The ISHR, International Society for Human Rights, launched a series of print campaigns back in January of 2008 to advocate the rights of Muslim women in the Middle East. “Stop the oppression of women in the Islamic world” and “Some women need a change of view”. The ISHR is “an independent, non-governmental organisation dedicated to promoting and protecting human rights.” (Source: ISHR website 2017) The ISHR support defenders of human rights, underpin human rights initiatives, as well as lead and participate in coalitions for human rights change. This distinctive, movement campaign was put together at Grabarz & Partner, by creative directors Ralf Heuel and Dirk Siebenhaar. The image embraces and captures such gravitas and passion which …show more content…
Raihan Ismail is a lecturer in Middle East Politics and Islamic Studies at the Australian National University. In an interview with ABC Radio Canberra - Explainer: Why do Muslim women wear a burka, niqab or hijab? (Source: James Vyver, 2017) Dr Ismail stated "Some women wear it because they strongly believe it is their religious obligation," Dr Ismail also acknowledged that in some circumstances women might be compelled into concealing themselves from public view. "There is a possibility that some husbands would tell their wives 'wear the niqab, I don't want any other men to see you' which is possessive," she said. Such instances, where the freedom and rights of a Muslim woman are challenged is the driving power behind the campaign published by the ISHR. In this context, the representation of the burqa therefore can be controversial as a symbol of persecution and domination of gender roles in the Middle East.
In the image, we can see that a woman has metaphorically been imprisoned through the cloths that she has been possibly forced to wear. The use of prison bars placed through her eye-line suggests that the woman has a lesser status, similar to that of a criminal. To analyse the image according to Ferdinand de Saussure, here we have a classic example of the signified and signifier in place working together to create an interpretation of meaning in the viewers mind which makes them think critically of the design in a way that
“I wear it to work. I wear it to school,” she told The Signal about her niqab. “Many people have this misconception that, as Muslim women, we’re oppressed or forced to wear it. For me, it’s a choice. My parents never forced me to wear it.”
In Iran, where wearing the hijab is mandatory, women have been photographed waving their white hijabs as a sign of protest of their unequal treatment (Mohammed, 2018). Even as a woman in Canada, writer Yasmin Mohammed (2018) felt oppressed by her family forcing her to wear the hijab and niqab. However, some people like Zunera Ishaq (2015) take exception to the assumption made that because she wears the niqab it signifies that she is oppressed. Ishaq (2015) states that it is “precisely because I won’t listen to how other people want me to live my life that I wear the niqab” (par. 3). Thus, to Ishaq wearing of the niqab in Canada is not a symbol of oppression, but a symbol of her freedom to express her identity and religion in a way that she chooses.
“The Hijab limits me from doing certain things. When I have the Hijab on…as a Muslim woman, I consider myself basically representing the whole community” (Ruby 29). Aspects like this set this woman apart from her peers because she is now labeled as just one thing, a Muslim, when in fact she is much more than that. Women who wear the Hijab, Muhajibah, living in the western world, I believe, have it harder than they do living back home. Here, they are subject to a lot more attention when not necessary such as weird looks walking down the street and subject to stereotypes ie. being a terrorist. Islamic women are not the only ones being oppressed by their choice of clothing; in fact every woman around the world is target towards oppression. Islamic women are just targeted more than women of other religions. This is because of the strict faith that they endure from the Qu’ran telling them that they need to dress a certain way. However, it has been debated that the Qu’ran actually doesn’t mention anything about a women needing to wear a Hijab to be a good Muslim. (Kawaji)
In her article, “The Veil in Their Minds and Our Heads: The Persistence of Colonial Images of Muslim Woman,” Homa Hoodfar explains that western society’s view of the Islamic veil is one of imprisonment of women by their male counterpart, which limits their daily lives and opportunities, such as studies and jobs. However, Hoodfar states that is a very racist stereotype of Islamic woman. Hoodfar and many other Iranian women see the veil as a religious choice that also beautifies them while keeping them modest. The veil also gives them certain powers over men, which in turn gives them independence from men (Hoodfar, 11).
In many Muslim countries, women lack equality and basic rights as there is still social pressure for the unveiled to conform. According to people, if they don’t wear “niqab” they are not being good Muslims. Many women wish to go unveiled but cannot as in some places its illegal, and in other places they face murder, beating and other domestic violence. It is believed that if you are wearing niqab one can’t
People are known to stereotype one other. This article brings to light the fact that people don’t take the time to understand different cultures and just automatically assume things. A burka is not worn by all muslim women and in different countries they have very different meanings. In Turkey wearing one represents your want to overthrow the government by others, whereas most women wear them solely for their god and not for anyone else. Muslim women are no different then American. They are all unique and have their own beliefs and contribute to society and have educations just like the rest of us.
Stop the Oppression of Women is a visual ad created by the ISHR, the International Society for Human Rights. The ISHR is a non-governmental, non-profit organisation that focuses on trying to improve the quality of human rights across the world. This visual focuses on the oppression of women in Islamic countries where hijab, the traditional veil that Islamic women are required to wear. There are a few main points of rhetoric to analyze from this advertisement from the ISHR, including the ethos, logos, and pathos of the visual.
Within the Middle East, the largest population of the men and women are Muslim. The Muslim religion suggests that women wear a veil or hijab, which is a head scarf that only exposes a woman’s eyes, accompanied by a burqa which is a full body cloak. The sole purpose of the clothing is to cover a woman’s feminine features from men’s eyes. The Qur’an, an Islamic scripture, supports and slightly obligates the uniform by saying that women are to be conservative, “let them wear their head covering over their bosoms, and not display their ornaments.” (Qur’an). It could be inferred that women wear the burqa and veil willingly because of their geographical location. However, when Muslim women are withdrawn from the Middle East, and are placed
Burqa bans are unlawfully stripping Muslim women of their right to follow and show their commitment to their religion. Many countries in the United Nations are beginning to put a nationwide ban on wearing burqas in public. This restricts Islamic women by giving them the choice to either defy their religion, or stay inside their house and not get anything done. Not only does this restrict daily activities, but it makes it challenging for islamic women to get a quality education. Overall, countries are putting a national ban on niqabs, forcing muslim women to betray their religious beliefs in order to perform simple activities.
It did not occur to me that the women would want to wear them and felt as if they were protected and had a sense of closeness to their religion from them (Croucher, 2008). My ignorance of how Muslim women felt about wearing the head garments contributed to the idea that Muslim men oppress Muslim women. In class, we discussed how being educated about Islam allowed us to think outside the stereotype that Muslim men oppressed their women. Although many of the Muslim women want to wear head garments, there are still some that do not and France’s ban protects these women from being harmed or persecuted by those who disagree (Body-Gendrot, 2007). One of the articles mentioned that some of the women began wearing head garments because when traveling through certain areas of the city, they would be attacked if they were not wearing one (Wyatt, 2003). Women should not be subjected to crime just because they do not cover up a part of their body. Therefore, I was fine with France’s ban because it protected those that could not protect themselves. However, there are more women who want to wear head garments compared to those who do not, and because the majority of the women want to wear them, they are protesting the
Knowing that a Muslim women veiling herself can change people's opinions. That just by dressing and acting in accordance with her beliefs. Muslim women can be a positive symbol of something is one of the most empowering feelings in the world. From Morocco to Iran, as well as in Europe and North America, veiling has come to show the differences between the West and Islam (John 2745). The veiling of a Muslim women is her choice and identity to the world. Similar to Christians and the cross or the national
Everyone has rights and freedoms, and we all want those to be respected. For Muslim women, the burqa is a way to feel safe and protected. They feel less likely to be sexually assaulted when they are out in public. Many of these women believe only their husbands should see their body, and they have the right to believe this. A woman should be allowed to choose what she wears and how much of her body is revealed to others. Many women go out into public with very little clothing on, so Muslim women should be allowed to go out covered with a burqa. Muslim women are bringing harm to no one by wearing a burqa. Everyone is comfortable in different things, and we would not want anyone telling us we cannot wear a hoodie if we are cold or a hat. This is the same thing as telling Muslim women that they cannot wear a burqa.
The wearing of a hijab or also known as a veil has lately become a problematic issue in numerous locations around the world, in particularly the Western part of the world. Hijab or veil is a headscarf that is regularly worn by Muslim women. Muslim women will wear a veil as a sign of favor to their faith. On the opposite side, others will wear it because they have no other choice from the pressure of their family members and religion. Individuals will even argue that the wearing of a hijab is a spiritual liberation. Other individuals will have a difference in opinion by saying that by wearing a hijab is an unjust to women, they believe that the wearing of a hijab is part of a Muslim system that brings women under command and control.
Within the Middle East, the largest population of the men and women are Muslim. The Muslim religion suggests that the women wear a veil or hijab, which is a headscarf that only exposes a woman’s eyes, accompanied by a burqa which is a full body cloak. The sole purpose of the clothing is to cover a woman’s feminine features from men’s eyes. The Qur’an, an Islamic scripture supports, and slightly obligates the uniform by saying that women are to be conservative, “Let them wear their head covering over their bosoms, and not display their ornaments.” (Qur’an). Muslim women, instead of feeling oppressed, view this as a positive aspect in their lives, influenced by their devotion to Allah. Their acceptance could be influenced by their
Although previous experiments and studies of campaigns suggest that “the prevailing scholarly consensus on campaigns is that they have minimal effects,” the work of campaign professionals undoubtedly help candidates win votes they would otherwise not win (Brady 4). Such work includes research on how to increase turnout among the electorate through the specific implementations of direct voter contact methods such as phone calls, direct mail, and volunteer canvassers as well as maximizing the potential effects of other campaigns tactics such as television advertisement. Such research allows campaigns to identify areas in which limited resources such as capital and time can be allocated to achieve the maximal effect in terms of turnout and