Presidential Debate Essay

Both Roosevelt and Reagan dealt with major events involving foreign affairs. During Reagans two terms he increased defense spending 35 percent, but sought to improve relations with the Soviet Union. He attended meetings with Soviet

The election of Bush v. Gore is known as one of the most controversial elections of all time, people often speculate the perspective of the election based on the popular vote and the way the candidates presented themselves. Known as the “Endless Election”, the events that took place during in the election led to a huge argument on who really won the election. People like to argue that election was rigged and that Gore should have been the POTUS.

On defense, domestic, and international issues, as well as individual rights they were both moderately conservative and agreed or strongly agreed on some topics. A few of these issues for individual rights were that of legally requiring the hiring of women and minorities, that EPA regulations were too restrictive, and that we need to keep God in the public square (“President Ronald Reagan VS President Franklin D. Roosevelt”, n.d.). When it came to domestic issues

We hold debates between the Republican and Democrats before the primaries, and then we hold debates between the two remaining presidential candidates. Upon first glance it may appear that the presidential debates are held to get to know the candidate’s positions on the various issues that are important to the American people; however, the format of the debates make it difficult to accomplish that task. Instead, it is more plausible that these debates are held in order to discover what the candidates are like personally because the debates provide ample opportunities for us to discover the candidate’s values. Ultimately, we want to find out the values that these potential presidents have because we want someone we trust to lead the

Before televised debates, presidential candidates were assessed on their campaign slogans, individual plans to better America, and their moral character. Consequently, the September 26, 1960 Kennedy-Nixon debate forever changed the way Americans would assess their future President of the United States of America. The Kennedy-Nixon Debates

Although Gore’s personality and Clinton Fatigue may have influenced and impacted some voters, their overall effect was not as substantial as Ralph Nader. When Ralph Nader announced he was running for the presidency in the 2000 election, the Democratic Party was infuriated. They firmly believed that if Nader ran alongside Gore, he would detract votes away from Gore consequently allowing Bush to surge ahead. Many of the campaign managers and other members of the Democratic party informed the people that “a vote for Nader would equal a vote for Bush”.# They also advocated that although Nader was slightly more liberal than Gore, against Bush, Gore would have been the better candidate. Later when Nader won the Green Party’s nomination, considering

The federalists wanted the wealthy class to rule and the Democratic republic wanted the people to rule. There are many similarities and differences to this disagreement and yet the democratic republic won the argument and the people of the United States of America rule our country with great pride and pleasure. The differences between the Democratic Republics views and the Federalist views are completely opposite from one another. The federalist believed strongly that the richer people should rule in our country “They did not believe that it was wise to let the public become too involved with politics.”

The US Presidential Election of 2000 featured George W. Bush and Al Gore. It will go down in history as one of the most closest elections¡¦ in US history. It also goes down as one of the most controversial. The final decision was based on just a few hundred votes in Florida. The controversy began when the media prematurely declared the winner twice based solely on exit polls. They finally conceded that the Florida count was just too close to predict. It would take a month before the election was ultimately certified after numerous court challenges and vote recounts. Republican candidate George W. Bush was declared the winner of the Florida¡¦s 25 electoral votes. This was a victory by a razor thin margin of popular

As the first Democrat in nearly 20 years to hold the position, Bill Clinton saw a successful, yet embattled tenure in the office of the presidency. As he looked to pass the torch to his Vice President Albert Gore Jr, a virtually unchallenged bid in the Democratic primary, as he carried all of the delegates, with the stance and platform of being a more moderate alternative to the liberal Senator Bill Bradley of New Jersey. The Republican Party was locked in a more challenged series of primaries with the two frontrunners being Senator John McCain of Arizona, and Governor George W. Bush of Texas. The major third party candidates were consumer advocate of the Green Party Ralph Nader, and his running mate Winona LaDuke, as

Bush and John McCain, but Bush had more recognition because he was popular for his social conservatives. Keeping in mind McCain had won in New Hampshire and Michigan primaries, but Bush won South Carolina and 9 out of the 13 Super Tuesday states. By early march McCain dropped out of the race. On the other hand, Gore had difficultly challenging Senator Bill Bradley over universal health care, gun control, and campaign finance reform, but Gore came out victorious winning all 50 primary states.

While Al Gore does do a nice job of making his point, it would all be somewhat of a waist without established ethos. If he had no ethos, we would not take anything he said into consideration. When Gore introduces himself, he says, “I’m Al Gore and I used to be the next president of the United States.” Some people think that this may hurt him, but it is very untrue. He has to be a highly intelligent and well thought of

Another issue with differing viewpoints was that on the federal deficit. Mr. Dukakis believes that there should be less spending on defense system, which we can afford or need. He also says investment in economic growth will expand the revenue and bring down the deficit and finally he believes his programs will get many people out of welfare and become productive citizens, which would save millions of dollars. Mr. Bush refutes his argument with his so called “flexible freeze.” He believes this program is “going to increase revenues to the federal government, and it's going to create jobs.” He supports his argument by saying that John Kennedy had advocated this program and so had Paul Tsongas, a Senator from Massachusetts, and it does not cost the government any money.

Gore on the other hand agrees with only a couple of things that Bush stated. He strongly supports accountability; he also supports local control. Bush and Gore agree on both. Gore thinks every teacher should be tested including in the subjects that they teach. He also thinks that 100,000 new teachers should be recruited to reduce class size. The main reason for that is because a man gave him a letter from his daughter. The girl is the 36th student in her class; the picture attached showed that there was no room for one desk so she had to stand. He also wants to make college tax deductible (up to $10,000 a year).

One thing that really stood out, in five of the seven articles, are discussions of George Bush's activities were discussed prior to discussion of Al Gore. At first, I thought that maybe it was a fluke and writer was following an alphabetical order procedure to present the article. But, when I read the two articles that discussed Al Gore's activities first it struck me that this is a very important aspect of any writing. This struck me as important because I believe that the position that the writer usually supports is the one that is discussed first and the contrast it with another view. By discussing George Bush first the ideas of Bush are imbedded in the mind and then when discussion of Al Gore is presented it is in the mind to compare it with the previous discussion. This might not necessarily be true but I do feel strongly about this claim. The reason why is, when someone wants to present a unbiased presentation they will compare and contrast the positions of both candidates throughout the whole article and not separate it into two sections.

On September 26, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump encountered each other in the first presidential debate. The debate is now considered as the most-watched debate in the U.S. history with an average audience of 84 million, and held at Hofstra University in New York. Clinton and Trump’s comments were of big controversy as they were bringing each other’s secrets to the light, some of the issues that they tackled were gender, taxes, and national security, inviting the people to vote for one of them this November.