preview

Protestant Ethic Summary

Better Essays

Max Weber in chapter two of his book, The Protestant Ethic writes about the idea of a so call economic survival of the fittest. This notion along with the use of the citing of Benjamin Franklin’s holding of “time is money” struck me as particularly relatable. He speaks to this ethos of capitalism and how money brings about more money and that to wealth should be acquired at all necessary times. Laziness should be avoided at all times as that time could be used being put forth towards economic growth. This idea of economic survival of the fittest is not simply applicable to just economics but it can also be translated to all aspects of life including social life, political behavior, values, and choices. Expanding on my belief in the notion …show more content…

To be leisurely is to be lazy; something I disapprove of as does Weber. When someone is lazy, they are giving up the opportunity to achieve something. Furthermore, during that time that they are being lazy, someone else is growing economically, educationally, or in some other way while that person is actually falling behind. This is why I avoid laziness as much as possible spending as much time either on school work obtaining knowledge, in the gym obtaining a better and healthier self, or at work becoming a better employee. All of these activities yield the possibility for more growth …show more content…

An example that I have been a part of is my dad actually losing money over the course of the year after getting a raise because he jumped into a higher tax bracket. To me, this seems counterintuitive because it is actually encouraging him to not work as hard so he does not get a raise. Additionally, it is encouraging someone to be lazy because they will not have to pay as high of tax rate. Furthermore, I do not agree with the idea of giving tax breaks to the rich because they will invest that into companies which will high more people. Otherwise, known as the trickle-down effect. Although it does encourage people to work hard and achieve that level, it does not work and only makes them richer. It also does not provide for a cohesive society as we see today with the one percenters versus the ninety nine other

Get Access