preview

Qualitative Study Critique

Good Essays

A Qualitative Study Critique - Task 1
Kimberly Cash
WGU
Evidence-Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research
C361

May 01, 2017 A Qualitative Study critique - Task 1
B1 – Article
Rullander, A., Isberg, S., Karling, M., Jonsson, H., & Lindh, V. (2013). Original Article: Adolescent’s Experience with Scoliosis Surgery: A Qualitative Study. Pain Management Nursing, 1450-59. Doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2010.07.005
Background or Introduction The stated purpose of the article was to evaluate not only pain control in adolescents who underwent a spinal fusion, but also the emotional/psychological and physical affect it had on them. Another stated purpose was to uncover the pre-operation education and preparedness for the surgery. Is it enough to prepare …show more content…

It seems essential that pain management as well as treatment of nausea be improved.” (Rullander, 2013, p. 58) It is well stated that pain control and nausea/vomiting needs to be controlled. There was also reference to whether PCEA which gives the patient the feeling of control. It is also shown “that the most effective analgesic method is a double epidural catheter with continuous infusion of ropivacaine.” (Rullander, 2013, p. 51). It is also mentioned that we need to take a holistic approach to treating these patients.
B3-Protection of human subjects and cultural considerations:
Fifteen children and adolescents were invited to join this study. Only six of them opted to participate. Informed consents were obtained from participants and guardians. Approval was also obtained from the University’s Ethical Review Board. The interviewer chosen had “extensive experience interviewing children about sensitive medical topics”. (Rullander, 2013, p. 52) The subjects were between the ages of 8 and 18 and all with idiopathic scoliosis. The inclusion of both genders was also taken into consideration. The participants that decided to join the study were two boys and four girls, all between the ages of 15 – 18. The time from surgery was approximately 2 years for all participants and the interviews were conducted away from the postoperative area. When the interview was over the participants were offered “the chance to change or clarify their narrative”. (Rullander, 2013, p.

Get Access