Pros And Cons Of The NSA Privacy Invasion

Furthermore, the government spying on its citizens is a huge violation of the rights they are granted. Privacy is a person’s right as a human being, however, privacy is also a privilege. If a

Although the NSA does not monitor everyone all the time, there is a good chance that almost everyone who has some piece of technology has unknowingly been surveilled at one time. Government monitoring of everyone is unconstitutional in regards to the 4th amendment, as it violates a persons right “... to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,” (US Const. amend.

Imagine a world where every step, every movement, every thought was tracked. The world is evolving faster than people can think, and not all for the good. As the science and technology of the 21st century continues to grow and expand, so do the corresponding fields such hacking, wiretappings, and general anti-privacy. The government has continually been using these developing areas to track its citizens at all cost. The constant belligerence of the government's wiretappings have warranted a closer look at this invasion privacy. Under the scapegoat of terrorist tracking, law enforcements continue to cover their steps. Although wiretappings have given aid in a few certain

Many companies have gathered personal information online to target ads with the user’s preferences, but tracking can allow companies to find out your credit card number, where you live and your interests. Hence, the NSA should be incriminated for utilizing personal information that can endanger a person’s security by using information from social networks, experimenting and distributing information.

Citizens do not always fully understand legislation before becoming angry at someone. Who better to point a finger at than their government (Zuckerman para 7)? Despite the actual legal terms on surveillance, innocent citizens feel that they have had their rights violated and wonder why the government needs their information if they have nothing to hide. The supreme court declared in the third party doctrine that “anyone turning over information to a third party, such as a bank or Internet service provider, has no right to object if that information is later shared with the government” (Timberg para 11). Whether they understand the law or not, most people feel that their information should not be unnecessarily subjected to the government without their voiced approval (Zuckerman para 6). “Quite simply, the administration could have done a much better job of explaining both the potential and the limits of data mining. It should have made it clear

The reason they’re allowed to continue surveillance on the public is because of what 's known as the Patriot Act. This act is what allows the NSA to carry out their

Did you ever know that even in the privacy of your own room, you are being tracked by the government? The National Surveillance Agency (NSA) has been tracking Americans more specifically since 9/11 to prevent more attacks upon America. President George W. Bush felt the need to implement it after the traumatic incident, and domestic surveillance includes the tracking of credit cards, phones, internet, and much more. Some might think that their privacy is being neglected, while others feel surveillance is necessary. Domestic surveillance worsens society because it is illegal, invades privacy, and takes away human rights.

we should look towards getting a law passed that permits people to choose whether or not they wish to be monitored by the NSA, and to have those people who refuse to be documented under their notice.

The New York Times addresses that your phone is being tracked by the government, they explain the government supervises through our phones as well through our messages.. (Maass,Rajagopalan 66). This is another example that the government is starting to get more and more access to popular accessories that citizens use to spy on them. “...Google’s privacy protections are false he supports this claim by stating law enforcement agencies seem to have easy access to the data.” (Henderson 72). This article shows how websites claiming to protect your information give law enforcement easy access to invade your privacy and obtain your information. The discussion of power and control of the government seen in George Orwell’s 1984 almost directly parallels the government in our modern day society. Technology is used to exploit the unaware citizens under the government. Resources given to those with legal power use this power with an illegal advantage.The violation of the 4th amendment by the government shows how our private rights are being

The National Security Agency has caused much controversy over the manner in which they protect the nation. It was revealed that the NSA has been reaching necessary lengths to keep citizens safe from the threats of terrorism, bombings, and murders, amongst others. But many citizens are angry and concerned about how far the NSA has gone to protect everyone. The NSA has analyzed private information of billions of phones, computers, and surveillance cameras. The N.S.A. watches and records Americans’ phone calls and internet data, following and intercepting in the lives of people in the most remote parts. The situation clearly makes American citizens uncomfortable, and some argue that the NSA has crossed the line by invading the “privacy” of

After the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001, an American public was shocked, flabbergasted, and lost for words for the first time since Pearl Harbor. Out of these fears the PATRIOT act was conceived; promising to help stop future terrorist plots the bill was initially met with high praise from the public and media. It was not for another decade that the side-effects of the patriot act were revealed to the world. The American public was appalled at the circumvention of their fourth Amendment rights. Still there is a clear divide between those who believe that the National Security Agency Is not violating the constitution and what they are doing is good for the betterment of the country and those who believe that their privacy and undeniable American freedoms were violated in part of the NSA spying with both parties bringing their own views and ideals to the field. The September eleventh attacks were the beginning of the end of privacy for American citizens the PATRIOT act which was signed a month later granted full access to the phones and computers of the people. It took over a decade for the public to become aware of the illegal spying that the NSA had conducted. The NSA spying is a complicated and controversial matter while there have been several judicial courts that have ruled against the spying there has also been just as many cases of the court 's finding the spying constitutional.

"Government surveillance of its citizen's internet activity has caused an uproar among the masses and has become the source of numerous protests. The government, the NSA in particular monitors a number of things on the internet including metadata, emails, instant messages, and social media posts. It may come as a surprise to people, but this activity is currently legal. Although it is legal, does it coincide with the first amendment right listed in the U.S Constitution? If a law is deemed unconstitutional, is it still legal? America fought for many years in order to gain its independence from Great Britain and made it clear to the entire world that we are The Home of the Free. America’s contradicting actions have some people questioning whether or not they are truly “free”.

November 4, 1952. World War II had just ended with the Allied Forces claimed as the victors, mass hysteria flooded the United States of America and the president was tasked with creating an organization that prevented brutal attacks from being executed to the American people (Frequently…). The president at the time, Harry S. Truman, established what has in recent light become one of the most controversial American governmental agencies known as the National Security Agency, NSA for short. Recent leaks by the likes of Edward Snowden and court cases have shown citizens that allowing the government to track all of their information has not helped prevent terrorist actions. America as a whole needs to realize that spying, the one thing that it so heavily despises, is the thing that is taking our freedom away. If the government has access to all personal information, what is going to stop a hacker from getting that? It is one thing to submit and allow for your information to be tracked, but to have your consent taken away does not justify the “safety” provided. It’s clear to see that since its conception, the NSA has allowed far too many attacks to occur while strengthening its spying power. Let’s first delve into why the NSA was created and what their purpose is/was.

The government looks at our emails, text messages, listens to our phone calls and other similar communication devices. “The U.S. has led a worldwide effort to limit individual privacy and enhance the capability of its police and intelligence services to eavesdrop on personal conversations. The campaign has had two legal strategies. The first made it mandatory for all digital telephone switches, cellular and satellite phones and all developing communication technologies to build in surveillance capabilities; the second sought to limit the dissemination of software that provides encryption, a technique which allows people to scramble their communications and files to prevent others from reading them” (Solove). How much of this did you know about? Almost all of our current devices already have technology that makes it an easy access for the government to know about all of your conversations.

Ever since the American public was made aware of the United States government’s surveillance policies, it has been a hotly debated issue across the nation. In 2013, it was revealed that the NSA had, for some time, been collecting data on American citizens, in terms of everything from their Internet history to their phone records. When the story broke, it was a huge talking point, not only across the country, but also throughout the world. The man who introduced Americans to this idea was Edward Snowden.