Aaron Denning
Dr. White
Race and Ethnicity
12/7/2017
Housing Discrimination Housing discrimination a thing of the past? Many people would believe that housing discrimination doesn’t happen anymore. Housing discrimination still happens today and although it might not be as common, or spoken about it. Housing discrimination is anytime a minority is refused housing because of their race or ethnicity. Refusing housing doesn’t just mean an apartment or, house that someone wanted to buy, but influencing where someone lives entirely by steering them places most commonly, or denying loans. Housing discrimination can also occur after someone has already moved into their new place and the other residents of the complex or neighborhood could start harassing them. Housing discrimination also doesn’t just occur in one place in the country but, all over it. It can also surprise people who think they are moving into a forward thinking community to only find out that they are denied housing because, of how they look. Housing discrimination is no longer a thing of the past and needs to seriously looked at in today’s world and changed for the better. The history of housing discrimination starts all the way back during WWII, and begins to affect education and health of those affected. What most importantly needs to happen are reforms in how housing is sold and bought so that there is less human interaction in who makes decisions. Housing discrimination is different than what it use to be
In the article “Does Race Matter in Residential Segregation” a look at the continuing pattern of segregation expressed by whites in their avoidance of neighborhoods with minorities is examined. Although this phenomenon can be seen as a racially influenced action alone, it is strongly debated that differences in socioeconomic status between minorities are causing whites to make their decisions to leave. To determine if this is correct, the writers of this article conduct a factorial experiment, where they used phone calls to ask respondents a hypothetical scenario regarding the purchase of a home, while controlling variables that were uncontrollable in other experiments. The experiment offered the respondent a randomly generated combination
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a) prohibits discrimination in the rental of housing based on a person 's “race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin.” Discrimination against victims of domestic violence constitutes sex discrimination.
In “The Complexities and Processes of Racial Housing discrimination” by Vincent J. Roscigno, Diana L. Karafin, and Griff tester, the main concept of racial disparity and inequality among neighborhoods is discussed, and how those inequalities became to be. They first highlight the wide range of potentially exclusionary practices, through qualitative and quantitative data comprised of over 750 verified housing discrimination cases (Roscigno, p. 162). Citing the U.S. Census, it is found that Blacks, compared to Hispanics and Asians, continue to experience high levels of residential segregation. This is done through discriminatory practices, whether they be by exclusionary or non-exclusionary methods. Even after the passing of the Fair Housing Act in 1988, discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics decreased somewhat, though African Americans still appeared to take part in racial steering, and Hispanics continued to have limitations in regards to opportunities and access to rental units (Roscigno, p. 163).
Rough Draft & Thesis Statement Minorities are faced with housing discrimination on levels much higher than that of white people which is considered white privilege. Residential segregation has been strategically planned and carried out by multiple parties throughout history and persists today ultimately inhibiting minorities from making any of the social or economic advances that come from living in affluent neighborhoods and communities. From our research, the scholarly sources have depicted multiple causes of racial disparity. Housing segregation perpetuates negative circumstances for people of color, as looked at through history, laws, segregation, real estate, and ... The end of the Civil War and the start of the Industrial Revolution and
George Lipsitz (1998) argues that both public policy and private prejudice have created a "possessive investment in whiteness" that is responsible for the racialized hierarchies of our society. He believes that “Whiteness” has a cash value: it accounts for advantages that come to individuals through profits made from housing secured in discriminatory markets, through the unequal educations allocated to children of different races, through insider networks that channel employment opportunities to the relatives and friends of those who have profited most from present and past racial discrimination, and especially through intergenerational
What I learned this week which I found most interesting is the evolving situation of housing segregation in this country. If I would have been asked why our country is still so segregated I would say that this situation is due to the fact that we had Jim Crow laws in effect only 60 years ago and many communities have just not changed that much since then. What I wouldn’t have guessed is the widespread extent to which the races intentionally segregate themselves. Less than 50% of both blacks and whites say they want to live in a community of people who look like them. However when people actually choose their home 74% of whites end up in white communities and 66% of blacks end up living in black communities. (Chang, Alvin) Whether it is basic
Therefore, it should be talked about and understood, so that the people are not kept in the dark, especially when they have not experienced it for themselves. I believe that understanding and admitting that the issues are accurate becomes a first step to solve the problems. It is disheartening that many minority groups and protected groups fall trap to these practices. What’s worse is that there are evidences that realtors and lenders restrict housing options based on the families’ race or background. These families are facing overt limited choices for housing in a nation that boasts liberty and opportunities. Clearly, there is something that needs to be fixed in the institution or society itself. Despite there being evidences and mandates to suppress discrimination, these actions still continue for businesses and corporations are granted certain leeway. Not saying that they should be limited in their business endeavors, but certain (stricter) regulations can be put in place to check these realtors and lenders that are supposed to serve the people and aid them in attaining the basic necessity of having a shelter. However, greed and supposition take the front seat when it comes to providing a home. Moreover, people’s perceptions also have a strong role in the encouragement of unfair activities in the housing market. To me, this poses a conundrum that is harder to
In 1968 Congress passed the Fair Housing Act of 1968, which prohibited discrimination concerning the sale, rental and financing of housing based on race, religion, national origin or sex. 50 years later and homeownership amongst minorities remain stagnant as they were when housing discrimination was legal in 1968. Since 2001 African American homeownership has decreased by 5 percent, while whites and other minority groups remain stagnant. Half a century later and homeownership rates remain the same for whites and minorities while African American homeownership rate continue to decline. The widest homeownership rates between Whites and and African-Americans occur in mostly northern cities such as Minneapolis, Minnesota and Buffalo, New York.(3)
There is still an unusual amount of two million cases of housing discrimination each year (Wikipedia). The National Fair Housing Alliance estimates that number to be closer to 4 million per year. Inappropriately, only seventeen of the cases went to court nationwide between the years 1989 and 1992 (Wikipedia). Studies show that minorities who apply for mortgages still have troubles are there rejected 3 times as much as Caucasians (Wikipedia). For instance, according to one Federal Reserve Board study, among higher income applicants, the denial rates were as high as 21% for African- Americans, 16% for Latinos, 11% for Asians and 8 and Caucasians (Wikipedia). In conclusion, the Fair Housing Act tried it’s best to eliminate housing discrimination and to provide structural equality. However, housing discrimination still exists but it is not as prevalent as it was before the
Since the end of the Second World War, the housing market had blossom throughout the nation. Thousands of the American people and veterans were able to finance a home; however, there were many who were not given the same or equal opportunities. In A Matter of Place, the documentary argued that people are still facing housing discrimination in the U.S. Housing discrimination persist because a couple were denied housing due to their race and a man was solely harassed based on his sexual orientation.
According to the Institute on Race and Poverty (IRP) in 2000 a white individual making the same income annually as any other race has a seventy-eight percent chance of owning a home, and only a twenty-two percent chance of having their credit denied on a loan, however, minorities like Blacks and Hispanics have a significantly lower chance of both. (Lawrence, and Keleher 3). In fact, Blacks with those same specifications only have a forty-eight percent chance to own a home, and an astounding forty-five percent chance to have their credit denied on a loan. Meanwhile, Hispanics have a forty-six percent chance to own a home, and a thirty-percent percent chance of having their credit denied. While this may seem overtly discriminatory with just a glance, one must first delve into what those numbers actually mean, and the details went into creating those numbers, as well as take a peek into the institution that created those numbers before jumping to the conclusion that it is empirically racist. Recently, racism has exploded into the spotlight worldwide, and especially in the United States of America with stories of racially motivated police brutality and a supposed “race war” taking center stage. All this coming forty-seven years after Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. sought to end racial tension and racist government
It'll convey some thoughtfulness regarding glorious, strikingly shifted and uncommon accumulations, for example, those of Daniel A.P. Murray. Murray brought about for Black History week. Thurgood Marshall, the National Association for the change of minorities and announcements to show something inventive and social, institutional and lawful history. Prejudice can crush us as an individual and at least harm the world. Prejudice is so deadly and decimating, it just gets played out into shamefulness, and the main issue is genocide. When you realize that bigotry prompts genocide, and fundamentally that is the thing that needs to happen, then you can spread out and sort of classifying alternate appearances on different matches that is a part of being racially biased, and because of that Dr. Poissaint pointed out, "These facts have for sure been the issue by the way people are overseen." He then moreover prompted the general population listening on how prejudice was played out in America all through isolation. For instance, blacks that went by medicinal services offices were not by any means given the
As children grow up, they become the person they turn out to be because of experiences and the culture and society they grew up in. Nations are affected in the same sense because the people living in a nation affect how the nation is influenced and builds its character.
We have issues: more specifically , the United States has issues, continuous and all-encompassing issues of racial inequality.The United States is experiencing a outburst of racism, as can be seen from the 2014 killings of two unarmed African-American men, to the brutality of white supremacy in Charleston and the string of arsons in black churches across the South. Of course, it’s nothing new for a nation with a long history of extreme racist violence—the most recent lynching-related death occurred in 1981, hardly a lifetime ago, when Michael Donald was hanged by two members of the Ku Klux Klan.The United States, however, continues to avoid its history on race, refusing to confront its past in a “post-racial,” “colorblind” society, and that policy of systemic ignorance is particularly strong when mention of racial equality is brought up. Although the concept of equality has never truly existed in this world, as can be traced back to the very beginnings of recorded history we see the nobles ruling the commoners, conquerors reigning over the conquered, the will of man dominating women; the United States needs to acknowledge the fact that racial inequality still exists within our country and has in no way progressed towards betterment.
Since the start of American history, immigrants came here and brought their traditions and cultures with them. The United States is a country of immigrants. It is a place where people from all over the world come to build a better life. Some immigrants bring their families. Others come alone with nothing but determination. Racial discrimination against minorities and immigrants is an underlying problem here in America today. Racism is seen in our daily lives when people are discriminated against because of their race and ethnicity. Racism attacks the right to a person’s well-being on the basis of something they have no control over. They cannot change nor should want to change who they are. Racial discrimination is not as bad as it was fifty years ago, but it still a problem here in our country today. Our country has advanced tremendously as far as modernization and technology, but has not improved on the way we treat minorities and immigrants. From African-Americans, Asians, Hispanics, and Arabs there is a form of discrimination against these group of minorities.