Political Government: Representative Democracy Vs United States

Direct democracy is a government in which the people decide. Direct democracy overall is a positive thing, but as with everything, there can be some dangers. Direct democracy is a form of democracy in which the people are able to vote and form consensus on policies directly. The people have the power of recall, which gives the public the power to remove elected officials from office before the end of their term if they do not feel they are doing a great job. California voters are also able to help make laws by creating ballot propositions.

Over the course of the Revolutionary War, the people of the colonies fought for freedom, liberty, and a fair government. They were pursuing a better society, and wanted a non-tyrannical administration. They needed their government to reflect this. The Constitution addressed and embodied the ideals and opinions of the people during the Revolutionary Era, which included a need for a representative democracy, checks and balances on the government, and a protection for the citizen’s rights.

For the past two centuries, America’s constitution has been the centerpiece of our politics, academia, and philosophy. Yet, the pillar (America’s constitution) that has maintained our nation for over 200 years has fallen short of ensuring the main differentiating aspect of our country for which we jubilate: representative democracy.

Government is an administration defined by the Constitution, but is also a constantly adjusting foundation by the efforts of its citizens. By Litherland (2014), government is defined as policies set in order to lead a body of people (p. 395). Over the span of time, the idea of government has been stretched, changed, and applied to various communities throughout both the nation and the world. Whether it was back in the eighteenth century, current, or in the very near future—government has existed and will continue to exist for its people and the nation it has built its foundation upon. With the use of multiple authors, those of: “Difference between Direct and Representative Democracy” (n.d.), “Federalism - Dividing Power between States and the

I also believe that representative democracy will be the best choice because of the large population of people living in the United State. It will be impossible for every citizen to vote on all issues and law consider by local, state, and federal government. What if a citizen considers that an issues that is on the ballet is not important to him or her, will she or he take the time to educate themselves on the issue to make the right choice or will they guess or will they not bother in voting because is to complex? In my opinion that is why a representative of the people is best to serve on behalf of the citizen.

A direct democracy or pure democracy is a form of government wherein the citizens have a direct say.

The Webster definition for democracy is a system of rule by laws, not by individuals. In a democracy, the rule of law protects the rights of citizens, maintain orders and limits the power of the government. All citizens are equal under the law. No one may be discriminated against based on age, beliefs, race, religion, ethic group or gender. In the United States of America, our country is known for its democracy. The people hold the power to rule and make all the decisions both direct and representative. An example of direct democracy is when we can vote on certain concerns and vote on who we would like to represent for us. A direct democracy is when the people can decide on policy initiatives. Representative democracy is when we have a representative

What is democracy? Democracy is a form of government that vest the power onto the people (Barbour & Wright, 2016). When a state actor’s form of government is democracy, the citizens vote for their leaders and on laws to be passed. Democracy is part of the non-authoritarian system which means the individual citizens decide how to live their lives and the government’s role is very limited (Barbour & Wright, 2016). There are many state actors that run their countries in a democracy way including, United States, Sweden, Japan, and India. Although the United States Democracy is not exactly a true democracy.

America was founded on the basic principle of democracy…right? Isn’t that the freedom we were searching for when the voyagers left Europe to form the US in the first place? The irony in this is that we are often taught to believe that the United States uses a true democracy. Over the years the United States has contradicted many of their basic ideologies and principles that we were founded on. For the most part, our Constitution has remained basically intact, other than minor exceptions here and there. However, our founding documents are extremely open ended and leave much room to change and interpret throughout time. Due to the flexibility of the United States founding documents the country practices a representative democracy rather

The first excerpt is 1 and it has two principles. the principles are 2,4 principle 2 all people have basic rights that cannot be taken away. It becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands. Principle 4 when the government doesn’t protect the rights of the people, the people have the right to change/alter or abolish the government. When people break away from the country going to a new nation, they should explain why they are doing. that’s the first

There are many ways states are governed and many different systems of governments. The United States of America uses a democratic system of government; a system where the common person holds power through the ability to vote and participate in politics. Although this holds true for a majority of the operations carried out within the state, some may say the United States has shares particular characteristics of a dictatorship; a system of government where politics are controlled by a small subset of individuals, rather than the power being held by the people in a democratic system.

The United States was a country built on values of fair representation and freedom. Americans disagreed with the monarchy of British reign, and thus declared the United States to be a democratic - a government in which the masses elect the leaders and thereby act in the interests of the people. Regulations were established to reinforce these ideals, including three different branches of government and a term limit for the president in order to prevent a monopoly. Yet there are major flaws in the country that hide behind the ruse of democracy. This form of government is a source of pride for the United States, but that pride blinds people from the blatant issues that plague the country. The underlying corruption and oppression in the United

The United States has an unstable democratic standing. What has happened in the United State shows the US not fully democratic. Issues that the US had been unfair treatment of people who aren’t white, voting rights not being given, and relocation towards a certain race, which has done nothing wrong. People also faced issues that couldn’t be avoided with rights. The United States is not democratic as everyone thinks. Equality and voting rights are something for all and within our amendment. Imprisonment or relocation of a race that has done nothing wrong. Americans also were faced the government for something that many didn’t wish for. The US has to change to be a better place for all.

Bernard Manin in his book “The Principles of Representative Government” is defining the key features of modern democratic institutions. He talks about 4 observed principles of representative government in which two I feel resonate more to me are the important are “those who govern are appointed by election at regular intervals” and “those who are governed may give expression to their opinion and political wishes without being subject to control of those who govern” (p.6) The reason representative democracy is so great is because the people elect representatives at certain intervals as well as the people can critique the state of government as they are the ones who government is supposed to benefit. I also like how he says that “decision making of those who govern retain a degree of independence from the wishes of the electorate,” as politicians should have discretion on small matters as they should serve as they feel people would want them to but the issue is that power tend to corrupt people and they could drift away from the electorate. I see this as people understanding politicians will not always do everything we want but we have a mutual agreement that everything is for our best interest.

Take it all the way back to when the constitution was being written. The founding fathers had a big choice to make; did they establish a direct democracy or a representative democracy? They had to weigh the pros and cons of each and they ended up deciding on a representative democracy. In this paper I will tell you why they made things the way they did and certain compromises they made along the way.