Piper Alpha Disaster

The Ocean Ranger was an offshore exploration oil drilling platform that sank in Canadian waters 315 kilometres southeast from St. John's Newfoundland, on the Grand Banks of Newfoundland on February 15, 1982, with 84 crewmembers onboard. The Ocean Ranger was the largest semi-submersible, offshore exploration, oil drilling platform of the day. Built in 1976 by Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, it operated off the coasts of Alaska, New Jersey, Ireland, and in November 1980 moved to the Grand Banks. Since it was so big it was considered to have the ability to drill in areas too dangerous for other rigs. The government thought it was unsinkable, so they felt that there was no need to train a crew very well.

Emergency warnings and alerts should be send to the audiences via email alerts or by posting in status about the potential risks about carrying of the flammable oil across the rail line. The alert notifications should include the protective measures that are to taken if the explosion of the tanks in the rail occurs and the steps to be taken in the emergency situation. Which Includes, how to get the fire in control by using the carbon dioxide tanks

Prior to the disaster, the company had been facing a financial crisis for many years because the sale of pesticides had been fallen (Joseph, Kaszniak and Long 2005, p. 544). Due to the budget cuts, many plant operators received insufficient training on operations and safety awareness (Mannan 2012, p. 2649). As shown in Figure 1, there was a decrease in the length of training programmes for plant operators from 18 months in 1975 to only one month in December 1984 (Chouhan 2005, p. 207). Therefore, with a lack of the knowledge of runaway reactions occurring in the storage tank when the accident happened, many workers could not immediately take any emergency action to lessen the risk of the MIC escape from the storage tank (Chouhan 2005, p. 207). To connect the tank with another

The risk, which the proposed project exposes the marine ecosystems and fresh water rivers to, will be very high. However, the report in the volume seven has presented a comprehensive risk assessment and mitigation procedure. Despite having recorded some oil spills history, it has made a significant contribution in minimizing oil spills. I will be therefore, unjust for the critics of this

What makes this pump such an incredible gadget is, to the point that it has a fantastic limit with respect to sucking in power as it doesn't rely on upon outer gaseous tension. A submersible pump has an arrangement of mechanical seals that are utilized to keep water from leaking through the engine that may prompt to an electrical short out.

Notwithstanding the necessities of Subpart F, "Fire Protection and Prevention" (29 CFR 1926), open blazes and fires are disallowed in all underground development exercises, with the exception of hot work operations. Smoking is permitted just in zones free of flame and blast dangers, and the business is required to post signs precluding smoking and open blazes where these perils exist. Different work practices are additionally distinguished as preventive measures. For instance, there are restrictions on the funneling of diesel fuel from the surface to an underground area. Additionally, the channel or hose framework used to exchange fuel from the surface to the capacity tank must stay unfilled with the exception of when exchanging the fuel. Fuel

* The Engineers however, had already disabled the first failsafe be removing the control rods.

Ensure the primary pump is plugged in, especially prior to conditions that may result in flooding.

In the year 1977, a blowout occurred on “Bravo” production platform of Ekofisk during maintenance. The blowout occurred due to a misplaced blowout preventer. This cause approximately 202380 barrels

Honeywell utilizes state-of-the-art technology to help guarantee the flow of data and its delivery in order to prevent errors, which takes us to the second part of TotalPlant, which reduced defects monumentally: fail safing. Fail safing identifies defects, analyzes the root cause of these errors in business processes, and creates possible solutions. These root causes of errors can be tested to check for validity by asking three simple questions: “ is it a cause of the defect identified, is it possible to change the cause, and if eliminated, will the defect be eliminated or at least reduced” (Paper, Pendharkar, Rodger, n.d.)? After the root cause(s) have been identified, solutions must be generated and then one solution must be chosen based on greatest value; after a solution is chosen, a plan must be created to implement the solution. The solution must be checked for success in eliminating the defect through analysis via the action register, pareto charts, and histograms. Finally, the results have to be acted upon, meaning employees must determine steps for continuing this improvement and further improving it more by constantly repeating the fail safing process.

In our case, Microsoft developed a new operating system “Windows Vista” as the solution for the problems of Windows XP rather than developing patches and upgraded versions to provide solution. This has resulted in failure to recognize the actual problem which should occur during the problematization.

As soon as the problem occurs the warning system is activated by the warning signals. Each warning corresponds to a LED in "LED WARNING PANEL". The controller priorities the warning, and based on priority particular message is heard using Speech synthesizer [aPR33A3] in the headset of the pilot. Simultaneously the LED and the buzzer are drived. The system uses the "ACK" switch through which pilots can acknowledge the

Above all are Issues in the current system. Now we going to discuss about the problems of those issues. There are lot of problems are related with this current

The discussion hereafter will concern a hypothetical scenario in which a tanker is leading corrosive material into an unstable environment. It is incumbent upon us to navigate this scenario in order to bring stability to the emergency response task at hand. First, with respect to the release of a hazardous substance, we must not that "conventional management systems frequently do not adequately address the unique behavior of materials that may react to cause excessive temperature or pressure changes or toxic or corrosive byproducts. EPA and other public and private organizations developed processes to help address these reactive chemical hazards." (EPA, p. 1)

Effective control systems use mechanisms to monitor activities and take corrective action, if necessary. The supervisor observes what happens and