preview

Pessimism In Leyii Leopardi

Decent Essays

Giacomo Leopardi (1798- 1837) was born in Recanati - a small lost town in the Marches which was part of the Papal States back in time-, Italy.
His father guided him to become a classical scholar, in order to push him in that wayn he provided him Leopardi with the best education that could exist; including personal tutors and the accessibility of his father's considerable library that led him to master Greek, classic Latin, Hebrew, and many modern European languages.

Leopardi 's poetry is quite difficult to taste due to the fact that he used to practice archaic. Despite its severe form, the prose is more affordable even if it is often overly concise or oratory. However, the prose is always difficult to translate, particularly the Leopardi’s …show more content…

His sensitivity talks rather than his intelligence. He has not built any system back in time; he summarizes his impressions, observations, keeping in mind to not generalize them. His philosophy is all physiological: the world is bad, because his own life is bad.
He made a terrible representation of the world, and assumes that if men do not agree on that fact, it simply means that they are crazy. “Optimism is in fact quite common; while there is life there is hope.”

As an example of his pessimism, the poem “Night Song of a Wandering Shepherd in Asia” (1831) talks about a shepherd that speaks to the moon once it rises, he keeps comparing between the moon’s wanderings and his personal wanderings. We can notice in this poem a parallel structure and real-world experience develops.
The fact that the shepherd keeps asking so many questions to the moon, while the moon stays silent, makes him overthinks and answers himself. Answering his own question makes him feel even lonelier that he is already.
The shepherd thinks that the moon has experience and knowledge as the Lord has. However, the shepherd keeps hope when the moon stays silent during all the time. His questions definitely show that he ignores the fact that life has a …show more content…

Nature is simply powerless to fulfill the Icelander’s demands concerning the meaning of human misery at the Nature hands, except using brutal realism:
“You forget that the life of the world is a perpetual cycle of production and destruction, so combined that one works for the good of the other. By their joint operation the universe is preserved. If either ceased, the world would dissolve.”
Since man is incapable to accept worthlessness, he will keep asking questions. At the end of the story, the Icelander is disturbed by a starving lion that ate him. And that is how the Nature answers all the Icelander’s questions: “the death of the individual”. Meaning, this tale symbolizes the failure of philosophy and science, showing that the discovered truths are unsatisfactory.
The Icelander is upset by the troublesomeness Nature continually causes and he was hoping for an explanation that he never

Get Access