preview

Reunification Therapy Case Study

Satisfactory Essays

LINE CONCERNING REUNIFICATION THERAPY 1. On March 10, 2017, this Court instructed both parties to enter a line within 30 days to inform the Court of the status of reunification therapy ordered by this Court. 2. On March 20, 2017, the Defendant contacted the Plaintiff and her attorney via email to inquire as to the status of the reunification therapy. Neither the Plaintiff nor her attorney responded, which is typical of their response to any inquiry the Defendant makes of them concerning his daughter. 3. Sometime later on in March, the Defendant attempted to contact the Plaintiff to inquire as to the status of reunification therapy and ended up leaving voice mail of which the Plaintiff has refused to respond. 4. On March 4, 2017, the Defendant …show more content…

The Defendant has no knowledge as to the actual stated purpose of these appointments. Therefore, the Defendant has no knowledge as to whether or not these appointments are for the purposes of reunification or if they are for other reason for which his daughter was already seeing the therapist for. 6. The Defendant has not been contacted by Kaiser or by the Plaintiff concerning any appointments for him to participate concerning reunification therapy. 7. The Defendant has attempted several times attempted to contact the Plaintiff concerning reunification therapy and the status of his daughter. The Plaintiff has refused to return any of his phone calls and has refused to inform him about anything concerning his daughter. 8. This Court’s order for Reunification Therapy has done nothing to reunify the Defendant with his daughter, but has instead given the Plaintiff another means to further cause harm to the Defendant’s relationship with his daughter. I SOLEMNLY SWEAR AND AFFIRM UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE AFOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE, AND BELIEF.

Get Access