Plagiarism In The Professional World

When it comes to artist’s muses there is a fine line between inspiration and plagiarism. If one tries to define the areas where art starts plagiarizing a body of work, they will most likely end up fighting in circles. It is difficult to constitute where plagiarizing begins and inspiration ends. Artists have been including copyrighted or trademarked work into their own pieces and then calling it their own for decades, possibly even longer. Nowadays artists from all ends of the world are basing their work around preexisting pieces or are using the likenesses surrounding them. This doesn’t rest in the art world either. Just recently in the news, there was a report that a successful lawsuit was brought against Robin Thicke for his hit song “Blurred Lines.” Marvin Gaye’s estate brought a lawsuit against Thicke for ripping off Gaye’s 1977 hit “Got to Give It Up.” The ruling was in favor of Gaye, resulting in Thicke owing $7.3 million to Gaye’s family in damages (Grow, Kory). This case and other cases have light shed on them from the media and then public debates ensue about which party is in the right. Society has an array of opinions when it comes to copyright, fair use, and appropriation. Many people do not understand the specifics about copyright laws nor do they comprehend how one can truly break these laws fully. More often than not, people are familiar with at least the phrases copyright, appropriation and fair use. But the legitimate points are fairly skewed by the public.

As one begins to grasp the concept of Schroth’s (2012) article The Plagiarism Plague, it is easy to identify the author’s dissatisfaction for plagiarism and the negative connotations he has for someone who is involved in this heinous offense. He initiates and summarizes his commentary with personal stories of how plagiarism has affected him. Schroth offers several solutions for the copyright issue that is upon us; he states, “the sanction for plagiarism must be at least an F on the paper, accompanied by a letter in the student's file to be consulted if it happens again, with the understanding that a second offense would mean expulsion.” Schroth was also sure to mention the collective approach necessary from all educators for his solution to be implemented. He believes the “policy will be effective only with leadership from the president and full cooperation from the faculty.” The writer goes on to explain how plagiarism has become an epidemic in this society and the effects of its prevalence thereof. Although plagiarism has become rampant in this society, it is still immoral and unethical. College students continue to plagiarize however, because they refuse to regard their education as a top priority and it has become culturally acceptable for people to falsify information without any serious penalties for their dishonesty.

Plagiarizing politicians is not new news for vigilant voters. Politicians and renowned leaders, new and old, like Joe Biden, Sen. John Walsh, Rand Paul, Barack Obama, and even Vladimir Putin have all been condemned for accused plagiarism – thankfully, not all their responses were as level-headed as Joe Biden’s when he said, “I do not understand what the big deal is” (Osnos, Evan). But what does that say about the United States’ own elected leaders? What does that say about the people who elected these plagiarizing and shameless leaders? These political leaders should be held accountable to the consequences of their actions, just like anybody else, as they should be even less likely to plagiarize than the common college

From a societal perspective, plagiarism is seen as an anticipated but unfortunate matter of fact, somewhat like a social faux pas (Martin, 1994). If someone in a high level position were to be revealed for plagiarism, certainly there would be embarrassment and some stigma associated with such knowledge (Green, 2002) but when considered against all possible offenses, likely downplayed as minor. Sadly, these incidents are happening younger and younger (Lahey,

Plagiarism extends beyond just the academic realm. There have been many instances, in professional fields, of integrity violations in written works. One example of this is Jayson Blair, formerly of the New York Times. After his news agency found that he had plagiarized an article. The article, which was written about a Soldier who was killed in combat, and his family, was found to be plagiarized from the San Antonio Express. (Belt, 2004). This was not the only story that Blair copied, embellished, or synthesized. There were, in fact, dozens of questionable articles written by Blair during his tenure with the news agency. Because his supervisors were not communicating effectively, and no major complaints were registered, Blair was able

Arizona State University (ASU) is dealing with a case of plagiarism, Presenting someone else’s words or ideas without acknowledging where those words and ideas were located, (Ann Raimes, 2013, pg 153) against one of its professors. This is the third time the professor has been accused of using others ideas as his own without citing his source. Should this professor have a job? Let’s take a look at the three accounts and decide if they were a misunderstanding or just plain plagiarism.

As a student at Robert Kennedy College, and therefore as part of an academic community where high standards of morality are paramount, you are expected to behave honourably. Plagiarism, which is cheating under another name, wastes the time of faculty members, leads to the ignominy of being accused of unfair practice, and – above all – diminishes you as a human being.

Yes, I have seen “institutional Plagiarism” throughout my career in the workplace. Our management team has to write quarterly reports. We have used the same form and filled in the blank for many years. We saved much time to discuss over the reports rather quickly and accurately during the conferences. Because of using the same form over and over again, we only need to glance through the report to understand what would be the priority to be addressed.

times. According to Moss (2005, para. 1), “Plagiarism - the attempt to pass off the ideas, research, theories or words of others as one's own - is a serious academic offence.” With the definition Moss gave, it can be inferred that plagiarism is not only committed in arts and literature but also in the field of science and politics. Even the educated class of the society can or may plagiarize. Writing a paper makes one inclined to commit plagiarism but with the proper knowledge of plagiarism, its types, and ways to avoid, one can evade its consequences. Imagine working hard to the point of sacrificing sleep then one day someone decided to copy the hard worked paper

Laws differ from one country to another. Every country has its own rules and regulations either in businesses or education, so depending on those policies; citizens develop different ways of thinking. There are hundreds of papers written everyday. Teaching styles and methods are different from a nation to another to suit the need of its citizens. Cheating and copying from other students or from an article without citing is a definition for the word plagiarism. Plagiarism can help authenticate writers’ work. Most universities in Saudi Arabia and the U.S. deal with this problem similarly, but how schools and students inform to these rules can be quite different. Penalties and rules are the two main different topics that have conflicts.

Plagiarism is taking someone’s work and claim it as your own original work, which is illegal. Although preventing plagiarism is possible, it is still not as easy as anyone thinks it is. Because someone might copy one’s ideas and work, but put them in a different set of synonymic words, then says it is his work and takes all of the credibility of which the owner had put the effort in creating it. On the other hand, citations are completely fine to use. Citation is the act of referring a certain owner of work in your own work. And giving him the credibility which they deserves. And the citation style is how you order the information in a certain citation. And there are several citation styles such as: APA which stands for (American psychological

Plagiarism is a growing and ongoing issue, not just in the United States, but throughout the entire world as well. However, many students inof higher education do not see it as such a big problem and most of the time do not realize they are plagiarizing. Plagiarism, in most universities can lead to serious consequences including expulsion from the institution. In the popular article, “The Plagiarism Plague,” Raymond Schroth discusses a case where he caught a student, who was one of the better ones, plagiarizing. He also discusses the China syndrome which is when foreign Chinese students are sent to attend universities in the United States and have Chinese agencies write their admissions essay and put together their applications. In addition these agencies falsify letterheads and create

In this paper, every opinion from somebody who is not me has been acknowledged placed in a parenthetical citation placed the end of the report. I’m aware the mere existence of a parenthetical citation does not avoid plagiarism, how I don’t know. If I have used the exact words, Similar to this statement. I write this now, phrases, clauses, or sentences of someone else, I have enclosed the information in quotation marks. If I have summarized the opinions of someone else, which I have, I have not enclosed the summary in quotation marks, however I have stated those opinions in my own words. I have also introduced the summary and used a parenthetical citation to acknowledge the source, possibly.

Plagiarism is the process of taking some one else work or ideas and showing it as their own works (Oxford Dictionaries). The purpose of this study is to understand 6 different ethical reasons used by student to overcome with plagiarism and with help of these ethical reason, faculties can bring a solution to stop or prevent plagiarism. Where as unethical behavior can also lead to worries in school or colleges, so there is need to correct it so that it has positive impact on organizational ethics. Although, after reading this journal article, it was clearly seen that mostly used ethical reasons are Deontology, Situational Ethics and Machiavellianism to overcome with the problem of Plagiarism (Ashworth and Bannister, 1997).

In any case, the disgrace of counterfeiting applies in just a few circumstances, for example, an understudy doing a task. In different circumstances - for instance a big name composing a book composed by a professional writer - the word unoriginality is not ordinarily used to depict conduct that fits the definition. This is the thing that I call organised copyright infringement (Martin 1994), in which an effective individual assumes praise for the work of subordinates. Different cases are legislators giving discourses composed by speech specialists (Schlesinger 2008), administration authorities discharging reports composed by subordinates, and administrators co-writing papers when the exploration understudy did most or the majority of the work (Martin 1986; Witton 1973). Systematised copyright infringement ordinarily escapes abuse by being imperceptible or by reframing, as portrayed beneath. What is normally considered as counterfeiting I term focused unoriginality.