Carver uses irony to show that the narrator, does not know his wife. He feels “sorry for the blind man” who had never seen his wife, unaware of his own 'blindness' to his wife's need for emotional intimacy. When the wife shares her poetry, about “what she had felt” he is uncomfortable and unable to give her an honest reaction.”I didn't think much of the poem. Of course, I didn't tell her that” . The deep emotional connection that Robert and his wife enjoyed is beyond the narrator's understanding. The narrator's revelation that “Every night I smoked dope and stayed up as long as I could before I fell asleep. …. When I did go to sleep, I had these dreams. Sometimes I’d wake up from one of them, my heart going crazy”, tells us that he cannot
The author analyzes and speculates the story in a very different way. He mentions many speculations that he comes up with in his analysis. From a speculation about Carver is an alcoholic due to the drinking habit of the narrator in Carver’s short story to a speculation about the narrator’s wife was just as awkward as her husband when she first met the blind man. The author even has an out-of-the-box thinking about the way Carver uses names in this story due to the fact that there are only two names are used in the entire story, Robert and Beulah. He speculates that only the narrator’s wife calls the blind man by his name “Robert”, because she want to make a point that they know each other well despite the fact that she no longer knows him. The author also adds that by doing so the narrator’s wife hopes that she’ll be able to understand and reconnect with the blind man again. In the end, the author ends his analysis on Carver’s writing style because he thinks that the story could be much more interesting if Carver doesn’t use the chronological way to tell the
In Raymond Carver’s short story, “Popular Mechanics”, the choices he makes enhances the plot and further thickens the dark, melancholy setting, theme, and tone. The absence of quotation marks and other simple forms of punctuation throughout the text displays a sense of a frantic and rushed situation, while the sentence that appears in the short story too many times to count highlights the insignificance the couple’s baby truly holds in the dangerous debacle. Lastly, the importance of the title itself offers a gift of revelation to those who dig deeper into the story’s theme and can recognize the connection to the text. Together, these aspects of the story offer a very different point of view for the reader. Overall, these discrepancies create
He is always focused on his wife, and even though it is not his ideal of a perfect marriage he does seem to love and admire his wife as if it was. He is capable of telling us a lot of details about his wife without ever calling her out or even trying to persuade us to dislike her. His love for her makes it possible for the narrator to get past his dislike of Robert, and allow him to stay in his house. Even after all the dislike he shares with us in the very beginning of the story. He comes into the kitchen to talk to his wife, and tries his best to be a nice guy about the topic of the blind guest which is a much different view from earlier. This persuades us to look at the narrator in his wife's perspective, even though we have knowledge that she doesn't about the narrators anxiety over Robert. Another large detail we have over the wife is that the narrator is jealous of Robert and is just using his blindness as a scapegoat. However, even though this extreme case of jealousy is unhealthy for their relationship, the narrator, in his own way, tells his wife he loves her. When his wife tells him "If you love me... you can do this for me. If you don't love me, okay." he does exactly that and tries to make Robert comfortable (Carver 107).
In Raymond Carver’s Cathedral, the reader is given a glimpse into the precarious relationship between the narrator and his wife. The narrator shares his heavily critical point of view on the forthcoming visit from his wife’s old friend whom he calls “the blind man” later known as “Robert”. Specifically, Carver uses first person narrative to put the reader in the mindset of the speaker who although keeps information hidden about himself, eventually exposes a substantial amount of character through his commentary. Slowly but surely he divulges his tremendously insecure, stubborn, and immature nature when it comes to matters of exhibiting empathy for others and most importantly obtaining the emotional depth for it.
The story opens with the narrator giving a background of his wife and Robert. Immediately, it is easy for the audience to form a negative opinion about the narrator. Within the first paragraph of the story he says, “I wasn’t enthusiastic about his visit. He was no one I knew. And his being blind bothered me” (Carver 33). This exemplifies his pre-formed opinion about Robert even though he hardly knows anything about him. He clearly is uncomfortable with the fact that Robert is blind, mainly based on his lack of exposure to people with disabilities. The narrator is very narrow-minded for most of this story, making it easy to initially dislike him.
Never judge a book by its cover. This being said, in Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral,” there are three main characters; the narrator, his wife, and their guest of honor, Robert. He is visiting the narrator’s wife after the passing of his own beloved wife, Beulah. Prior to their meet, the Narrator, is terribly jealous of Robert. He has grown tired of his wife consistently talking about this blindman who she used to assist with his work. She tells the Narrator that before her second marriage, Robert placed his hands on her face and it was the most sensational feeling ever. His visit brings an unwelcoming comfortability for the Narrator. How can someone be so jealous of another’s friendship? Robert is the epitome of a short story character. He
He made her happier than her husband did. There was never a dull moment when the wife was with Robert, the blind man. I think there are many reasons why the wife wasn’t happy with her husband. In Tracy Caldwell’s Literary Criticism, she states, “Carver survived one failed marriage, several bankruptcies, and an alcohol addiction which he overcame in 1977.”
In Carver's story, the reader fully understands the main character. In the story, the reader gets insights into the narrator's view on the blind man. the reader can tell by the narrator's comments about listening to the blind
Raymond Carver the author of “Cathedral” the narrator in this story has some prejudices, against blind people as well as so discomfort and jealousy towards Robert who is his wife long friend and confidence. In spite of how the narrator feel about Robert he does exactly what his wife asked him to do, helps to make Robert feel comfortable. This is where the reader can see the narrator had integrity. He puts his own person feeling behind him and does everything he can for Robert. For example, making sure Robert understands what's on television. We see leadership and integrity in Robert as well, Robert isn’t just a blind man, he is a man that has seen the world and a person who works with what he was giving and makes the best of his life that he
The protagonist, the narrator is closed minded and lacks communication with his wife, which clearly exhibits the distance and troubles in their relationship. The narrator is not happy with having the blind man, Robert, who he sees as a stranger over in his home which stirs up more trouble with his wife. ‘“You don’t have any friends, she said. Period, she said, “goddamn it, his wife’s just died! Don’t you understand that? The man’s lost his wife”’ (Carver 107). The wife is obviously mad with her husband who doesn’t understand the close relationship she has with Robert, which is a mutual understanding. Throughout their limited conversation the narrator asks about Roberts wife who has just
In the beginning of the story, the husband, who is the narrator of “Cathedral,” seems to be a very ignorant, uncaring man. Nesset wrote “Walled in by his own insecurities and prejudices, this narrator is sadly out of touch with his world and with himself, buffered by drink and pot and by the sad reality, as his wife puts it, that he has no ‘friends’” (Nesset 124). The narrator has no connection to himself or the outside world. He has no friends, as his wife points out, which goes to show he keeps to himself, but he still doesn’t fully understand who “himself” is, because he doesn’t have that connection to himself, thus leading to the drinking and drugs. He wasn’t used to change, so having a visitor come over to his house bothered him. The moment he saw Robert, the narrator began to change. When his wife pulled up with the blind man in the car and they got out of the car, he saw that Robert had a beard and he thought to himself, “This blind man, feature this, he was wearing a full beard! A beard on a blind man! Too much, I say” (Carver 35). The narrator had expected to see the blind man in the way they showed them in the movies, but now that his idea of who Robert was as a person was being challenged, the change started to appear. Robert, who is a static character, is very essential in the change of the narrator. It is because Robert is the way he is, his marrying of a colored woman, his travels around the
This seems to unsettle the husband, as he notices that his wife has a stronger connection with Robert than they have in their marriage. The husband is blind to his wife’s feelings and needs in their relationship, and this lack of communication between them has affected their marriage. His wife wrote a poem about her experience with the blind man touching her face, and he brushed it off by stating that, “[He] can remember not thinking much about the poem” (33). The blind man however acts as an outlet for the wife to vent about her feelings which forms a close bond between the two. Robert can understand the speaker’s wife in a way that the speaker clearly is not able to. The narrator mentions that he believes Robert’s wife, Beluah, must have led a miserable life because she, “could never see herself as she was seen in the eyes of her loves one. A woman who could never go on day after day and never receive the smallest compliment from her beloved” (34). He believes that the blind man’s wife must have suffered due to his inability to see her, yet the narrator has never even truly seen his own wife. Robert’s friendship with the speaker’s wife is what his own marriage is lacking due to not being able to recognize that his wife needs an emotional connection with him.
The short story is written in a colloquial tone and reads similarly to an unfocused train of thought, conveying simplicity and realism within the piece. The narrator frequently drifts from a complete statement to an aside throughout the narrative; for example, while discussing the poem his wife composed about her friend Robert he offhandedly recalls, “...I didn’t think much of the poem. Of course, I didn’t tell her that. Maybe I just don’t understand poetry,” (Carver 356). This passage, and others similar to it, cause the flow of the plot to meander, rather than adhere to a strict linear format. Additionally, while the abrupt and nonchalant remarks hold little substance to the narrator, they give the reader a window to the substantial disconnect between the narrator and his peers.
Throughout the story, the man is almost dazed, trying to savor the past and acting without a care. In the opening scene of the story, the man is drinking excessively and staring out of the kitchen window onto his lawn; his furniture is arrange in the yard as it was in the house. He even repositions the “nightstand and reading lamp on his side of the bed, nightstand and reading lamp on her side. His side, her side” (Carver 3). His actions and his thought process make it apparent that thoughts about the woman are having an impact on his mental state. He is being haunted by these memories of them.
The husband first begins to open up to Robert when he watches with "admiration" as the blind man eats his food. He begins to see Robert as an independent man that has learned to live life despite his disability. There is a moment of connection when they all three finally begin the meal and he describes them as if they were all the same, eating the same way, intently and "seriously" (351). The husband asks to share a joint with Robert when his wife is not present, showing an indication of trust or maybe cockiness (352). Though shocked of her husband's actions, the wife joins in when she returns. When the wife has passed out between them, he commences to enjoying Robert's presence. When Robert wishes to stay up with him, listening to the television, the husband makes the