Recently Radio Shack has undergone a makeover during the last year and the result has been a noticeable improvement in their prospects. Radio Shack has always been steady through the years. There seems to be franchises in every mall or around the corner. As of recent, Radio Shack has transformed their approach on the market place and is seeking new challenges. Upon reshaping their image, Radio Shack has seen their total net sales and operating revenue for 2009 increased to $4.28 billion compared with $4.22 billion for 2008. Most of this growth has resulted from focusing on mobility and wireless products from several different brands. Instead of providing wires and connectors for component stereos, Radio Shack is now configuring …show more content…
Companies with the most consistent earnings history or strongest growth prospects receive the highest P/E multiples. We calculate price targets for the current and next fiscal year by applying the stock 's current multiple to the average professional analyst 's estimate. Valuation using RadioShack 's current multiple (P/E): Fiscal Year | Est Low/High Price Range | Avg. Est. Price | % Change for Average | 12/2010 | 24.67-29.05 | 26.28 | 11.12% | 12/2011 | 24.82-30.66 | 27.74 | 17.29% | RadioShack current price: | 23.65 | RadioShack current multiple (P/E): | 14.60 | | RadioShack average 12/2010 estimate: | 1.80 | | RadioShack low 12/2010 estimate: | 1.69 | | RadioShack high 12/2010 estimate: | 1.99 | RadioShack average 12/2011 estimate: | 1.90 | | RadioShack low 12/2011 estimate: | 1.70 | | RadioShack high 12/2011 estimate: | 2.10 |
What 's the best guess for the stock if it were valued like its peers?
Investors often come to believe that a stock is undervalued or overvalued compared to other stocks in its industrial group. To calculate an alternate target price for the current and next fiscal year based on those beliefs, investors can apply the average PE multiple for a company 's industrial group to the average professional analyst 's earnings estimate for the company in those periods. Valuation using the industry 's
Swan-Davis, Inc. (SDI) manufactures equipment for sale to large contractors. The company was founded in 1976 by Tom Stone, the current chairman, and it went public in 1980 at $1 per share. The stock currently sells for $15, Stone owns 14 percent of the shares, and other officers and directors control another 13 percent. The industry is cyclical, and competition is strong, so profits are some-what unstable. Tables 1, 2, and 3 provide historical balance sheets, income statements, and ratios for the company for the period 1994–1996, Table 4 provides industry average data for 1994-1996, and Table 5 provides one security analyst’s forecasted data for the company based on assumptions
Despite competing in a broad market environment, JB Hi-Fi is able to outperform its competitor and placed them well ahead in the market gaining a large marker share. JB Hi-Fi tries to achieve its objectives of expanding its market share by adopting 3
Valuations depend on forecasts. The reliability of the forecasts will then depend heavily on complete analysis of the industry, in addition to the evolving changes in the economy. It also requires understanding of the business and financial characteristic of the industry.
The valuation process, in this case, requires us to estimate the short-run non-constant growth rate and predict future dividends. Then, we must estimate a constant long-term growth rate at which the firm is expected to grow. Generally, we assume that after a certain point of time, all firms begin to grow at a rather constant rate. Of course, the difficulty in this framework is estimating the short-term growth rate, how long the short-term growth will hold, and the long-term growth rate.
The management of JetBlue and its underwriters can also price the IPO using valuation multiples. JetBlue can employ the most current comparable data of the most appropriate competitors in terms of value in the airline industry. Valuation multiples that can be employed include, but are not limited to P/E multiples, EBIT multiples, EBITDA multiples. In this scenario, I choose to use Southwest airlines and Ryanair as the major benchmarks, because they are both considered as major low –fare airlines, and are key competitors in the United States and Europe. Nevertheless, I believe the P/E ratio is the stronger valuation tool to determine the true value of a firm. Using this method we come up with a share price of $19.32 for Southwest
Radio Shack has been thinking of changing branding strategies, and also have new marketing slogans. If they want to stay in business they should consider lowering prices and raising the quality of their products. Last year in 2015, Radio Shack had another bankruptcy, which forced them to make the decision of joining to Sprint. Radio Shack made a good decision by joining to Sprint that way they can receive different strategies to enhance their company and to better themselves. By making alliance with Sprint, Radio Shack hopes to increase their sales and improve their management approach. In my opinion, Radio Shack should have comparable prices to their competitors and should also improve management skills. They can also train their staff to be more friendly and helpful than the other
Most rely on valuation heuristics involving P/E, PEG, and price-to-sales . The simplicity of using heuristic triggers dependence on valuation heuristics as an alternative for the fundamental valuation. P/E, PEG, and price-to-sales need few variables and use simple formulas. Therefore , the estimates are rather perceptive THUS subject to bias. The cause of these biases arise from weak assumption made towards P/E, PEG, and price-to-sales inputs.
The share price of $270,000 was significantly higher because the “fair value” as perceived by the dissenters, which accounted for the chance of an IPO. Taking into account the recently traded Kohler Co. share prices, the book value of a share, and the possibility of an IPO greatly inflated what the perceived value of each share should be. While Kohler believed their voting control and ownership structure would remain the same, the shareholders believed otherwise. Because shareholders assumed Kohler would go public, they argued for a higher valuation so as to receive the highest price, and thus profit, in the buyout. So based on the highest MVE, we picked Masco as the comparable firm of choice. Using Masco’s MVE, $9838.8, and LTM EBIAT, $437.3, we solved for Masco’s P/E ratio, which was equal to 22.5. By multiplying the P/E ratio by Kohler’s LTM EBIAT (22.5 * $93.76), we projected a market value of $2,109,610,000. To solve for estimated share price, we divided the projected market value by 7,587.89, the number of shares outstanding to obtain an estimated share price of $278,023.47. This estimate is near the $270,000 per share offer price.
You would not buy a home, car or other large purchases without researching what product offered you the most for your money. The same is true when investing in a company. Investors do avid research on multiple companies to find what company matches the investors' criteria. In this paper Team C will research both AT&T and Verizon's financial documents. Team C will compare selected ratios, cash flow and make recommendations how both companies can manage cash flow for the future.
Second once Apple stabilized after year 2019, the prediction of growth is 3%, and Beta was projected to be .96. Again, by using the boundaries stated above: the (Ke), weight of equity/debt, and WACC were as follow 6.34%, 80%, 20%, and 5.63%. These numbers were somewhat similar to its high growth stage; therefore, signifying Apple is still a strong company once it stabilizes. Yet, another reason why Apple can provide such attractive returns. Conversely, finding the Terminal Value (Pt) of the company, which is the value of the company at a future year, projected the PV for stable growth, in this case it was 2020. The (Pt) was over $1 billion, yet again another reason why Apple creates a great investment opportunity. Moreover, by adding all of the PV, including the stable growth year, the intrinsic value of the firm is over $966 million and minus the current value of debt, Apple is still worth (value of equity) over $926 million. This equity divided the current number of shares outstanding; Apple’s intrinsic value of stock is $988.80 per share. By comparison the current stock price, which is $649.79 per share, the stock value is undervalued. Likewise, making (AAPL) a rewarding opportunity that must not be taken for granted.
b. What is Q’s stock worth per share? How does that value depend on the payout ratio and growth rate after year 4?
The current enterprise value is $41,335 million and the equity value is $34,455 million. According to yahoo finance, the shares outstanding of our company are 647.31 million, so we can calculate the stock price for next year is $53.23. It will increase in following years.
If the company did go public, its share price should be $384.37 for per share with the rapid growth scenario.
Google and Yahoo have a calculation of the P/E but both are different being $12.22 and $11.96 respectively at this current point in time. The main reason for the current difference in P/E is the discrepancy in earnings per share of $.10. To find historical P/E ratios for Target i have to do a google search and it brought up a site call YCharts. For the year of 2016 they do not give you an average but plotting a few point and finding an average I came up with about $12.84 for a ten year chart I would have had to sign up for a free trial but 2016 looked about average compared to pre 2014 when the stock was on a quick rise. Looking at a rough five year average of $17.97 the $11.92 is really low. In other words the current P/E is on the low side which may indicate a time to buy.