preview

Reverend Hale's Paradox In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

Decent Essays

A paradox can be described as a “seemingly absurd or self-contradictory statement”. In the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller, the townsfolk of Salem, Maine begin to take measures to protect the people when signs of witchcraft begin to appear. They create a central court to conduct trial against the guilty, try to sort out the witches from the innocent, and call in professional Reverend Hale to use his knowledge and enthusiasm to heal the minister’s daughter, Betty, as well as oversee hearings in the court. This eventually creates a paradoxical theme as explained by the quote: “that which they created to protect themselves ultimately destroyed them.” This is because the court begins to kill innocent people and let the guilty live, random townsfolk are accused of witchcraft, and Reverend Hale abandons his ideas and instructs the accused to lie to save their lives. All of these reasons cause the trials fall to chaos and the court to ultimately fall apart. First, the people of Salem create a court to protect the townspeople from witchcraft. The court’s purpose is to put the guilty “witches” on trial, but eventually it begins to put innocent people on trial and let the …show more content…

In the beginning of the play, Hale brings his books to see Betty to try and heal her from the Devil as well as be a participant of the court. Throughout the novel his enthusiasm wanes as he begins to tell the townsfolk on trial to lie to save themselves. Eventually, he gives up and totally leaves the court as is stated by Hale on page 122, “I denounce these proceedings, I quit this court!” Reverend Hale’s transformation from a good citizen who wants to use his knowledge to help the people of Salem, to an overseer of the court who tells people to lie to save themselves makes him a prime example of the paradox: “that which they created to protect themselves ultimately destroyed

Get Access