preview

Perception In The Necklace

Decent Essays

“The Necklace” depicts a tale about a woman named Madame Mathilde Loisel and her spouse. Madame Mathilde Loisel has always been under the illusion that she was of high social standings and held possession over expensive material, all because of her beauty, but this was obviously all her imagination and she had nothing. She gets married to a poor clerk who tries his very best to keep her happy. One evening he comes home with an invitation to a ball that he worked hard to attain. He gives up his savings for a gun in order to fulfil his partner’s complaints of buying a fancy dress gown for the ball as she does not have one. She then asks her wealthier friend, Madame Forestier, to lend her an article of jewellery to go with her dress. After a night …show more content…

The necklace itself is a form of perception as it can be perceived however an individual wishes to see it. Mathilde wished to be rich and held extreme value for material possessions, she saw the necklace and automatically assumed that it must be expensive since her friend was quite wealthy, whereas her friend Madame Forestier knew how easily she could attain worldly objects and knew the necklace was artificial and real or not, it would look the same. “Oh, my poor Mathilde! Why, my necklace was paste! It was worth at most only five hundred francs”- Madame Forestier, she did not put much thought into her possessions like her friend did and so she did not hesitate in lending the necklace or any other piece of jewellery to her less fortunate friend. Every person only sees what they are looking for, perception is their thinking, and a person can change their life if they changed their perception. “The Necklace” made me realize that my perception of anything in general is not the truth, however it is how I want something to be perceived. This ideal can be applied to the media, they do not show the entire truth about any situation, however they show what they perceive, it is their viewpoint of the story, not only is this bias but it shows that there is no truth, there is never truth, only perception and viewpoint that ultimately leads to an individual’s downfall. Subsequently a positive …show more content…

Madame Mathilde Loise’s biggest mistake was following her husband’s order to lie instead of telling her friend the truth, that she had lost the necklace. “You must write to your friend,” he said, “that you have broken the clasp of her necklace and that you are having it mended. That will give us time to turn round.” To speak the truth takes a lot of courage, it may also hurt an individual but to prolong telling the truth is the act of avoiding the inevitable because the truth always comes out. To speak the truth is to set oneself free as they are not tied to any sense of guilt, they can move on with their lives and not worry about the consequences. This one act of hiding the truth had essentially ruined Madame Mathilde Loise and her husband’s life, there could have been many alternate roads that the pair could have taken, had they told the truth to Madame Forestier, they would not have had to sacrifice ten years of their lives for an artificial necklace that they deemed as real diamond. I suppose they both learnt from their mistakes and on their expedition they taught me that the truth always prevails as it is one of the most powerful attributes of

Get Access