Pros And Cons Of The EPA

The EPA stands for the Environmental protection agency. Their job is to protect the people and environment from anything that can be harmful that they can control. It makes sense that they want to ban all

The environmental protection agency has been stepping up its mandate of ensuring safer and better environment for not only the business operators, buts also the society as a whole. In order to achieve this goal of environmental protection, there has been the creation of environmental protection agency that has ensured that all the businesses, irrespective of their size and type, strive to ensure that the environment is protected for the benefit of current and future generations.

The Environmental Protection Agency currently has a policy to limit the construction of power plants to clean burning natural gas systems in an effort to reduce carbon dioxide gasses in the atmosphere. Many utility companies have become reluctant to build new power plants because of this policy and California has experiences a 500-600% increase in utility rates over a one year period. There are many pros and cons to this EPA Policy, some of which have environmental and social impacts.

The environment is an extremely important aspect of our nation today. American families have the legitimate right to an excellent quality of air, that we breathe. As a nation, Americans gravitate towards the pursuit of the prodigious dollar, before our environmental issues. This is a practice that has an urgency to be stopped, immediately. The pollution that is created by personnel transportation and the trucking industry is destroying our planet. The government has the Clean Air Act of 1970, but it is not satisfactory enough. America should be obligated to push for electric transportation and an electric trucking industry.

Greenpeace started in 1969 when a group of Vancouver -area environmentalists gathered in establishing the “Don’t Make a Wave Committee” (Rex Weyler, 2004). “This committee was founded in response by the frustrated Sierra Club members, because the organization they felt an affinity with, refused to protest against nuclear weapons testing” (Lee, 1995: 8).

* “United States Environmental Protection Agency”, this is the Governmental organisation responsible for waste disposal and recycling in the whole of United States of America.

On August 3, 2015, President Obama announced new carbon pollution standards for power plants under the Clean Power Plan (CPP).[1] The purpose of the plan was to decrease carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to promote better air quality. This plan will impact not only coal fired power plants and the coal industry, but also individuals who live around them and the greater populous. This paper seeks to answer if such a plan should go forward and the impacts of such a plan on the parties listed above. To answer this question, this paper will look

By the year 2020, the Amendments to the Clean Air Act passed in 1990 will have prevented 230,000 early deaths, and saved the country around 2 trillion dollars. This is compared to the costs of the amendments, which the EPA calculated to be approximately 65 billion dollars. The study does not just stop at the monetary benefits and costs, but it also even dives into the number of prevented emergency room visits, and lost work and school days. With all of this information, the EPA makes it very clear the countless benefits to the United States that the Clean Air Act Amendments are having and will have in the

Many will think that this would be a positive addition to infrastructure and be nature-friendly with government regulations to prevent over polluting. That same thought would be flawed, because regulations are not always created with wildlife or citizens in mind. Take for example, Newmont Mining, an American based mining corporation. Newmont Mining was accused of high levels of environmental pollution of the Buyat Bay as the result of gold mining in Sulawesi. Five Newmont executives were arrested and charged with pollution; however, only one was tried and found innocent. Although environmentalists continue to claim that the company polluted the bay with high levels of toxic mercury and arsenic; tests have proven the levels are within alleged safety limits. The same company has been accused of similar offenses in Peru. (Katz, 2012, p. 108) This example illustrates the relationship between corporations and regulations set by governments. Although it is undeniable that Newmont Mining was contaminating the Bayut Bay and other various locations, no one can legally be held accountable for the harm done to populations in those areas. Tactics such as foreign exploitation and government bribery or lobbying are often utilized to trample nature and humans

citizens to follow to make our world safer and to protect it for the future

The Clean Water Act (CWA) founds the elementary structure for regulating releases of contaminants into the water bodies of the US and also for surface waters it regulates quality standards. The origin of the CWA was passed in 1948 and was named the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, then the Act was suggestively reorganized and prolonged in 1972. as "Clean Water Act" this became the Act 's communal name after amendments in 1972.Further down to CWA, EPA has applied other pollution control agendas such as for industry, the setting wastewater standards. We similarly have set some water quality standards for all pollutants in surface waters.

Enacted in 1972, the Clean Water Act was formulated with the goals of putting the end to the discharging of high quantities of contaminated materials into water resources, and further prevent pollution of water , and making sure that surface waters met the standards needed to support human and agricultural usage. Essentially, the Clean Water Act stipulates the fundamental structure used in the regulation of discharges of toxic pollutants into water resources of the US and ensuring conformance of quality standards for groundwater (Environmental Protection Agency). The Clean Water Act was draws based on the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948, which was later developed and revised in 1972 to the Clean Water Act. Under the Clean Water Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is authorized to implement programs to control pollution example being the establishment of standards for wastewater discharge for various industries. In addition, the CWA establishes the water quality standards applicable to all groundwater contaminants. The Clean Water Act makes it illegal to unload any contaminant material from a point source into navigable water bodies without acquiring permit from EPA. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit program, under the EPA, helps in controlling discharges (Environmental Protection

Pollution is, without doubt, a serious global issue that needs attention and resolutions. As human technologies improve, water, land, air, noise, and light pollutions are all inevitable. Five and a half million deaths each year is caused by air pollution. More than a million sea birds and mammals are killed each year by water pollution. Hundreds of dolphins and whales are killed each year by noise . These shocking facts all shows the significance of enforcing laws to ensure all people are taking care of our environment by decreasing the amount of pollution.

Protecting the environment is crucial to life on earth. The EPA ( Environmental Protection Agencies) mission is to protect human health and the environment. EPA was founded on December 2, 1970 to work for a cleaner, healthier environment for the American Citizens.

Environmental wellbeing is a global concern and every country is struggling to ensure that they have been able to protect the environment in an effective way. The development in many nations has been a cause of environmental pollution. This is because with the growth of industries and factories comes with the increase of waste products. If the waste products are not well managed, the environment will be polluted. This has negatively affected the lives of human beings, animals, and the plants. Environmental protection is essential to ensure that polluting has been reduced. The reduction of environmental pollution requires the input and the participation of the society, the business community, the government and the individual persons. People should be able to take personal responsibilities and ensure that they have managed their wastes effectively to ensure sustainable development. The government should ensure that it has committed itself in maintaining environmental protection for the benefit of its current and future generation through proper regulation and the effective implementation of the regulations which have been developed (Jambeck et. al, 768).