Priests in all ancient religions seek to do one thing: explain the unexplainable and provide guidance for others’ lives. In an ancient society, this role is irreplaceable as they did not know how to explain much of the things they saw in the natural world. Since Judaism was central to a Hebrew king’s legitimacy and to their culture, Jewish priests held higher prestige and status than Buddhist monks. Jewish priests generally had a large influence on who ruled and who didn’t; if the priests didn’t support you, then the people didn’t either. On the opposite hand, Buddhist monks had a higher economic standing with the financial income their monasteries provided.
Buddhists had a high level of economic influences due to their monasteries being able
…show more content…
Due to this fact, Jewish priests were more well-respected and had a higher social class than Buddhist monks. “The Buddha and his first disciples had no fixed place to call home. They slept under trees and begged for all of their food. Their only clothes were robes they patched together from cloth taken from rubbish heaps” (O'Brien). Buddhist monks were not openly revered enough to acquire cloth or have a home, but had enough reverence and following to get food from other’s meals. The Hebrew / Israelite people were arguably more devout and unified in their religion, giving the Jewish priests a higher standing than Buddhists monks. “...Priests played a critical role in socio-political realities, from ritual practice to cultural memory, from sacral authority to religious identity, and from political administration to foreign affairs. Priests, and especially the high priest, figure prominently in the literature of Second Temple Judaism and are critical to the sectarian beliefs on display at Qumran” (Bonfiglio). With the priests’ central, governmental role in Hebrew society, so the Hebrew citizens had no choice but to respect the priests. The reason for the stark contrast in their social treatment is because of one fact: Judaism is, and always had been, more important to the Hebrew culture. Buddhists are, and always have been, a side show to a southern India’s delights. Despite the varying political and economic situations for the two religious groups, their priests were usually view with the same amount of reverence, although the people who worshipped them showed their gratitude in different ways. Buddhist monks received reverence in the forms of “Wealthy laypeople sometimes invited groups of monks to be housed on their estates during the rainy seasons. Eventually a few of these patrons built permanent houses for
Buddhism was a powerful force in politics and in everyday life. It was a tool of the ruling class to appease the people in times of hardship - such as the political disunity in between dynasties. However, when the times changed, Buddhism was also blamed for much of the trouble, and for edging out the much more strict doctrine of Confucianism. Most of the documents presented indicated a spread nonetheless of Buddhism among the people. Additional documents needed to further evaluate the response to Buddhism should be from a source of a slightly lower class, such as a merchant, or a view from a convert to Buddhism - since most views seem to be from Confucian
The religions often were a reprieve from the harsh government, and that story is really displayed with how people would use the Buddhist monasteries as a way to avoid paying taxes to the government. Religion could also offer stability and had benefits for everyone, not just the rich or the poor. Whitfield said, “[The monastery] offered the poor employment, the rich redemption, and a tax haven to both.” (161) However, the people in charge of the religion, no matter the denomination, were all susceptible to corruption. With Kumtugh the Horseman, his tribal leaders adapted the beliefs of Sogdian Merchants, who they offered protection to while traveling through their lands.
Because Buddhism did not originate in China, many people during the Tang dynasty turned against it. Han Yu, a leading Confucian scholar, called Buddhism a religion created by “barbarians” who knew nothing China’s history or culture (Document 4). This perspective is not surprising, as Confucianism was deeply rooted in China’s history unlike Buddhism which has simply spread to China by trade. Later, in 845 C.E., Tang Emperor Wu said that Buddhism would only decrease productivity and put China’s people at a disadvantage (Document 6). This view also made sense because of Confucians’s five relationships. One of these important relationships is an Emperor’s duty to his people. Buddhist monastic lands, by law, could not be taxed or forced to serve the country in labor. According the Emperor Wu, not having all hands on deck would only slow down or possibly reverse the country’s
In classical India, the religion of Buddhism was formed in reaction to the strict ways of Hinduism. Many people, mainly lower class, converted to seek a better life and be enlightened more efficiently. This new religion made its way to China where much of its population converted through trade and missionaries. The conversion of Buddhism in China caused many effects of the spread of Buddhism because of its influential impacts from 300 to 900 CE which are influencing the government, caused some people to reject it, and mainly was a unifying force for China. An effect the spread of Buddhism is the influence of its morals on China’s government in 300-900 CE (Doc’s 1, 7). On some occasions Chinese people vehemently rejected Buddhism and rather practice more Chinese driven religion (Doc’s 5, 7). The most impactful effect of the spread of Buddhism is its ability to unite the Chinese in the way of
went out of their way to follow “its” commands. The buddhists distanced themselves from the
In today’s society we all have fears, for instance many fear things like spiders, heights, or public speaking. Just like in “The Masque of the Red Death” by Edgar Allan Poe, one fear most everyone has is disease. Diseases today such as Hepatitis C, AIDS, cancer, liver disease, tuberculosis and so many more change so many lives every day.
In early India, there were many types of religions, two of which being Hinduism and Buddhism. Both Hinduism and Buddhism were extremely important religions in Early India. They shared some similarities and differences in qualities regarding their origins, sacred texts, and different beliefs. Hinduism believed in reincarnation and karma as it would help them in their coming life and will move them higher on the caste system, opposed to Buddhism which believed more in doing the right thing and not hurting anyone or anything because they believed that all deserve to be treated correctly. Buddhism was not about the caste system like Hinduism, it was more about being a good human being and that karma will return to you. The people that looked more in Buddhism were the people who were the rejects of the caste system.
In the ancient Roman world, religion played the most important role in everyday life, as well as in matters of the state. The Romans looked to the gods for political stability and for control of the unexplainable and natural phenomenon. The gods were believed to control all aspects of Roman life, and for that reason, a great deal of importance was placed in the appropriate worship of the gods. Women played an extremely influential role in ancient Roman religion. Not only did they participate in religious rituals, but some even held religious positions as Vestal Virgins.
When taking the communal path to reach salvation, some people decide to become obedient monks and live in monasteries. Once in a monastery, monks are
Also, Buddhism was a more peaceful and calm religion. Unlike in Buddhism, in Hinduism there was a caste system. It was a group from a social system. Hindus had gone by using a caste system, but it was rejected in the Buddhism community which resulted in many Buddhist being laborers and craftspeople. Hindus and Buddha both had different beliefs. For example, “Hindus saw religion as a way of liberating the soul from illusions, disappointments, and mistakes of everyday existence.” (World History Patterns of Interaction, 2005)
Buddhism, a group of beliefs and practices which make up a prominent religion founded by Siddhartha Guatama, plays an imperative role in the court system. While the court systems tend to rule through aristocracy, an important few citizens rule, in a manner where most people of power are hereditary elite or have been elected by those who rule based on the vital qualities certain people possess. One example of Buddhism playing a large role in the life of aristocracy
The first Indian ruler to become a Buddhist was Ashoka. “Ashoka's patronage, however, was especially important in the history of Buddhism, for he not only sustained the faith at an important point in its development but spread it far beyond his own borders.” Ashoka had commands engraved on pillars, which was a big impact on the spread of Buddhism in communities. “Central Asia became a major center of Buddhism by the first century C.E., and from there the faith spread along the Silk Road and into China and Korea.” Because of Ashoka, religions were passed quickly through the Silk Roads. Gregory, the Wonderworker converted people into Christianity. Christian communities thrived in Mediterranean basin by late third century C.E. Christians also attracted people from southwest Asia and in the Roman Empire. Individuals started isolated themselves and lived like hermits, devoting their time to praise God.
A thing that appealed the people of the Classical Period about this two religions and led to the spread and evangelization of them was the fact that they both promised their followers salvation. As it is stated in the paragraph before their followers state of salvation was achieved when reaching the Nirvana or Heaven. During the Classical Period people were in a state of chaos, the lower class was losing the lands they used for agriculture, middle class’ trade was being affected, and upper class were losing power. These three different social classes needed the hope of salvation, the one that Buddhism and Christianity could give them. Another thing that appealed about these two religions, specially to the lower class was the Universality of it. You were spiritually equal to Buddha or God no matter what, not even social class or race. Also, both of them were against slavery. At last, was how personal it was. You could directly interact with God or Buddha by praying or meditating, which supposedly will help you and direct you throughout your life.
One of the most early religions are Judaism and Buddhism. Both Judaism and Buddhism have lots of differences beliefs and practices and only few similarities. Judaism was started in 2000 B.C.E, led by Abraham. Buddhism was started in 560 B.C.E, by Siddhartha Gautama. Both religions have different point of view. Buddhism don’t believe in deity and Judaism believe in deity. Buddhism are just followers of Gautama and Judaism believe in Yahweh (the God Abraham believed in). It is important to know all this because it tells us when the religions were started and how different they are from one another.
– “The years as they come bring many agreeable things with them; as they go, they take many away” – Horace (65BC – 8BC)