Republican Argument Analysis

As Joe said we going to discuss the readings upload on the course webside. In order to have a intersting discusion we will send you a sheet with question every week. They will be a guideline, so the answers have to be main ideas/facts or anothers question that you may have during the readings. Please write them and share it during the discussion.

The nation has come to know the GOP as a party that embodies the essence of conservative America. One characteristic of US conservatism is forgetfulness or strategic avoidance of sensitive issues that date back as recently as six months. Everything with the GOP is yesterday, today and a conservative future.

In the newspaper The New York Times, an article was recently published pertaining to the upcoming 2016 election titled, “Don’t Like the Candidates? Vote Anyway.” The author, Adam Grant, forged this persuasive-argumentative selection to convince readers to vote, despite both candidates lacking in several areas(3). Grant makes good use of all three of Aristotle’s ideas to construe a well thought out and convincing message to his audience. His ideas are executed in an excellent manner. Furthermore, not one of Aristotle’s ideas is used more than any other. This helps to streamline his main points, and create an even harmony within the article. Grant’s article effectively argues his point that people should vote no matter what, with the use of Aristotle’s three rhetorical ideas in a balanced fashion.

The title is At Republican Debate, Candidates Are Likely to Set Sights on Ted Cruz, written by Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman issued on December 14, 2015. Many controversial topics have defined the previous Republican debates with Donald Trump currently leading in the polls. This article characterizes possible tactics for the final Republican debate. The subject matter of this article deals with potential Republican presidential candidates. Candidates must attack Donald Trump if they want a chance of taking him over in the polls. Some facts are based on state reporting and opinions on debate tactics. The editor does attempt to appeal to his readers' emotions by highlighting voter's concerns and issues including terrorism,

In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.

1. Short answer (Weeks 9, 11, 12): Compare and contrast the main arguments of Mohanty, Sen, and Liederman. How are they similar to one another? How are they different from each other?

After months of insults and criticizing the front-runner Donald Trump, his rivals decided to try another tactic to derail his status- nothing.

The very first big idea that I noticed throughout this chapter was the idea that we have to have a process to make controversy creative and productive. For example, when reading the section labeled process of controversy in figure 8.2, I found that when we are struggling with controversy it is important for us to use this conflict for the greater good of the decision we are trying to make. This section also helped demonstrate with figure 8.3 just how controversy kicks off. Within doing the exercises specifically exercise 8.2 I learned a lot about how I personally address controversy having this exercise tell me exactly how I deal with controversy made me feel good because that is exactly how I believed I addressed controversy. However, having a somewhat of an exam confirm that was very reassuring and when I read further on into the chapter I realized

My initial reaction to Limbaugh’s claim that “feminism was established so that unattractive women could have easier access to the mainstream of society" was mixed when I first read it. Limbaugh’s opinion of feminism is based on what is termed as popularized or degraded. These two terms are really umbrella terms used for various movements and theories which support equality for women. Not all of the theories about feminism are acceptable in our society today. Limbaugh’s comments make a generalization about feminism. The comments made by Limbaugh, to me, are offensive and without consideration.

This paper is based on the Republican point of view on various issues such as abortion, taxes, immigration, military spending, and gun control. A Republican’s point of view on abortion is rooted around the idea that an unborn child is legally considered an individual and has the right to live. A Republican believes that taxation should be lowered to help promote big businesses and the wealthy. Republicans believe that all immigrants should have to be a legal citizen before they can live in the United States. Military spending is viewed by the Republican party as an important need. They believe we should have a high budget for our military. The Republicans believe that every American has the right to own, carry, and use a firearm.

In the wake of the death of Antonin Scalia, the Supreme Court Justice , Republican candidates had a debate and met in South Carolina for the 9th GOP debate.This debate mainly discussed what each candidate would do if they were to become president. During these debates, the candidates are given a chance to deliver their messages , and to help voters determine which candidate will be best as president. In the republican debate, each candidate was asked a question which they was expected to answer but somehow didn't appear to do so. While watching, I came to conclusion that some of the arguments were successful and others unsuccessful. In the first section of the debate when candidates Ben Carson, Donald

This chapter distinguished the difference between a fight and an argument. In an example, he used a

In the United States of America there is a plethora of extravagant political parties with which one can associate. Obviously, due to the nature of the scholarship at hand, the reader of this written work is a Republican. Is there any thought ever given to the immensity of the political spectrum? There is left and right, up and down, libertarians, authoritarians, liberals, conservatives, socialists, communists, neo-libertarians, paleoconservatives, fascists, or one could be completely neutral. Still, no matter how hard we try to avoid it, in the United States of America, one is always drawn to one side, left or right, while little attention is ever given to the north or south poles of the spectrum. Association with a political party is something

How the quotations capture the historical argument over the role of the government is that people need to find a better solution since the government in a free market economy doesn't have regulations on the buyers and sellers.On the contrary command economy the government controls everything the people do as well as the prices and wages of the