Relative Performance Analysis PaperUsing the stock market to invest in securities can be risky but with a little research and a carefully thought out investment strategy the road to financial security can be successful. In this paper, Team A will 1) determine the five-year average return for Walt Disney, Wal-Mart, Time Warner, Dell, Motorola, and US Treasury Bonds, 2) identify the industries of each of these six securities, 3) determine the average five-year average return for each industry, 4) identify three additional stocks in each industry and determine the five-year average return for each security, 5) compare the selected securities' performance to those in the same industry and to the industry average, and lastly, Team A will …show more content…
Motorola's common stock par value at the end of 2007 was $3 per share. Motorola's current stock is trading at $10.33 a share (as of August 15, 2008). Motorola's stock has had highs and lows over the past 5 years, but for the most part has performed well and increased over that time. The last year has been an exception to that five-year growth, as Motorola stock has declined 42% compared to the same time last year.
Motorola's five year average stock price is $17.49 (Yahoo Finance, 2008). Up until February of 2008, Motorola's stock performed very similar to the communications equipment industry, as well as to the S&P 500 for the past five years. Motorola has, in fact, performed better over the past five years than the NASDAQ Composite Index. The five-year average return on Motorola stock is 11.9%. Compare that to the industry average of -2.8% during the same period and Motorola stands out in its industry.
Although Motorola compares favorably to its industry's five-year average return, that is not the case with its three largest competitors. Nokia has averaged a 16.7% return for the past five years. Qualcomm has averaged a 24.7% return and Ericsson has averaged a 37% return during the same five-year period (Morningstar, 2008).
US Treasury BondUnited States Treasury Bonds, or T-Bonds, are marketable, U.S. debt securities that have a fixed interest rate and very little risk. T-Bonds are issued in various
The weekly performance of the stock has a trend of constant growth with a significant growth in price compared to the IBM stock which happened in week four to six (09/30/11-10/06/16). A major factor for the large jump in the stock price is due to the shocking current news of Google acquiring Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion. Right after the announcement of
The purpose of this company analysis is to discover why one company would be better to invest in over the other. The analysis is based on two competing companies within the same industry. While these two companies compare in products and services, they do not relate in overall size. To assist in making an educating decision, many areas of each company were looked at. A comprehensive financial ratio analysis was completed for each company, as well as an evaluation of their strengths, weaknesses and future opportunities. While it is important to consider how a company manages its finances, it is equally important to consider its future prospects as well. Below you will find a brief description of each company, and an
We recommend a buy or long position on the Comcast Corporation with a target price of $64.19. By applying the discounted cash flow method, Comcast shows prevailing real value of $62.87. With a current price of $59.64 as of April 24, 2015, the firm appears to be undervalued.
Historic Average Total Annual Returns on US Government Securities and Common Stocks (1950 -1996) Average Annual Return Standard Deviation T-Bills 5,2% 3,0% Intermediate Bonds a 6,4% 6,6% Long Term Bonds b 6,0% 10,8% Large Company Stocks c 14,0% 16,8% Small Company Stocks d 17,8% 25,6%
The dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 5.8% per year into the foreseeable future. The price of this stock is now $25.18.
Another option is to use data for small companies in order to match the high return and high risk nature of Ameritrade. Although Ameritrade’s investment may make it more risky than the average large company, the beta we have chosen already reflects that higher risk. Therefore, we have chosen to use the market return for large companies because it more accurately depicts an overall picture of the stock market and Ameritrade’s status as a large firm. After subtracting the chosen risk-free rate of 5.24% from the average large company market return of 14.0%, we estimated the market risk-premium to be 8.76%.
Zack’s recently downgraded the share price from a buy to a hold, while analysts at Canaccord Genuity continue to keep a buy rating on the stock with a price target of $27 per share. Out of five analysts polled, four of the five place a buy recommendation on the stock with a price target of $26 to $27 per share.
have experienced persistent volatility and sustained decreases over the years. In comparison with its industry peers like Verizon Inc., AT&T Inc. and T-Mobile Inc., Sprint’s stock performance is significantly poorer. A stock comparison with the listed major competitors reveals that Sprint Corp. has the lowest current share price of $4.53 (6/10/15, 9 am) that is merely 11% of the above mentioned category average. With a market beta over of 1.14 signifying volatility, the corporation has negative current earnings per share of $ -0.84 denoting company’s deteriorating profitability.
If the company did go public, its share price should be $384.37 for per share with the rapid growth scenario.
$2.51. Often investors are willing to pay a Premium for a company that has a high dividend or
The United States stock market has experienced many interesting events this year, testing the nerves of millions of people around the world. The market started the year with the worst two-week performance in its history, creating a lot of uncertainty for the year to come. A severe decline in oil prices caused many firms within the energy industry to suffer. However, despite these negative events, gold saw its best quarter in 30 years, the market had a large reversal, and oil has been recovering. These volatile movements provided an amazing opportunity to make money for investors, relief for those who had holdings during this time, and a better outlook for firms. Two firms that have had an interesting year so far are ExxonMobil Corp. and Apple Inc. Exxon has experienced the effects of macroeconomic variables, while Apple has had some internal issues that lead to some stock price fluctuations.
Among the myriad of technology companies now available for investment on the stock market, Google’s new parent Alphabet and the ever-innovating Apple Inc. maintain their spots as two of the most popular. The two titanic companies have previously had a sizeable gap between the values of their stocks, with Apple Inc. leading Alphabet thanks largely to its massive deposits of cash. USA Today analyst John Shinal asserts that because of this more rapid growth, Alphabet is the ideal investment over Apple Inc. for investors who favor growth stocks while Apple Inc. is preferred for its dividend payouts. Shinal’s assertion is presented in a very formal manner with few detractors, giving his analysis a larger feeling of credibility even without prior knowledge of his credentials.
The earnings, dividends, and stock price of Shelby Inc. are expected to grow at 7% per year in the future. Shelby’s common stock sells for $23 per share, its last dividend was $2.00, and the company will pay a dividend of $2.14 at the end of the current year.
Given that the company is looking at a valuation of over Rs 5,200 crore (~$1.05 billion) at the upper end of the price band, it is seeking a PE multiple of around 18 times its trailing net profit on an annualised basis. For the nine months ended December 31, 2011 MCX had total income of Rs 474 crore and net profit of Rs 220