• Plot the estimated actual fracture gradient curve and the designed fracture gradient curve, which is the estimated actual fracture gradient, less allowance for well control, surge, or ECD. • Plot offset mud weight and LOT (or Formation Integrity Test) data to provide a check of the pore pressure predictions. • Start from the bottom on the mud weight curve (Point A); draw vertical line up to the designed fracture gradient curve (Point B). Point B is the initial estimated intermediate casing setting depth. The interval between Point A and Point B is the initial estimated production casing or liner interval. • Move cross to Point C from Point B at the same depth to identify the mud weight required for the depth. • Move up to Point D (must stay under the designed fracture gradient curve) to determine the surface (or intermediate casing in some offshore areas term) casing setting depth. • Move cross to Point E from Point D at the same depth to identify the mud weight required for that depth. In the case shown in the figure, there would be no requirement for casing above this depth. However, a conductor casing (or surface casing in some offshore areas term) is required to prevent wash out of shallow formation and to provide support for subsequent wellhead and to enable diverters to be installed. Certain factors apart from the pore pressure and fracture gradient are also involved in the casing depth selection process and they are: • Underground supply drinking water zones •
2. Using the protractor, measure the angle of the ramp making sure the angle of the ramp is 10˚.
To calculate the effective diameter of the particles, we use Equation 1 provided below. To determine the effective diameter of the particles, we needed to have the hydrometer readings and temperature for each time taken, as well as using the Coefficient of temperature adjustment table provided in Appendix 3 and the Hydrometer 152H length readings in Appendix 4. To able to determine the Percent Finer for Hydrometer, we use Equation 2 provided below as well as Equation 3 for the Dry Weight of Soil provided below. For Equation 2, we also need the Specific Gravity correction for percent finer table to be able to solve Equation 2. The Specific Gravity correction for percent finer table is provided in Appendix 5. Furthermore, to determine the total
“D” is the depth in feet. The value for D is the depth of the top perforation as described in the well construction diagram in APPENDIX A.
By identifying the sediment size at each station allows the amount of long shore drift happening at each stage of the beach to be assessed and evaluated. If the size of the rocks decrease in size closer to the harbour arm, it will help prove my hypothesis
Measure the side length of each block along the grain. When taking a measurement, position the block so the caliper measuring surfaces are touching the end grain faces. Record the measurements to create a data set. Accuracy =.001 in
CHM130 Lab 6 Exploring Density Name A. Data Tables Place your completed Data Tables here Part IIIa (3 points) Volume of water in graduated cylinder (mL)10 mlMass of rubber stopper (g)11.15Volume of water and rubber stopper (mL)16.5 Part IIIb (6 points) Volume of water in graduated cylinder (mL)20Mass of iron nail (g)3.66Volume of water and iron nail (mL)20.5 Part IV (20 points) Type of Aluminum FoilMass (g)Length (cm)Width (cm)Volume (cm3)Thickness (cm)Regular.63g15 cm 10.02 cm.21 cm3.0014 cm Heavy Duty.97g15 cm10.01 cm .36 cm3.0024 cm B. Follow Up Questions Show all work for questions involving calculations. Part I Use the concepts/vocabulary of density to explain why the liquids formed layers in Part I of the procedure. (8 pts)
13. Refer to the photograph in Figure 1.14B (p. 8 lab book), which shows a mineral that has several smooth, flat cleavage surfaces, to complete the following.
In site one there was a high proportion of very unspherical rocks. According to this the hypothesis is right, in site two there is a lot more smother rocks medium sized and in site 3 there are very small pebbles which are very smooth and spherical. The pebbles get smoother and rounder while it goes downstream. Due to us only taking about 10 rocks our result may have been not right as there were some pebbles which were largely over sized. Most of the other load is dissolved by solution such as limestone and chalk
The below shown highlighted screenshot is the comparison relaxation formula used to check at each edge.
To determine whether the height at which a marble is dropped affect the size of the crater.
Distance of the nearest point of the improvements to the buffer edge and to the 12-ft. primary structure setback.
Recently, oil companies have increased their search for oil in water deeper than 1,500 feet, which is classified as "deep water." While that is where the companies hope to find the largest untapped oil reserves, seeking out and extracting oil there presents unique challenges. For one thing, platforms in deep water cannot sit on legs connected to the sea floor the way they can in shallower areas, so other methods must be used to protect them from strong currents.
Case II: The beam was turned around in such way that the shortest side of the cross section is on the support. The steps described in Case I was repeated and data was recorded.
The objective of this experiment is to obtain the grading curve for both fine and coarse aggregate.
Depth of water: The amount of water will be changed by 1 cm for every data point. (There are 9) This will be measured in height in order to get the most accurate