In college divisions sports, athletes receive scholarships and academic grants. Instead of getting money athletes receive scholarships to help pay for their education. Many college athletes don’t receive scholarships and things of that nature but, they shouldn’t be payed to play sports, because students go to college to receive an education and most athletes receive scholarships that offer free tuition, free room and board, and they also receive other stipends to help toward books and other basic need.
In college division 1 sports, at least 56% of the athletes receive some type of scholarship. In division 2 sports, at least 61% of the athletes receive some level of athletic aid, and in division 3 sports, 82% of the athletes receive academic grants and need-based scholarships. Instead of receiving money they get scholarships to help pay for their education, which is the reason for going to college. College is for one to further their education, and the sports
…show more content…
The money that these programs bring in goes to pay for the facilities, training, and all other expenses. (usatoday.com) People tend to forget that most athletes tend to get paid in scholarships. Let’s not forget the experience an athlete gets while in college. Besides, an athlete plays college sports because of their passion, not because they make money from it. Here’s ten possible reasons why a college athlete shouldn’t be paid; college athletic programs cannot afford to pay college athletes, most elite college athletes receive sports scholarships (which is payment enough), playing college sports is a privilege, there is no fair way to pay college athletes, students are not professionals, paying students athletes will cause cuts elsewhere, the NCAA is a not-for-profit organization, college students are financially irresponsible, paying college athletes to play will not stop the corruption of the system, and paying college athletes would ruin
That is more than The National Basketball Association and The national Hockey League. With all of that money made a large portion doesn’t go back to the classroom. The NCAA states that paying college athletes would ruin the competitiveness of the the sport which doesn’t make any sense, because the NFL pays its players based on their rankings and performance. Suggesting that payment destroys the competition then the NFL is incredibly misinformed. If the NCAA paid its athletes the students would not have to add extra stress worrying about where they will get their money from. If students did not have to worry about their finances, they could spend more time focusing on their game and class. This helps prevent tired and burnt out athletes from underperforming when it’s
Free education is a huge factor as to why they should not be paid. Research shows that “College athletes don't have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on living and meal plans.” (Source B) Which can add up to a substantial amount. I would say they get free education, in return they represent the school in sports.
The NCAA and CBS has signed a $10.8 billion television agreement over 14 years and that’s just that specific contract which doesn’t even scratch the surface of all of the other money the NCAA is making off of advertisements and many other things such as that. Arguments for paying college athletes may be somewhat strong but it still needs to be taken into consideration that these athletes are getting plenty from their scholarships and the amazing opportunity of going pro and being able to sign huge contracts with teams in the sport they chose to
(Ackerman, V., & Scott, L. (2016, March 29).) Athletes are exposed to incredible resources in college that other students do not receive without having to pay. Most athletes can get a tutor for little charge to keep them eligible and also receive full access to health professions to keep them healthy to pay. About 67% of athletes graduate with their degree and also throw into athletes that enter professional sports leagues, they are often better off after college than non athlete students. (Ackerman, V., & Scott, L. (2016, March 29).)
Although college athletes receive a far superior scholarship to attend a college than do non-athlete students, the athletes should still receive extra income from the billions of dollars the NCAA generates per year.
What amount of money should college athletes be paid? This has been a controversial question for many years.Some lower level Division One NCAA athletes think that their scholarships do not pay them enough as it is, and instead they want cash rather than the scholarship. These situations have been taken to court and arbitrated in NCAA hearings. The NCAA, or the National College Athletics Association, has declined for the athletes to be paid a salary every time when they surmise that they should. There are so many reasons why the NCAA has declined for these athletes to be paid and have proven to be naive. The NCAA should not be conciliatory on
Even going up to division one schools there are still very few that make a profit. According to George Dohrmann a lot of athletic programs don't create enough money to generate the profit needed to pay athletes. Major programs like Oregon's earned $44,538,251 in 2009-10 thanks to the chairman of Nike who has apparently donated 300 million over the years and would be able to pay athletes, meanwhile other schools like Mississippi and San Jose State would fail because they didn't break even. Not all schools have backers like Oregon, but other schools out there who do have them like Ohio State like Michigan like UCLA could write checks out to athletes using the huge checks they get from Nike. But as Dennis Johnson refutes, the athletes at college should always be students first and foremost while having athletics come later, but any money that universities make goes right back into the non-profiting sports. Actually, the NCAA funds more than 80 national championships a year across three divisions, demonstrating the spread of the organization across the states. Even though champions usually come from a small pool for all college sports paying athletes would draw all the athletes to the higher paying school eliminating chances of upsets almost for good (Johnson). In other words the money for their scholarships is coming from the NCAA so no matter what sport they play all of their
First, scholarships are not being benefited from due to the lack of time the athlete has. A reimbursement for students not using the scholarship to its full potential is pay. Second, student-athletes often end up with low paying jobs, so a pay rate in college can help them out after finishing school. Paying college athletes would help their future if they do end up with a bad job. Third, college sports have profited millions of dollars off of these student-athletes and they only receive a scholarship.
Finally, the most important reason college athletes should not be paid because they receive a free education for playing for the university or college. “College athletes receive numerous amenities and luxuries free of charge” (Post Column 1). The athletes are students sustaining entry to a college education through their involvement in sports, which means they earn scholarships that pay for their bills; living space, committee, and other authorized payments. “Paying college athletes would diminish all the goals and morals that colleges and universities stand for” (Post Column 1). College sports is not an occupation or vocation.
Most college athletes do not end up going pro they end up like the vast majority of people,and go into a field related to their major. The scholarship athletes get can give them their degree for way less than the average student. College athletes also get to develop great characters like honesty, integrity, and leadership skills all qualities future employers look for in their employees. Division one college are not making money they are non profit organizations. So where would the money come from to pay the athletes?
With sports being such a big part in a student getting admitted to college their education is often put as a secondary priority. Many student athletes lose focus on the purpose of attending college due to the dedication required for playing sports at a collegiate level. Responses by student athletes vary when asked: Should student athletes be paid for their participation in college sports? College athletes very rarely analyze everything they are given, including opportunities to meet people, luxuries such as clothes and shoes, and lastly a free education. College athletes are offered scholarships and are given the chance to attend school debt free, while playing the sport they love. Student athletes
Garda states, “College athletes are, in fact, already compensated for their athletic services, in the sense that most receive either full or partial athletic scholarships that cover the costs of their tuition, room and board, and textbooks” (Garda 1). College athletes receive scholarships that pay for necessary college materials that many schools do not grant their students the opportunity to have. College can cost up to tens of thousands of dollars to attend, and there are many people across the country who cannot afford a college education. Colleges do not need to pay their athletes extra just for playing a sport when they already receive a sufficient amount of funds for their education. Student-athletes should take advantage of their scholarships and use the money to focus on getting an education instead of
Some believe that college athletes should not be paid for their performances because athletes with scholarships receive money for tuition, books and housing. Although this may be true, most college athletes do not receive scholarships. One article notes that students with a grade point average (GPA) of
Most people fail to realize that athletes are essentially getting paid from all the benefits they are receiving from the college through various scholarships (Dorfman, 2013). College athletes can receive a full athletic scholarship from an NCAA Division I university that is worth up to $65,000. A scholarship with that amount, the athlete will use $45,000 for tuition and the last $20,000 for room,
Being a division one soccer player, I do receive a small athletic scholarship that helps with paying for school. Big time sports like men’s football and basketball receive full scholarships that can cover tuition, books, food, and housing for athletes. College is essentially paid for while athletes participate in their sport which means a free education and no need to take out student loans. There are also many academic support services for athletes to ensure grades stay up for eligibility.