preview

Prosody And Fetal Alcoholic

Decent Essays

There is an old saying by Maya Angelou, “people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel” (A quote by Maya Angelou). This ties in a lot to prosody. But, how? People may not remember exactly what you said but how you said it can really affect someone’s perception of you. Prosody helps people understand different emotions a speaker is trying to convey. It shows the patterns and rhythm of speech that aids the speaker in channeling sarcasm or stresses a focus of a part of a sentence, something entirely unique to language not found in writing. What happens when people who have disorders or brain damage that prevents them from understanding or conveying prosody? Prosody is the …show more content…

The investigation took place because it is widely known that even alcoholics who have detoxed have expected difficulties in terms of neuropsychological ability (Monnot et al., 2001). Those who have been affected prenatally also experience cognitive skills. This being, individuals from all a cross the board: 32 alcoholics with no evidences of fetal alcohol exposure, nine subjects with fetal alcohol exposure who were recovering alcoholics, two fetal alcohol subjects with no disorder regarding alcohol and 41 controls were used in this study (Monnot et al., …show more content…

The later assessment analyzes the prosodic functioning in individuals with a range of disorders, most commonly patients with aphasia. In this test certain sentences are said with variety of emotions, the text provides the example "I am going to the other movies". The speaker saying the sentence varies in several emotions such as happiness sadness anger disinterest or surprise. The use of prosody assists conveying the emotional intent. Then monosyllabic and asyllabic utterances were also said with those same six emotional convictions. The final segment of the assessment asked subjects to determine weather sentences were of the same emotion or different (Monnot et al., 2001). In terms of accuracy, the individuals who were the control scored higher than alcoholic individuals, 93% to 79%. Both of these scores are higher than the 62% those with fetal alcohol exposure identified correctly (Monnot et al., 2001)). One of the glaring limitations of this study is the low number of participants with fetal alcohol exposure compared to those who do not have the exposure. In either case, the results are peculiar. One of the major ramifications of having lower accuracy in prosody reception could be the decreased social ability (Monnot et al.,

Get Access