preview

Pros And Cons Of Prince Hamlet

Decent Essays

Would anybody that is truly insane ever actually claim to others that he or she is insane (or pretending to be insane), as Prince Hamlet did to his trusted companions Horatio and Marcellus? Most likely not, as such a person probably would not be able to realize the extent of his or her delusion on his or her own, and therefore would stubbornly deny that he or she is in fact crazy. Furthermore, would any truly mad individual ever, if given a relatively easy opportunity to take his or her revenge against someone who had committed great wrongs against him or her (and therefore caused the individual to fall into insanity in the first place), take the time to evaluate the pros and cons of taking revenge at that time – as Prince Hamlet did while his hated uncle Claudius (who had apparently killed Hamlet’s father, the king of Denmark, taken the Danish throne for himself, and even married Hamlet’s mother Gertrude in the process) was attempting to pray for forgiveness for his wicked deeds and …show more content…

Certainly not – a truly insane person would have taken his or her revenge immediately on impulse (of course, unless he or she had become so crazy that all of his or her memories or senses had been lost) without even fully realizing the details of the situation. These examples, as well as Hamlet’s purposefully disheveled appearances before his former love Ophelia, his playful conversation with Ophelia’s father (and Claudius’s adviser and lackey) Polonius, and his actions after his murder of Polonius, seem to show that the madness displayed by Hamlet during several key parts of Williams Shakespeare’s famous tragic play Hamlet was not real, but feigned. Despite this, many common readers (and audiences) of Shakespeare’s Hamlet are still often left believing that the titular Prince Hamlet’s supposedly feigned “antic disposition” is actually genuine

Get Access