preview

Reagan Administrations

Decent Essays

Why were Reagan's cabinet members and select few of other national organizations under scrutiny in the 1980’s? The public questioned the end of Ronald Reagan’s second term as President of the United States for his lack of integrity and lack of transparency. In early 1986, Reagan wanted to help a group of Nicaraguan rebels overthrow the Sandinista National Liberation Front that had taken over the Central American country (Shipler, 1986, para. 2). At the same time, seven Americans were being held hostage by Iranian revolutionists in Lebanon, and an operation to get them freed was being discussed within Reagan’s Cabinet (Gwertzman, 1986, para. 5). In an attempt to free the hostages, the United States Government sold arms to a Middle Eastern country …show more content…

The United States’ involvement with the Nicaraguan Contras was limited by the Boland Amendments, which explicitly stated that intelligence agencies were forbidden to provide support to the Contras (Gordon, 2987, para. 8). While the Reagan Administration wanted to deal arms with Iran, the Boland Amendments limited ways of negotiations. Reagan used Democratic Representative Edward Boland’s statement of, “only the CIA and Pentagon [are] intelligences (Gordon, 1987, para. 8)” to use the NSC to negotiate with Iran. As a result of Boland’s statements, the Reagan Administration used the National Security Council, specifically Lt. Col. Oliver North, to provide funds for the Contras (Winess, 1989, para. 3). North would use the money from the arms deal to fund the Contras. North was heavily involved in the release of the seven hostages from Lebanon, and was a key figure in the illegal activity preformed during Reagan’s presidency. Congress appropriated $27 million for the Contras in the 1986 fiscal year (Special, 1987, para. 4). Which means the US already gave funds for Reagan to distribute in Nicaragua without having to obtain more; however, Congress did allowed the Administration “to solicit Contra aid from other nations,” but forbid them from using any funds to purchase weapons (Special, 1987, para. 4). The Reagan …show more content…

The arms embargo between the United States and Iran forbid the United States from selling arms to the Iraqis. The goal of the embargo was to stop the Iran-Iraq war. Sending the shipment through Israel, Reagan sold Iran 500 antitank missiles (Gwertzman, 1986, para. 1). Lt. Col. Oliver North diverted a portion of the funds that the United States gathered from the sale to the Contra war effort, supposedly without Reagan’s knowledge and without informing the public. On 11 December 1986, 1Iranian man that Reagan used as a point of reference in Lebanon “asserted that he had personally gone to Lebanon to arrange the release of American hostages (Butterfield, 1986, para. 1).” Reagan knew about the arms embargo to Iran, but still went ahead to sell arms to further the American effort in Nicaragua. In essence he declared involvement in war with supplying a hostile nation with arms, and a party-torn country with money. The controversy is not the actions any leader did, but how the American public was left out of the decisions being made in Washington D.C. For all of time the American government has been seen as a clear pane of glass where both sides can see through. These hidden events tinted the window from the public. The Government did not inform the public and they

Get Access