Persuasive Speech Outline

The debate over compulsory vs. non-compulsory voting is a complex subject matter to say the least, that has sparked much controversy in recent times with almost all strongly in favor of one side of the argument and or the other. This highly polarized debate has sparked in popularity in recent times because of a quote by former president Barak Obama in which he said that “It would be transformative if everybody voted”. It is believed that if everyone voted that could and was eligible then the domination of hard core partisans within the political system would be in part quelled as the candidates went where the votes are, which would be away from the extremes. Moreover some studies show that mandatory voting decreases the rates of uninformed voters within an area as voting becomes more of a civic duty than right. While the institution of compulsory voting would have a short term effect of increasing the rate of uninformed voters,

Voting plays an important role in the modern lives that can easily shape the whole world. While some people believe that voting should be voluntary, I believe that voting should be mandatory for more social benefits. This essay will discuss the reasons why voting should be compulsory.

The Canadian government should adopt a compulsory voting system in order to increase voter turnout, for it assures optimal representation of all Canadians and restores power to each individual.

In “Race and Beyond: Why Young, Minority, and Low-Income Citizens Don’t Vote,” Sam Fulwood claims, “Regardless of whether a favored candidate won or popular ballot initiative passed, our nation suffered because of the number of people who didn’t vote at all” (par. 2). I agree with Sam Fulwood and I believe it is so unfortunate that Americans don’t use this right. Voting is one of the most valuable possessions that Americans are given and yet they do not use. Many of the countries around the world do not grant voting rights to their citizens. These countries either have a dictatorship or kingdom which prevents citizens from voting. People need to understand the sufferings of those people who struggled for this right. When the United States

According to one common view, the quality of democracy depends upon the extent to which voters use their rights to vote and to take part in public life. It is healthy if memberships of political parties are large and active, and if attendance at political rallies is high, and so on. Some nations believe that it is essential to take part in political life, and that the state should encourage, and even oblige them to do so. For example, some countries consider that it is vital to ensure that a high proportion of eligible voters cast their ballots. Accordingly, they make voting compulsory, as in Australia. An alternative view suggests that it does not matter whether citizens actually participate in politics, but it is vital that they should have the right to do so, irrespective of whether they choose to use it. This is perhaps the case in the United States, where voter turnout hovers around an astounding fifty percent, which is lowest among all industrialized democracies (Roskin 113.)

In this essay, I would like to discuss the major obstacles to voting, recent changes to overcome voting barriers and the political influence of changed rules. Low turnout in the U.S. reflects that there are obstacles for people to voting and changes to overcome these obstacles may also bring new problems to different social groups. I will elaborate on these aspects in the following parts.

There are six types of voter participation but voting is by far the most common form of political participation. People participate in elections because of their strong sense of civil duty they have but many people tend not to because political parties aren’t as forceful in getting it’s members to vote than in other places. People that vote are usually educated, older, and have a higher income, Throughout the history of the United States o America, many of the citizens have been suppressed in regarding their right to vote. Even though most of the citizens, that are old enough, are eligible to vote there is still low voter turn out. Low voter turnout is most commonly explained by apathy among citizens and problems with registration. Campaigns become more personalistic when they are for primary elections, there is a reliance on the candidate’s image, and there is decline in party identification. There is a lot of strategy involved in political campaigns. The overall strategy should be to appeal to voters in a party for that party’s nomination even if it means becoming more radical so that way you can attract the main group of that party. Once the nomination is secured it is better to have more centrist views to convince those of the opposite party whose votes are wavering, to vote for the candidate. The main reasons that

There are countless citizens who prefer not to vote and for various distinctive intentions. The voter turnout in the 2012 midterms, remained the lowest in any voting rotation since World War II, with merely 36.4% of the voting qualified populace placing votes. Certain of the distinctive causes for not voting include individuals believing their ballot would not count, the voting lines are tremendously extensive, registering necessities becomes perplexed, voters can be unconcerned, individuals do not like the candidates that are running for office, or simply

Second, there is a practical reason why citizens should vote. In 2016, the United States federal budget was approximately four trillion dollars and the voting eligible population in 2016 was around 250 million. What it does mean is estimated the value of one vote is regarded as 16 thousand dollars. In other words, missing the chance of vote is same as missing the chance of deciding the use of sixteen thousand dollars per

The multiple characteristics that play into political participation of a person can span from gender, race, economic situation, amount of education, and their political affiliation. One case is that, “blacks and whites differ significantly in views of the role of race in criminal justice system” (152). It is likely someone who is black would vote if the candidate is promising to get rid of inequality. It is also possible that one group of people may not even vote at all if they believe the matter does not concern them. The voter's’ party affiliation can also affect them to vote. Let’s say a candidate is part of a party and they seem to have a good chance of winning. Naturally the other party would not want that candidate as their president and so, they would vote for whoever is representing their party. One example comes from the recent election; in which Republicans started to vote for Trump to avoid for Hillary, a Democratic, to become president. In addition, ...

Why is low voter turnout a concern? Simply put, non-participatory citizens are disengaged from an important aspect of political life. One’s decision to to participate can be linked to several issues. The concern facing the pattern of disengagement is that it lowers our collective

Our country is based on the foundation that our elected government should most accurately represent the voices and desires of every aspect of the population. However, that has always presented challenges. This is especially prevalent when people chose not to vote. The ramifications can include close elections, greater political division in the country, and disrespect to the fundamental ideals behind voting rights.

Election Day can change the future the country for good of for bad, and the people need to be educated about the importance of voting in the general elections; for that reason, they need to listen to their candidate, and decide what is the best for the

Voting equality means that when it is time that a decision on policy be made, each member must have an equal and effective opportunity to vote on a policy, with all votes being considered equal. Along with effective participation, voting equality is essential in constituting a democracy. For voting to be effective and equal, not only do citizens have to have reasonable access to voting locations, but they must also physically turn up and vote, something that does not always happen in practise. For instance, in the 2012 Presidential Election, 123,714,407 eligible citizens voted compared to 131,142,144 votes cast in the 2008 election (McDonald, 2012). That means there was a decrease in voter turnout of 3.4 percentage points from 2008 (61.6%) to 2012 (58.2%) (Andrews et al., 2012), prompting questions as to why 7,427,737 less voters participated. When a mere 58% of your country’s population chooses not to vote in the

Here is an example. We often talk about voting as a universal right — that casting a ballot is a civic duty for all people. But not everyone in the world has the freedom to vote. Voter inequality has deep roots in many countries, especially impacting already marginalized groups throughout history.