Persuasive Essay On Designer Babies

From a deontological perspective designer babies would be unethical because the idea goes against respect for and the dignity of an individual. The child’s value is no longer based on personality or character, but instead is based on whether their DNA represents the traits most desired in the society in which they live.

One reason designer babies should be illegal is because of its negative effects on society. Many believe designer babies “ [will cause] a greater gap in society between the ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots,’ or rather the ‘ideal’ and ‘non-ideal’ humans” (Catalano). Those who want their unborn child to be genetically adjusted would have to have enough money to have this procedure done. This could result in more drastic differences in wealth and socio-economic standing. Another gap in society that would come from designer babies is the unfair advantage someone with modified genetics could have. One person would have to work on a certain skill to get very good at it, whereas a genetically modified person would be programmed to be good

I personally do not agree with the idea of designer babies as you are changing the outcome of your baby and you are not accepting them as they are, you are changing their appearance the traits they would have had. You can’t use the excuse for medical reasons as cancer or heart disease develop over time and not when the baby is born. Now having a child is a big responsibility and if you are already deciding how you want your kid and what you want them to look like you might not be ready for a child. You should accept your child for who they are if you get a kid with a bad personality what's the point of being a parent if you can’t show them the right path or how to act. The child will no longer be yours but be the laboratories “experiment”.

In the chapter “Designer Babies” in the book Philosophy Gym by Stephen Law, discusses the possibility of designer babies, which would allow parents to choose the sex, intelligence, and appearance of their child. The pros and cons of this are discusses, along with the question of whether or not it would be morally right to be able to do this. I personally believe that it is not morally right to be able to “design” a child, because humans are made to be imperfect, and I believe that some of the ideologies behind “designing” are similar to that of the Nazis, and the belief that there could be a superior race of humans.

Why Designer Babies Should Be Banned What are designer babies? Designer babies are babies that are genetically engineered with technology for specially selected traits. Although this seems like a exceptional idea, there are many negative impacts of designer babies. There are many reasons why designer babies should not exist.

With technology rapidly increasing, the general public has developed a term known as designer babies. Designer babies refer to children whose genetics have been artificially selected or manipulated at the embryonic stage to exclude or produce certain traits. Designer baby technology, or reproductive genetics, combines genetic screening and engineering processes with in vitro fertilization (IVF) (Lerner 1). The big debate is whether or not it is right to genetically manipulate a baby to be born exactly as you wish. By the end of this essay you should agree with me that designer babies are morally wrong.

The first reason I do not support the creation of designer babies is that some important historical figure had mental sickness. For example, Albert Einstein had Asperger’s syndrome. According to the website Webmd.com is “The delay to develop basic akills such as the ability to socialize with others and communicate. Another person who had mental sickness was Isaac Newton, a famous

The designer baby debate is not only about how we are learning to control nature, but how this could destroy society as we know it (Thadani). Unregulated reproductive technologies in our market system could lead to terrible societal outcomes as many people would likely not sacrifice benefits for their children for the common good. Choices that parents make could therefore likely have a big affect on society (Berger). Families that will be able to afford this technology will be very little, and will increase the gap between the social classes (Thadani). This is partly because these babies would be very expensive to pay for as most insurance companies do not cover in-vitro fertilization treatment (Brownlee).The procedure will be very hard to come

This following essay will discuss about how the advantages of designer babies potentially act as the enhancer that emerge the harms in the society. It is just because of this advanced benefits that introduced the disadvantages of designer babies. It is likely that there will be both moral and safety objections as there has been for in vitro fertilization, stem cell science and early gene therapy. The moral objections range from concerns about the manipulation of the germline to worries about the patenting or commercialization of the technology itself. The safety concerns, much like we saw with early recombinant DNA research include both potential dangers to the offspring of patients treated and to the

The process of preimplantation includes many risks that may result in the baby’s death, or possible deformity. Changing the natural genes, may cause a “ripple” in the gene pool, and create complications further down the line of generations. If designer babies are our future, there are many changes that would be made to society--bad of good. Designer babies would be prettier, and smarter. That may create a a great rift between designer babies and “non-designer” babies. Designer babies may have more opportunities in jobs and colleges than non-designer babies. Or it may be the other way around. Maybe designer babies would be considered as “unnatural” and be shunned from society. Either way, it would great a great gap between our future generations that may be very difficult to fill

The production of a designer baby is, in my opinion, exploitation of the existence of the human individual. A designer baby is treated as an object and not a natural individual. This is not compatible with the human dignity that every individual is entitled to. The designer baby will not be accorded dignity since it will not be thinking for his good but to achieve a different goal. The designer baby is treated as a means only and not as an end. This is an abuse of the human dignity.

The first reason designer babies are not good is the health effects that can go wrong with the child. The child can experience development problems and won’t live up to what is expected from them. Also, designer babies could develop cancer later in their life because of their gene’s alteration. Designer babies gene’s are sometimes changed so they will be free of a certain type of cancer, but genes typically have more than one use. Changing one part of a gene can

Designer Babies should not be allowed because, both parents get a baby about what their ancestors and both parents genes want.

I think we should have designer babies because what if someone can’t have kids and they want a baby? What do they do adopted or just make a designer baby, just think about it would you want you child to have something wrong with them. So now with designer babies, your baby won’t have anything wrong with it that you don’t want. According to The Ethics of Editing Human Embryos “Imagine if genetic diseases could be removed from the very biological code of our species — a future in which the likes of hemophilia, cystic fibrosis or dozens of other afflictions are simply edited out of human embryos. In April online in the journal Protein and Cell, a team of Chinese scientists reported the first documented experiment to do just that.”

Designer babies to some are viewed as an awful thing or ‘playing god’ mostly because of their beliefs or simply because they feel as though it should be left alone. Others believe that it is a good thing and that it can help with a lot of things. I am going to be explaining how it can be both a good thing and bad thing or in this case, pros and cons of it