Homosexuality on screen has been a taboo topic since the creation of film in the late nineteenth century and remained that way until violent protest of the 1970’s sexual revolution. Continually, the overuse of hateful slurs against the gay community is still used today as comedic relief. The overall delayment in representation of homosexuals in the industry paused the long march for equal rights and resulted in inaccurate stereotypes such as the “pansy” or villains. The conservative reaction towards such liberal topics caused filmmakers to conceal “queer cinema” as production codes enforced strict laws, but as time progressed so did the involvement of the LGBT community in the film industry, The first glimpse of homosexuality is questionably
As a society, we feed off of each other for what a proper response to something may be. As children, we first look to see our mother’s reaction after falling down; if she is calm, I should also be. We look to each other for what a definition of things should be, as well. In the 1950’s, it was generally obscene for a woman on television to show her belly button, whereas today we will show nude breasts on primetime programming. This follows the sociological theory of symbolic interactionism, where society and individual social interaction provides a subjective meaning to deviant behavior. Many social definitions change for the better, however some change for the worse. One such example was once viewed as normal, with no second thoughts given to it, but now is seen as an actual social problem affecting some groups aversely. This is the topic of homosexuality, a subject that has been on the receiving end of both accepting and discriminating cultures for thousands of years.
The Celluloid Closet explores representation in film and its enormous effect on American culture. Although the film was originally released in 1995, many of the same issues around queer representation in media still remain over twenty years later. Gay characters are often the sidekick in stories revolving around heterosexual heroes, and queer stereotypes like “The Sissy” still persistent nearly 80 years after the character first appeared; and although queer erasure is not a prevalent as it was in the 1950s and 1960s, with entire plots being changed to hide queer elements, queer stories are still hijacked in subtler ways. Notably, queer characters are still regularly played by straight actors. Furthermore, these straight actors often win prestigious
The 1950’s can be described as a conservative and sexually repressive time in the US, so how was a movie such as Some Like It Hot, a movie that dealt with crossdressing and hints of homosexuality, able to fare so well yet, at the same time, challenge the status quo of comedy and even pave a new direction for comedy in years to come? The success of Some Like It Hot effectively put a nail in the coffin of the Motion Picture Association of America as to say a Seal of Approval, or lack thereof, no longer dictates a flop in the box office. Some Like It Hot effectively built a dialogue structure on double-entendre’s, and in even some cases triple-entendre’s, that can be found in almost every passing sentence of character interchange. In fact, some
Laramie consisted of many other religions that presented the views of many of their citizens towards homosexuality. Reverend Fred Phelps, a minister from Kansas, negatively impacted the gay community as he protested against homosexuals. He believed gays were determined to go to hell because of God’s hatred for them. Reverend Phelps like McKinney was a homophobe, which upset many citizens when he ranted about gays going to hell right after the murder of Matthew Shepard. Many citizens including Romaine Patterson decided to take a stance against such hatred to “show the differences. And [to] think at times like this when we’re talking about hatred as much as the nation is right now, that someone needs to show . . . that there is a better way of
Heteronormativity can be defined as the assumption that heterosexual relationships and people are the “norm”, and that anything outside of that is seen as strange or taboo. Though heteronormativity is still persistent in our society today, this idea was much more present in the 1940’s through the 1960’s as anti-queer and anti-trans laws were put into place. These laws and ideas left queer people feeling isolated and targeted. Despite this, sexual and gender minorities traversed the heteronormative world in the 1940’s to the 1960’s by introducing their own narratives into media and using forms of civil disobedience to help themselves be seen. One way that queer people combatted the dominant narrative of heteronormativity was by providing their own experiences within the media.
In several cases, the desire to kill the queer self also occurs when it seems impossible to move forward without fully accepting and presenting oneself as queer. When this idea is seen on television it is presented in both the interpersonal and introspective forms. For example, the characters that attempt suicide, such as the eight queer women characters between 2001 and 2016, are illustrating the introspective act of assassinating the queer self by killing themselves. In contrast the interpersonal aspect derives from the idea of identity as zero-sum and therefore the queer characters who do not cover present a threat to the stability and validity of gay characters on screen. This paper will specifically investigate how the interpersonal side of "assassinating the queer selves" plays out on screen as a way to reinforce the importance of
When analyzing both the documentary and the mainstream film, one must first determine some of the important facets in gay cinema. Images about gay people seem to be more varied and recognizant of homosexuality though they may obscure other stereotypes or sectors of the LGBT community (Filaire 11). This is something both films may do in the end, since bisexuals or transgender are not present, but it serves as a
Homosexuality Annotated Bibliography Adriaens, Pieter R., and Andreas De Block. “The Evolution of a Social Construction: the Case of Male Homosexuality.” Scholarly Journals, vol. 49, ser. 4, University Press, 2006, pp. 570–585.
Before celebrating the strides of queer representation in all ages media, it is important to look back at queer representation in the past. The late film scholar Vito Russo painstakingly researched the evolution of queer representation in cinema in his landmark book The Celluloid Closet. In both the book and the documentary based of the book, Russo details the
even though sexuality can be considered universal, the sexual behaviors affiliated with it offer different attitudes in various communities. Sexuality is aligned to sexual attraction where individuals can identify themselves with a broad range of sexuality that is bisexual, gay or being lesbian. Sexuality can change over time in a person depending on the circumstances surrounding him or her. It may be affected by the social circle and emotional imbalances that may occur in an individual. Interestingly there exists sexual inequality among many societies in the world. As observed, many societies encourage men to have multiple sex partners but forbid it in women. Moreover, pre-marital sex is promoted in men, but women are flaunted if they participate in pre-marital sex. Across the globe, Western Europe has embraced certain norms in sexuality such as homosexuality whereas African society embraces a negative attitude towards the same.
The Heterosexualization of Lesbianism in the Recent Teen Film”, Kathleen Battles and Wendy Hilton-Morrow’s “Gay Characters in Conventional Spaces; Will and Grace and the Situation Comedy Genre”, Tony Coles’ “Negotiation the Field of Masculinity: The Production and Reproduction for Multiple Dominant Masculinities”, Laura Mulvey’s “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”, and Stuart Hall’s “The White of Their Eyes: Racist Ideologies and the Media.” These theories will be applied through sexuality to argue that, although
Image #2: This image currently appears with a sketch of two men, having sex with each other. There is a lot of detail placed into this sketch with all of the shadings and light outlines. The image also contains images of semen and what it looks to be tentacles, wrapped around the male with the red coloured hair.
While in the documentary several transsexuals were interviewed, the focus was on two transsexuals, male to female. The key difference between the two was the support from their family. Anoosh is a 20-year-old male who wants to receive the surgery. He has a boyfriend, and his family is very supportive. On the other hand, Aliasghar is 24-year-old male who also wants to receive the surgery, but his family have threatened to kill him and have told him that he will be shunned from the family. The other difference is that Anoosh is from Tehran, which is a big city with a mix of conservative and non-conservative people, while Aliasghar is from a small city with a small conservative population. In Iranian culture, it is very important for the families
emergence of an Underground camp cinema that was intrigued with the concept of homosexuality, the normative constructs of society and how the two coexisted. J. Hoberman and Jonathan Rosenbuam believed this new transformative cinema arose from a need to “defragment the official cinematic senses”(Hoberman, p. 39). In turn, creating new ideas and concepts to be explored. During this time period, queer/homosexual directors like Jack Smith, Kenneth Anger, and Andy Warhol created pictures like Flaming Creatures, Scorp io Rising, and Blowjob. These films addressed the relationship of heteronormative constructs to homosexuality in new ways via the use of unconventional methods, including over the top acting, the incorporation of pop icons, androgyny, minimalist framing and intense focus.
Okay, Here lately I have perceived that most gay guys within my area are not ready to settle down for their own benefits or because they have been hurt so much that they can't trust anyone else, However at my age I am ready to settle down, I want a career, I want to better myself and most of all, I want a partner who shares the same relationship qualities as I do. When I made the decision to come out gay, it was to prove that I am no different than anyone else besides the fact that I like the same gender, Just as a straight couples wants a Real relationship, I thought that is what gay guys wanted too and yes there is some out there who actually do want a Real relationship but most guys who I have encountered shares the same characteristics,