Pro Euthanasia Argumentative Essay

Euthanasia is the act of administering a medication that intentionally kills patients, in a painless way, who are in a battle against terminal illness. It gives those who are both mentally and physically weak the option to end their sufferings, which can lead to abusive behavior of this medication. The act of administering euthanasia forces doctors to put a value on someone’s life in order to use this medication which makes their job immensely stressful. Also, the act of euthanasia gives off negative energy to those suffering by making a society devalue their lives to the point where euthanasia seems like the best option rather than living. Societies, professionals,

Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. Euthanasia is referred to the

Euthanasia is a term derived from a Greek word meaning "happy or fortunate in death." It is most commonly used now to denote the "merciful" infliction of death [either actively or passively] to avoid torment in fatal and incurable disease, usually by consent of the patient or his family.

Euthanasia is defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. The word “Euthanasia” comes from the greek “eu” meaning well or goodly + “thanatos” meaning death, translating to good death. In the majority of countries euthanasia or assisted suicide is against the law. It carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison in the UK. In the USA the law varies in some states.

Euthanasia by definition means, “the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering” (www.merriam-webster.com). This can be very misleading since there are different types such as voluntary, involuntary, nonvoluntary, active, passive and what is considered assisted suicide. Voluntary euthanasia is pretty self explanatory because it would be when you actually voluntarily ask and want your life to be ended. Involuntary however, would be the type that would go against a patient 's expressed wishes,

Euthanasia defined by Merriam-Webster’s as “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (such as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy” (Merriam-Webster) and it comes from the Greek language meaning “good death” (Grimag). Euthanasia can also be referred to as “mercy killing”, which is taking the life of a hopelessly ill or injured individual to end his or her suffering (Wekesser, pg. 12). It gives the patient and their family relief when their quality of life is low and allows the patient to “die with dignity” (Grimag). It is another example of freedom of choice. Euthanasia is a comfortable and pain-free way to end suffering. Whichever way you define it or refer to it, the practice of Euthanasia is a very controversial issue in the field of healthcare (Grimag). Euthanasia should be practiced today because we want to preserve life and get the most out of it, but not to prolong the experience of death (Wekesser, pg. 40).

Long before medicinal advances, more dramatic measures were taken to help those who lived with incurable diseases, with the excruciating pain that accompanied those diseases, and with the inability to attain any value of life due to disease or uncontrollable pain. Now, as one of the most controversial topics, study and research on euthanasia is becoming more widespread in the medical world. Though some believe euthanasia is immoral or unjust, and those who are against it seek to stigmatize it; no definitive line can be drawn as to whether euthanasia is morally “good” or “bad” or “right” or “wrong.” In other words, the topic of euthanasia is not a simplistic one, but rather one which requires great consideration, contemplation, and evaluation. If the presumption, or belief, that universal morals do exist prima facie, then one can conclude that the practice of euthanasia, no matter what form, is indeed, morally upstanding. In the case of euthanasia, universal morals consist of, but are not limited to, the following: human dignity, an individual’s right to self-determination, accepting a duty of care (for self and others, which can fall under having compassion as well), and respect for the autonomy of others. Thus, it is permissible to actively kill a patient with or in the absence of their consent under specific circumstances, only after all universal morals have been considered, assuming that universal morals exist.

Euthanasia is the process by which individuals are put to death painlessly. The word “Euthanasia” originates from a Greek word that means “good death.” There are several other names that are utilized in places of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide or mercy killing. Euthanasia is an acceptable process in many countries, but should be legal everywhere. Individuals have the legal right to choose whether they want to live or die. (Anderson)

Euthanasia is the act of intentionally ending a person’s life in order to end pain and suffering. A person who typically undergoes euthanasia has an incurable condition or clear chronic depression. Many people confuse euthanasia for the term ‘assisted suicide’, which is the act of encouraging or assisting a person to kill themselves.

Euthanasia is, by textbook definition, the painless killing of a patient suffering due to an incurable and painful disease or an irreversible coma. Euthanasia is not just death, but it is caused by what was done or what was not done to prevent death. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing or assisted suicide, it is currently legal in California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington; its status is still being disputed in Montana, however it is illegal in most countries across the world. Many people strongly oppose euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide as it questions the ethics and morality, but there are those who are in favor of it as it is a means of ending a life without pain.

Euthanasia is a very controversial and sensitive topic because of the ethical, legal, and moral issues of it. In the United States alone, it is illegal almost everywhere, however; it’s legal in Colorado, Vermont, Montana, Washington D.C., Oregon, Washington, and California. But, what exactly is euthanasia? Euthanasia can be categorized in three different ways; voluntary euthanasia, non-voluntary euthanasia, and involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is when a patient agrees to receive assistance to end his or her own life, which is legal in some places around the globe. Non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when the consent of the patient is not available. For example, if an individual is in a coma or vegetative state, they are physically incapable of giving consent. Involuntary euthanasia happens when an individual decides to end a patient's life without asking for consent, or doing it against the patient’s will. This can also be considered murder. Initiating euthanasia can be in the forms of, but not limited to, injections, drugs, Nitschke’s suicide pill, and dehydration, all of which vary in pain. In addition, it is estimated that we spend approximately 20-30% of insurance money to the terminally ill. Despite being seen as ethically wrong, the legalization of voluntary euthanasia can be beneficial and great around the world, because it prevents gory and horrific deaths, can be the key for terminally ill people to avoid agonizing and intense pain, and it can

Euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending a person's life to relieve suffering. Non-voluntary euthanasia, is when a person is unable to give their consent to treatment (for example, because they're in a coma) and another person takes the decision on their behalf, often because the ill person previously expressed a wish for their life to be ended in such circumstances. Hastening the death of a person by altering some form of support and letting nature take its course is known as passive euthanasia.

I would define euthanasia as the act or method of causing death painlessly to end suffering. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, is considered a viable option by some people when extreme suffering from an incurable, painful, disease or condition makes life intolerable. There are 2 types of euthanasia – self induced assisted suicide or physician assisted suicide (PAS) allowing death without interference by either withholding medical treatment or providing the means to end life in a dignified non-painful manner.

“Primum non nocere”, a phrase that all doctors must recite, modernly translates to “first, do no harm”. When students graduate from medical school they must recite the Hippocratic Oath. Taking this oath is a historical tradition that requires the physician to swear to preserve certain ethical standards. Although the text states that a doctor must never take a life, it also states that a doctor must help a person to the fullest extent. A difficult ethical question arises when the only way to help a person is by ending their suffering. Is euthanasia then the ethical solution? The ability for doctors to perform assisted suicides for the terminally ill is very controversial. Many people oppose the idea on the belief that all life is sacred. In reality, however, the real question is whether a patient can make that determination for themselves and decide whether a life of constant and permanent suffering is worth living. Euthanasia allows a patient to die with dignity; it frees up funds and equipment that can be put towards other patients in dire need of attention; and it ends the suffering of patients and their families. If the goal is to reduce pain and suffering then we need to seriously consider legalising euthanasia.

Some believe that euthanasia should be ethically viewed similarly to suicide because of the idea of choosing to end one’s own life, which is considered unethical. However, some oppose this belief, and believe