preview

Rear Window Comparison

Decent Essays

The success of an adaptation of a film usually rests on the shoulders of a master director, seen as such in 1954’s Rear Window directed by none other than Alfred Hitchcock. The premise for this film is based off of a story published in 1942 named It Had to Be Murder written by Cornell Woolrich. The ability to take a short story and adapt its plot masterfully to the big screen is nothing short of an accomplishment. The differences between It Had to Be Murder and the screenplay for Rear Window are remarkable. Hitchcock changed and adapted many aspects of the story in order to breathe vibrant life into the story’s characters and settings. One such change can be seen within the main character, Jeff’s, occupation. In the short story, not much was …show more content…

This is remedied by Hitchcock, who gave Jeff a whole backstory, along with context to why he is currently bound to a wheelchair. Jeff is now a photographer who is on hiatus due to an injury during one of his photoshoots. He is not only a photographer, but a photographer who goes out into dangerous situations to capture pictures, much like a war photographer. The screenplay first reveals his job in which, “THE CAMERA PANS to a nearby table on which rests a shattered and twisted Speed Graphic Camera, the kind used by fast-action news photographers.” This action line perfectly encapsulates all the background information that the viewer needs to know about Jeff’s circumstances. Another change that Hitchcock implemented into the story was the introduction of the various neighbors in Jeff’s apartment complex. In It Had to Be Murder, the neighbors were nameless and not very relevant to the story. In the story, Jeff describes that, “there was a young jitter-couple, kids in their teens, who only just married.” (Woolrich). This is not a very descriptive analysis of his neighbors, as it leaves the reader wondering why his neighbors are important to the story if they aren’t fleshed out very …show more content…

The contents of the screenplay to the film release are very similar except for the fact that the film has video. The screenplay is just words, while the film is a sort of adaptation of those words. This includes the actors’ performance, camera shots/movements, and the entirety of the visual aspect. Such a scene where the screenplay is perfectly transcribed onto the big screen is the intense confrontation between Jeff and Thorwald. From the start to end, every detail that is in the screenplay is amplified by the use of camera techniques and the actors’ stellar performances. Hitchcock masterfully translates the suspense of Thorwald slowly breaking into Jeff’s room with the purposeful lack of sound and darkness on the screen. This builds tension for the scene. Tension is kept constant throughout the scene, especially during Jeff and Thorwald’s conversation. The action lines state that Jeff is silent for the most part while Thorwald is questioning him. While this may seem intense on paper, it is unmatched against James Stewart’s (Jeff’s) acting. His silence speaks loudly, providing an unnerving tone for the scene, as the audience does not know what comes

Get Access