinfeudation. This caused great complexity especially if the lords had different views and the vassals were divided. In this case, a contract was initiated swearing a serf to the main lord.

The legend of the chupacabra has been a legend in mexico for a long time. I would have to say that this is my absolute favorite legend. I first heard this legend when I was at disney world at ten years of age. I hadn't thought anything of it, but when I saw a fake news clip about it I became very interested in this new creature. Conversely, I started watching paranormal phenomenons and el chupacabra would always be stated. Consequently, when I went to mexico on a cruise the year before last, you heard about this creature at farms and anywhere a chicken was, there were several reports of sightings.

Shays ' Rebellion, an armed uprising in Massachusetts during 1786 and 1787. Revolutionary War veteran Daniel Shays led four thousand rebels in

Peasants were members of the lowest class, those who work. They were the most common class. They were the millers, blacksmiths, butchers, carpenters, farmers, and other trades people. Peasant women in particular, spent much of their time taking care of children, making clothes, and cooking meals. They also tended gardens, took care of animals by tending chicken, shearing sheep, and milking cows (Cels 16). Within peasants, there were two main groups of people, the serfs and the freemen. Both were employed by the lords. And serfs were people that paid more fees, and had less rights. Freemen on the other hand paid less fees and had more rights than serfs (Noiret). While freemen could leave the manor when at whim, serfs were not allowed to leave

Before the time where an urge to revolt arose, the wealthy had the power. As part of their power, they had to keep things running smoothly. Unfortunately, their ideas of the world as a better place was making the working class do all the labor and in return giving them the least amount of reward possible so they could take most of the revenue into their own hands. The upper class made decisions for the feeble lower class and then it was up to these unstable people to produce the result desired. As far as the bourgeoisie were concerned, there was not anything wrong in the way they were going about life. This was one of the biggest problems at the time. The bourgeoisie

Henry the Plantagenet (John’s and Richard’s father) was the one who understood this most. He went out to conquer lands for his empire. He inherited some land from France, but wanted more so he married Eleanor of Aquitaine to be able to rule over Aquitaine. Soon, he became King of England so his empire grew and so did his family.

7. The causes of the peasants’ uprising known as the Great Fear of 1789 was the peasants impatience and want to take matters into their own hands because they were furious with being forced to deal with the most of the taxation, the church tithes, and the nobles abusing their privileges effecting their lives. The cause that pushed them over the edge to begin the uprisings was the rise in the price of bread. The outcomes of the uprising were the destroying of feudal documents, enclosed lands raided, and most importantly the Nation Assembly having no choice but to issue a decree on August 4, 1789 that abolished all noble privileges including the hunting rights, the fees for legal cases judged in a lord’s court, forcing peasants to work on roads, along with the abolishment of tithes.

4) Key facts: The case is about a person named Jesse Williams who was a chain smoker and severely addicted to smoking who died of lung cancer. On the other hand, his widowed wife said that Williams died because Philips Morris purposely led him to smoke because of their fraudulent advertisements and sponsorships attracted William towards smoking their brand. The widow claimed that the brand Philip Morris was a fraud; they used to interpret very dangerous cigarettes as less dangerous, which perhaps attracted a lot of customers and market share. The widow filed a lawsuit against the company for negligence.

Are some people naturally born “bad” in society’s eyes? No, it is not possible to be born bad scientifically. How kids are after they grow up is because of how the parents have taught their children. The violence of kids is portrayed in many different ways such as physical, mental, emotional, and sexual. I personally believe that kids are not born naturally bad.

Life as a serf or peasant was not easy. Serfs were bound to their lord's land and required to do services for him. Although they could not be sold like slaves, they had no freedom (Ellis and Esler 219-244). Peasants farmed for the goods that the lord and his manor needed. They went through difficult hardship because of this. Peasants were heavily taxed and had to provide for themselves the goods that they needed (“The Middle Ages”). According to the medieval law, the peasants were not considered to 'belong to' themselves (“The Middle Ages”). Although serfs were peasants and had relatively the same duties and similar rights, what differentiated a peasant from a serf was that a peasant was not bound to the land (“The Middle Ages”). Peasants had no schooling and no knowledge of the outside world (Ellis and Esler 219-244). They rarely traveled more than a couple miles outside of their villages. All members of a peasant family, including children, tended crops, farmed, and did some sort of work to help out (Ellis and Esler 224). Very few peasants lived past the age of 35 because of hunger in the winter and the easy development and transmission of disease (Ellis and Esler 224).