preview

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

Decent Essays

“Articles of Confederation was an written agreement summarizing the agreement between different parties the federalist and the anti-federalist”.

Federalist wanted to ratify the constitution,and Anti-federalist did not want to ratify it. One big issue they had was the concern of adding the “Bill of Rights”. The Federalist felt like it was unnecessary because, they believed the Constitution should only limited the government not the people. The Anti-federalist felt like the Constitution gave central government too much power.

This document was adopted by the Congress(the central government) it was the first constitution of the United States, on November 15,1777. However, the Articles of Confederation was ratified by all thirteen states. As being new Americans the people decided on what form their new government will take. Articles of Confederation was not perfect, it required Congress to regulate the military. The articles created a loose confederation of states and created a weak central government, leaving most of the …show more content…

However, Congress drafted first constitution in 1777 knowing Americans would be feared of a powerful national government. Weakness the Article faced were national government could not force the states to obey it laws, Congress lacked strong and steady leadership, did not have power to enforce laws, and each state could put tariffs on trade between states.(A tariff is tax on goods coming in from another state or country.) Many weakness caused states to argue among themselves. Events that lead to Articles of Confederation is that they faced many problems such as, Congress had no control over taxes. Also, states refused to give the government money that was needed. After the Articles lead to many issues government didn’t have any money to pay off the debts. However, under the Articles it was only one unicameral

Get Access