preview

Perspectives: The Atomic Bomb And Cold War

Better Essays

2.4 Perspectives: The atomic bomb → cold war

In August 1945 two atomic bombs were dropped on Japan; Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Atomic bomb finished World war two but did it lead to the Cold War between USSR and the US? David McReynolds believes that the bomb was to show strength and power, as that is why the US dropped the bomb. President Harry S Truman’s perspective states that the bomb was dropped to end World War 2, so he could bring his troops home.

President Harry S Truman was the President of the United States from 1945 - 1953. The relationship between Japan and the US was friendly, the US supplied resources. At the beginning of World War 2 the US started to short supply Japanese resources and froze Japanese assets. Japan retaliated by attacking Pearl Harbour.
Pearl Harbour was a military base filled with serviceman and resources. The attack of Pearl Harbour (7 December 1941) was unexpected. It knocked the US fleet out and killed 2,390 people, some were children.
He choose to drop The Atomic Bomb on Japan to end World War 2 as Japan posed a threat to the world as they have not yet given up fighting because Japan, …show more content…

You can tell just by reading the introduction let alone the article he has produced. He is very against the dropping of the bomb, believes it to be America’s Dark ages and perhaps the World's Dark ages.

The two perspectives above show the difference between people with their facts and reasoning. McReynolds evidence and opinion says President Truman did it to lead into the Cold War and intimidate the USSR and President Truman just wanted the war to end so he could rebuild his country back to the strong America it was before.
Japan is still recovering from the Atomic Bomb and America still getting the blame for starting the Cold War and ending WW2 in a horrific way. Would the US be great again? Will Japan ever fully recover? Why would a president want to start another

Get Access