Random Drug Testing Case Study

Drug courts were developed in response to a perceived need within society and the criminal justice system. This study collected data from 600 participants who successfully completed drug treatment court. The Drug Court Graduate Survey was developed by the court’s treatment program staff to serve as a measure of motivation for successful completion of the program as well as an evaluation of program functioning. The survey asked a variety of questions related to the clients experience in drug court and the client’s suggestions about way the court could change to improve effectiveness. Clients in this drug court provided interesting clues as to why drug addicted individuals enter drug court and what factors helped them successfully graduate.

The dog sit and behaved the whole time. When Opal went to the library regularly, she was new to the town and lost her mother when she was only like 2 years old. So she needed to make new friends and when she was thinking about that the town’s big bullies arrived and Opal said quickly “You guys are bald headed cry babies!” Then, quickly ran to the library with her dog

New Jersey statute N.J.A.C. 6A:16-4.4 raises a host of legal and financial issues for school district administrators. According to the law, when it comes to random testing of student alcohol and other drug use, districts that decide to do random drug tests must follow certain protocols to ensure students’ 4th Amendment rights are not violated.

The issue of drug testing in the workplace has sparked an ongoing debate among management. There are many who feel that it is essential to prevent risks to the greater public caused by substance abuse while on the job. However, others believe that the costs far outweigh the benefits and that it is an invasion of privacy. Putting all ethical issues aside, evidence presented in this paper supports the latter. The costs of drug testing are excessive and only a small percentage of employees are actually found to be substance users. Drug testing in the work place has a negative effect on productivity; contrary to what was originally intended. It actually decreases productivity

In hopes to cut down on the speeding, speeding enforcement programs are put into place. With these programs they help cut down on the speeding a little in some of the areas, but not all areas can be monitored by police due to the limited space in most areas. Even with these programs there are the drivers who just don’t want to slow down when in the construction zones. When drivers are speeding through these zones, they also switch lanes quickly which is very dangerous in the tighter areas of the construction zones and can lead to accidents. The residents that drive cars aren’t the only ones speeding in these zones, but semi-trucks speed through them as well. When these big trucks are barreling through the already tight two lanes it can make for a nerve wrecking drive. One way to try to avoid these crazy drivers is to always pay attention. Make sure to checking all surroundings and keeping one’s eyes on the road. They lanes are very confined and the more attention that is paid it lessens the chance of getting into an accident with a speeding

The goal of mandatory drug testing would be to reduce student substance by deterring substance use, detecting substance use, and the influence of the behaviors of students peers. Students involved in extracurricular activities, such as sports that are subject to in school drug testing, report less drug use than students in high school that do not play a sport and do not get drug tested. By drug testing the Athens student body would help by insure a safe, secure, and healthy school environment where students can reach their full academic potential to learn. Athens High schools goal should be to identify students with possible drug abuse issues and to intervene. Students should be required to take drug test to be allowed to park on campus. Less drugs in

How many people have had an interview for a job, received a call that they were hired, and then heard their future employer say that they will have to do a drug test before they can start this new job? “Although many people think that illegal drugs such as marijuana, heroin, cocaine and other street drugs became a problem for youth in the 1960’s the truth of the matter is that there has always been a drug problem in the United States when it comes to substance abuse”(testcountry.org). This past summer I had an interview at Russel Stover Candies, when they called to tell me that the position was mine, they then informed me that I would have to pass a drug test before I could officially have the job. Although some jobs and people believe that drug testing in the workplace should take place, many people do not believe in drug testing. Opponents of WDT (Workplace drug testing) argue that the process of drug testing amounts to an unwarranted invasion of a person’s private life and their body. Some people believe that the statement “free consent” is impossible to obtain. Drug testing did not come into play in the United States until the late 1980’s as a part of the Reagan administration. Before that, there was no standard way for jobs, schools, and even sports to drug test employees, students, or athletes. People that had jobs working with heavy machinery or people that worked in the Department of Transportation were mainly the ones getting drug tested. The issues with drug

Some people may say that mandatory drug testing is a violation of the athletes’ Fourth Amendment right. According to some people, these tests are unnecessary and therefore violate these rights. The author of “Mandatory Drug Testing Violates Rights” believes that drug testing is a violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution; “Courts have ruled that drug tests are a search. A search is a privacy issue, and there has to be a reason for the search.” This is true. Drug tests are a search, and in some cases they may violate the rights of some citizens. Professional athletes, on the other hand, do not get their rights violated by this. This does not violate the Fourth Amendment because the athletes have already agreed to the rules of participating in the sport. Deborah Lee and Ann Griswold, authors of “Point: Athletes Should be Tested for Drugs” explains that “in none of these cases have athletes’ Constitutional rights been abrogated because the participation in athletic events is always voluntary and never mandatory. The ‘mandate’ only comes into play after the athlete has agreed to participate, thereby voluntarily agreeing to obey the rules of the sport.” This explains how the athletes have agreed to the rules of the activity, which in most cases prohibit the use of many performance enhancing substances, so since they have agreed to these conditions, the mandatory drug testing of athletes is not a violation of their rights. An athlete’s rights are not being violated by

Should drug testing be mandatory in the workplace? Many factors, including safety, productivity and reducing the number of employees who use drugs, enhance companies to do mandatory drug testing. On the other hand, many employees feel that drug tests are unfair, an invasion of privacy, and a violation of rights. Suppose an airline company had two pilots standing by their planes. The agency told the travelers that both pilots were flying the same route and that they could choose either plane. One pilot held a sign that said, “I am drug free”. The other pilot’s sign said, “I’m high on cocaine”. Which plane do you think most people would choose? Drug testing should be mandatory in the workplace.

The state spent $493,000 on drug testing for this fiscal year. It received 32,511 welfare applications and referred 636 for drug testing. Only twenty came back positive, although nearly two hundred people refused to comply. But even if all 200 were drug users, that still comes to more than $2,200 per positive result, which is more expensive than the median benefit in the state. (Benen 1)

One man is left dead and three other people are facing brain damage after they volunteered taking part in a drug test in Paris. 90 volunteer were given the drug in varying doses, and six of the volunteers have been hospitalized. All of the other volunteers are being contacted and tested for the same conditions.

In order to keep organization ethical as it relates to drug testing, the U.S. Supreme Court has approved four methods for drug testing. The organization can request a blood, breath, hair, or urine tests. These tests will not harm the job candidate or employee. The company will send the job candidate or employee to an off-site medical

If an employer is suspicious regarding a current employees' status, they are allowed by law to request or give a random drug test. In general, most courts do not need to hold a suspicion to randomly drug test unless there is a risk of damage or human injury involved. Although, in some state laws, there are private employers which are given the right to randomly test any employee without a reason. According Specifically to the Florida law, "An employer that conducts drug testing must give its policy to employees in writing, and employees must have at least 60 days’ notice of the policy".

In many years, companies adopted many programs to monitor substance abuse in the workplace. The implementation of drug testing by companies grew in recent years. American workers have seen a dramatic increase in the use of drug testing in the previous years. Drug testing is implemented to assure safe workplaces for American workers. Drug testing can reduce the company’s health care and insurance costs. Even though drug testing has become common in the workplace, there is little research that exists regarding this matter. Overall, drug testing affects the decisions of workers by adopting a “zero tolerance” policy. Experienced users try to beat these tests by using drug to cancel the tracking of the drug itself. These workers attempt to avoid the detection of drug use for long periods (Borack, 1995).

Workplace drug testing is important from the perspective of employees as well as employer as it benefits both. Studies show that there are beneficial results at workplace. This article discusses briefly the benefits of this measure.