Reflection Of Political Science

The Road to Patriation To create a constitution is no small feat; that much can be seen by the incredible journey that Canada went through. A span of several years, different governments and tactics (each becoming more and more desperate) working almost in full force to help pursue a patriated constitution. The Road to Patriation, written and directed by Robert Duncan, creates a narrative that discusses the absolute need for a constitution that allowed Canada the right to amend the constitution. The film shins a light on the political importance of locating Canadian politics in Canada, and the government powers that reintroduced the idea of a charter of rights and the methods they used.

(mapleleafweb.com). Canada’s new constitution is considered one of Canada’s building blocks to become the successful and sovereign nation it is today, and along with it came the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The constitution assessed many issues Canadians had been facing since the British North American Act (BNA) in 1867; it removed almost all aspects of Canada previously being a British colony and gave the nation its long awaited full independence. (Christiano 17-18). The constitution also provided all Canadians with a proper definition of Canadian citizenship and solidifying Canada’s unity as a nation. The goal of the constitution as described by Jean Chrétien was to “reflect a society that was more than a community of communities and indeed was one where the bonds of citizenship were strong” (Axworthy 292). The passing of the constitution was a huge success for the Trudeau government and was arguably the most important event in Canadian history since confederation in

By bringing home the constitution, Trudeau was able to give Canada a chance to gain independence over its own political policies, apart from the British rule. This hit two birds with one stone because it also made the French Canadians so happy that they were reluctant in separating from Canada. The Constitutional Act also included of the Charter of Rights and Freedom. This is the most memorable thing my Prime Minster did because he is still remembered today for creating this virtuous Act. It is because of Trudeau that we are able to openly express ourselves and practice our religion and culture without any restrictions.

The constitution act of 1982 brought the country’s constitution to Canada from Great Britain for

As Pierre Elliot Trudeau strived to patriate the Constitution, the opposition was a huge threat. “The Statute of Westminster (1931) and the Second World War (1939-1945) secured Canada 's independence. However, Canada continued to retain its links to Great Britain, since its Constitution could only be modified by the British Parliament” (Roch). Trudeau wanted to put an end to British control by modifying the Constitution. In the last few weeks of the 1979 election campaign, Trudeau was struggling and decided it was time to present his plan. As he put it in a Toronto speech, “a Constitution made in Canada, by Canadians, for Canadians” (Lewis 16). The idea was not popular among Canadians and Conservative leader Joe Clark became the youngest Prime Minister in Canadian history. This did not last very long though as a vote of non-confidence occurred after the government proposed tax increases. “As a result of his government 's defeat, Clark called a general election for Feb. 18, 1980. Trudeau led the Liberals in the campaign. He climaxed an

Pierre Elliot Trudeau was arguably one of the most vivacious and charismatic Prime Ministers Canada has ever seen. He wore capes, dated celebrities and always wore a red rose boutonniere. He looked like a superhero, and often acted like one too. Some of the landmark occurrences in Canadian history all happened during the Trudeau era, such as patriating the constitution, creating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the 1980 Quebec Referendum. However, it is Trudeau’s 1969 “white paper” and the Calder legal challenge which many consider to be one of his most influential contributions to Canadian history.

“Political philosophy” and “political theory” are versatile, yet relative terms. Ironically, the most unifying aspect of both definitions is their fluidity. One of the only things that theorists concur on is the purpose of a political theory, which is to incite change to a certain degree. The intention of political theorists and political philosophers alike is to unveil the deeper problems in our world, and to emphasize the importance of contemplation as a catalyst for rectification.

Being from an area that is considered the political capital of the United States, politics have been intertwined into my life. I have expressed my personal political views in different fashions. For the most part, I'm not one to share my political perspective, however, when one asks my opinion on the matter, I'll put in my two cents. Bottom line, I do not express my opinion openly, but if it comes into a conversation, I will weigh

Problem-solving analysis: a robust analysis must suggest solutions to identified problem. For instance, a political analyst could suggest possible solution to the problem of political violence during elections.

The debate as whether politics can be regarded as a science is ‘complex, voluminous and multi-faceted one’ . The origins of political analysis lie in the philosophical tradition of Plato and Aristotle whose work was fundamentally rooted in the normative. At the very early stages of politics as an academic discipline, the great thinkers of the time were not concerned with empirical evidence; instead basing their ideas on literary analysis. The emphasis on the normative that comes with the traditional study of politics suggests that politics is not a science as it cannot be objective. This was followed by the emergence of the normative model of political analysis and what Peter Lasslett

Political science includes a wide range of topics that attempts to describe and explain the political process, politics, and the relationship among governments. As American citizens we should all be informed and be educated about all these above topics. We as citizens cannot be unconscious of our government as the government can make or break our lives. The general areas of study in political science include American government and politics, political theory, public administration, public law, comparative politics and international relations.

The study of politics had its roots in philosophy and while there has been a drive to steer the study of politics towards a more scientific approach, many scholars like Max Weber believe that social sciences cannot simply imitate the natural sciences. This essay will examine the various approaches to applying scientific methodology to the study of politics and it will specifically explore Behaviorism, Positivism and Interpretivism and by looking at each methodology briefly explore the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Comparative politics is an essential field within political science, as it is always present and always prevalent. One of the most alluring elements of comparative politics is the stark contrast one can observe between two or more nations in terms of their sociopolitical climate. Every nation has distinct political intricacies, and one particularly controversial issue that is gaining interest globally is political corruption. Corruption can manifest itself in a myriad of ways in a nation’s government regime, and widespread corruption can have significant repercussions on sustainability, the balance of power, and individual rights within a nation state. In 2015, Transparency International ranked North Korea the second most corrupt nation in the world, while Norway was ranked the sixth least corrupt. This paper will examine the staggering juxtaposition in corruption levels between the two nations based on the contrast in their respective governmental regimes and institutions. It will dissect the causes for this disparity in corruption levels, and examine how this factor has impacted both countries in an attempt to uncover the motivations and costs linked to corruption.

As centuries have passed, political thought has undergone constant development and together with its development are changes. These changes had a tremendous effect in the discipline. Political philosophy continued to progress which affected both political theory and political science. It seems that with the progression of political philosophy, there was a growing need for the the discipline to become more scientific. They wanted it to be based on facts, to become value-free and to be precise. Political philosophy started veering away from the classics. Despite the continuous need to be scientific, there were still groups which remained inclined to the classics and believed that the traditions and values are essential in studying the discipline. These conflicting views concerning the traditionalists and the behavioralists caused the gap between political philosophy and political science and eventually the two separated. So it seems that as political philosophy progress, political science branched outside the academe and political theory, as it grew larger became more and more alienated.

To start off, I’m not a very political person. When someone usually mention politics, I immediately start thinking about government and politicians. This is probably the most common answer someone will get from most citizens. Another response you may get is that when someone says politics, people think of social relations between two or more parties. An example may include that one person may get a promotion because they know the right people in the company. Some other person may be upset by this and blame it on politics of the company. These are correct because describing politics is no easy feat. In class, today (8/31), we talked about how politics is a vague term and can be used in a couple of situations.