Book: Presidential Campaigns From George Washington to George Bush
Author: Paul F. Boller Jr.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Date: 2004
Pages: 479
The Author Paul F. Boller, Jr. was born on December 31, 1916 in Spring Lake, New Jersey. He received a B.A. degree in 1939 and a Ph.D. in 1947, both from Yale University. He served as a Japanese translator for the U.S. Navy from 1942 through 1946 and then as a civilian analyst for the Office of Naval Intelligence in Washington, D.C. He taught history as a professor at several universities, including Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas (1948-1966), the University of Texas at Austin (1963), Queens College in New York (summer of 1964), the University of Massachusetts at Boston
…show more content…
Much of the book is like this. The author also uses some words to describe people that you can only figure out if you lived in that era of time he was writing about or again if you knew about that time in history. He mention that President Lincoln had dropped McClellan in 1862 for having the “slows” (page 116). In this case “slows “ means that he was slow to attack the enemy and not as aggressive as Lincoln wanted him to be. If you know a little about history then this book would be substantially more enjoyable. Otherwise you might end up looking up names and phrases all day long to figure out what the author is talking about.
I personally enjoyed the book. It was a quick read and kept me entertained and wanting to read more. The author manages to keep the readers attention with just enough humor and a nice brief but informative campaign summary. It's short and sweet. It's funny to read about how little some things have changed and even how some things have gotten worse. These days the candidates have access to more of each others pasts and do not hesitate to expose even the dirtiest of things and use the dirtiest of tactics in order to be president. It will never again be the same as when George Washington became President of the United States. He didn't even want the job, “Washington, who was fifty six, had mixed feelings about the honor,”
Chapter one of The American Political Tradition by Richard Hofstadter is centered on the Founding Fathers. The very beginning of the chapter says that the Constitutional Convention was trying to create a government that would pay debts and avoid currency inflation. The Democratic ideas that the Founding Fathers were so against appealed mostly to less privileged classes, and not at all to the higher classes. This chapter says that the Founding Fathers thought that if no constitutional balance were achieved, one specific class or would take over others. Three advantages of a good constitutional government were listed in this chapter as well. One: keep order against majority rule. Two: a representative government. Three: aristocracy and democracy
Very interesting points you brought up as to why FDR did not want to involve himself in Upton Sinclair's campaign for governor of California. Indeed, even though FDR and Upton Sinclair were both democrats, the difference is that FDR was non-partisan and Sinclar was not. Kasey, why do you believe this is so and was it because FDR was so involved in winning the election in 1932? I also got the same perception from the readings and from your post that it was a political strategy by FDR to not helping or for that matter in supporting Sinclair's campaign. FDR had too much going on with the economy and getting the country out of the devastating financial turmoil in history called "The Great Depression." My perception is that FDR's main focus
Overall this book was very, very good. It teaches good morals in interesting ways, and I definitely recommend it to anyone who would like a good, nonfiction read. There are many memoirs but this one is sure to leave an impression on you. In other news, Paramount took the liberty of purchasing the film rights to The Glass Castle, a movie that should be extremely interesting in the coming years. I hope they do a good
I liked how he draws attention to the small things because that’s what really matters. Mr. McCullough also uses lots of primary and secondary sources and mainly used deductive reasoning. He highlights the military within the special focus on the battle of George Chester Heights, Long Island, and Trenton. I would say overall that the good points weigh out the bad when it comes to how well each topic was described. This is not the typical book I would normally read. It wasn’t what I am truly into. This book was a true success when it came down to what all happened in 1776. He told the story of 1776 in an amazing way describing and all of the
"The Martin Van Buren Administration." Presidential Administration Profiles for Students, edited by Kelle S. Sisung and Gerda-Ann Raffaelle, Gale, 2002. Research in Context, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=MSIC&sw=w&u=avlr&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CBT2304200039&it=r&asid=dd16c6eb024e7b33de8c96ac86e84450. Accessed 14 Nov.
The 1964 American election between Lyndon B. Johnson and Barry Goldwater has strong similarities with the 2016 election between Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump. In both cases, the democrat candidates focused more on their counterpart’s rhetoric rather than uphold their own ideas in an attempt to persuade voters to support them. This essay will argue that the Democrat candidates of the 1964 and 2016 elections, in many instances, instead of focusing on their political proposals, focused on anti-intellectualism by emphasizing their opponent’s extremist right-winger rhetoric. This comparison shows the enduring trends of right-wing extremism, racial conflicts, and republican divisiveness. To prove this argument, this text will analyze Democrat campaign advertisements in both campaigns, Nelson A Rockefeller speech at the 1964 National Republican convention and Jeb Bush interview to NBC.
The story was very intriguing, and had many quotes that made it feel like a fiction novel. You could almost feel everything the main characters felt, as it gave motivation and thought. For example, the friendship between Roosevelt and Taft was very strong at the beginning, but fell apart due to the competition they were in. There was lots of foreshadowing and irony, such as a quote from Woodrow Wilson on page 243, “It would be and irony of fate if my administration had to deal chiefly with foreign affairs, for all my preparation has been in domestic matters.” As we soon learn, he was president during the Great War, and dealt with many other foreign affairs along the way. There were also many motivational parts that brought the reader in as if they were part of the book, and with several different people included you could relate to their side of certain issues or be offended by their early 20th century “ethics”. My favorite parts were Debs and Roosevelt, because they were very personable and energetic people, and even though they were progressive radicals, they are very similar to a moderate today. Another good part about this book was because it is about a time in politics over 100 years ago, it seems as if there aren’t nearly as many important issues to discuss as there is today, making it easier to understand. Despite all of the great things about this book, there were also some bad things. First of all, there were some typos. This didn’t make it impossible to understand, but it had many more than an average book. There were also a lot of prodigious words, which would be okay if they were used in moderation and not unnecessary. Especially towards the end when everyone is dying, it would be nice if there were short descriptions next to medical terms so you wouldn’t have to look them up and be disgusted with pictures of abscesses. Along
Richard Hofstadter examines the political beliefs of the founding fathers in the first chapter of the American Political Tradition. Ideas thought about by most Americans to be the center of our organization, our founders viewed liberty, democracy, and property, as evil. The composition can be depicted to be vicious as well, because liberty, democracy, and property are linked to the United States Constitution.
Hyosang You GOVT-2306-71001 Professor. Sharifian Assignment Two: 1 The Campaign Before running for the office in Texas. First, we need to decide which party to run for between the House of the Representative or Senate. According to the chart that was provided for the candidates spend in 2016, the average cost for the Senate is about a dollar per vote. Whereas the average cost for the House of the Representative start around three dollars per vote and the price goes up significantly. Which concludes that running as House of the Representative costs more than the Senate in Texas.
It is hard to believe that it will be a year since the Bush vs. Gore campaign was in it’s
Muskie had a good chance of winning and felt he had to do something to get
The election of 1972 was one of the largest landslide victories by a presidential candidate in United States history. President Nixon was reelected to the presidency by beating Senator George McGovern of South Dakota in an impressive victory. The Nixon landslide victory tied FDR’s 60.8 percent of the popular vote in 1936 for the second largest popular vote get in American history. Nixon’s 60.8 percent of the vote compared to McGovern’s 37.6 percent, a difference of 23.2 percent, was also the fourth largest margin of victory in a presidential election in United States History. Nixon not only won with an impressive popular vote margin, but he also won 49 of the 50 states’ electoral votes amounting to
In his biography of America's founding father and first president, George Washington: The Patriot President, author William M. Thayer describes the heroic acts of leadership that Washington displayed while fighting in the American Revolution and during his two terms as President. Using a personal style that appeals to young readers, Thayer provides many glimpses into the private life of George Washington that give a better impression of the man behind one of history's most legendary figures. By tracing the path of Washington's incredible life, from his childhood farm on Mount Vernon to his participation in the French and Indian War of 1754, the author successfully recreates the key events in Washington's development. The book is filled with tales of Washington's bravery on the battlefield, his natural ability to lead men during both war and peace, and his fierce sense of patriotism in the face of British aggression. After reading George Washington: The Patriot President the lesson that greatness is earned through hard work and determination is made clear.
Overall, the novel was a good read, but at times was uncomfortable. For someone who is not a lover of vampire books or movies, the novel was very interesting. However, it did raise some questions about race in America, the meaning of family, and
Political campaigns are very significant in American politics and elections. It is the period before the electorate makes political decisions in the form of elections. The attention of the citizens towards politics intensifies as the date of the elections draws near. The salience of voters improves as the election date draws near and could manifest in the form of increased media attention. Political discussions, campaign interest, strength of the intention to vote, and knowledge about the candidates are other manifestations of increased salience of voters. Another indication of improved intensity is the effort put by the candidates and their political parties in the campaigns. Parties increase their efforts in the