Introduction
The Greek and Roman Parthenon and Pantheon are two of the most well-known buildings in the ancient world. They are also two of the most confused buildings from the ancient world. Not that anyone asked but I think it has to first do with the names they sound similar and that is always confusing to the human mind. Second, the architectural style of the buildings is very similar to each other which can be rather confusing.
Both buildings are also timeless testaments to their cultures. First in what they stand for and second for the architectural designs giving us something to remember them by. Third and lastly the power that they still present even today while the cultures are long dead and gone we still have their buildings to remind us that they were here.
The Parthenon and the
…show more content…
The Greeks invented the Ionic, Doric, and Corinthian orders of architecture that most of the world use today. The Romans heavily copied the Greeks style of Architecture in the Creation of the Pantheon in many ways they look the same. Well, maybe not exactly the same but close enough to make the average person wonder if the Romans were trying to copy the Parthenon.
Finally status. The Parthenon and the Pantheon were designed to create a way for control of the for the masses a place to bring to a head all of the religious fervor or political duty. While both used slightly different methods to obtain power, in the end, the goal was to establish power and it worked.
Differences
As I pointed out before the functions of the buildings were different the Parthenon was designed for politics with a hint of religion and the Pantheon was designed for religion and religion alone. The Parthenon was a place of political power as well as a meeting place for the now enslaved members of the Delian League. Whereas on the other hand the Pantheon was supposed to be the home of all the gods a place of great religious
Many similar characteristics are used throughout the Classical and Early Empire when the construction of temples was being built. Though old techniques were used, the advancement of new methods were being introduced to build faster, stronger, and in different shapes and sizes. We will discuss the Parthenon and the Pantheon; though similar in name, they do have some differences that represent the Greek and Roman styles.
The Pantheon deduces its name from Greek word meaning “All the gods of a religion”. The Pantheon was originally constructed as a famous temple in Rome which was devoted to all the gods of Ancient Rome. It is the best preserved building from Ancient Rome and was completed by 125 CE. Its magnificent dome is a living testimony to the genius of the Roman architects and as the building still remain undamaged, it offers a unique chance for the modern boulevardier to step back 2000 years and experience the glory that was Rome.
The Parthenon and the Pantheon are both amazing and detailed buildings. Although the Parthenon was built in Athens and the Pantheon in Rome, both of these buildings share some similarities, but are also different as well. In this paper I will share how the similarities and differences between Ancient Greece and Rome are seen in these two buildings.
They were both constructed as temples. Pantheon draws its inspiration from Parthenon, which can especially be seen through the use of 8 columns on the front of both buildings. Both of the buildings had large open spaces inside. The two buildings also use geometry in its perfect form. Parthenon is a perfect rectangle, while the interior of Pantheon is a perfect sphere.
The Parthenon and the Pantheon are both examples of classical architecture. They share many common architectural features due to the proximity of their builders. Their differences stem largely from the cultural differences of the Greeks and Romans. Those cultural differences extend even to the present day as both sites are currently in use in different capacities.
The Roman Pantheon is an architectural wonder built by the Roman's over 18 centuries ago that has had enormous impact on architectural design and techniques still today. Built under the reign of Emperor Hadrian 118-128A.D during the High Empire Period the Pantheon we know today was built in the same location as two prior pantheon's that both fell to fire (Kleiner 210). Although the exact artist(s) of that of the Pantheon are not particularly known credit goes to Emperor Hadrian whom dedicated the newly rebuilt Pantheon to Marcus Agrippa, the person whom created the very first pantheon that stood in the same spot(Moore). The word pantheon itself is of Greek orientation and means “a temple to all gods”(Kleiner 210) and the Roman Pantheon
The Parthenon is known as the Temple of Athena Parthenos. Phidias and his team (Ictinus and Callicrates) began the process of building the Parthenon in 447 B.C.E. “It is one of the main buildings in the Acropolis and was dedicated to honor Athena. The buildings showed a lot of wealth and power to the Athenian empire. The architecture of the Parthenon shows elements of the clarity.” The Parthenon has a rather uniquely structured building. There is nothing cookie-cutter about the shape. The surfaces are rarely straight and there are hardly any completely horizontal or vertical lines. Instead of using the straight lines they went with more of a slight curve. Also the floor was not flat it had a more pronounced curve than people had seen before which made it stand out. The outer floor was had about a 6-inch difference from the inner floor. The unusual structure of the Parthenon was not due to poor architect skills it was completely
In conclusion, both the Parthenon and the Pantheon are cultural heritages of two great ancient civilizations that have contributed much to our western society. Including things like the birth of democracy in Athens and the advances and the advanced and fearless way the Romans explored many aspects of life in society, architecture and knowledge. These buildings serve to remind us of the contribution these great ancient societies our modern societies and of their incredible architectural, artistical and mathematical
Let’s do a quick background check on the history and materials of the original Parthenon. On the rare and unbelievable chance you’ve never heard of or seen this amazing structure, allow me to try to paint a picture of it in your head.
In comparing the Parthenon and Pantheon Buildings there are many similarities and many differences noted. Each has a specific use and design though some of the elements are the same.
Though the Parthenon is now a ruin, it was built in part due to Pericles within the years 447 and 432 BCE (2012) and was used as a temple to honor the goddess, Athena. Immediately, the similarities you can notice is the columns that surround the temple. While the Parthenon has Doric columns, the Pantheon is held up by the more ornate, Corinthian columns. Additionally, on the outside, you can see relief carvings on the pediments, whereas the Pantheon only has a more practical phrase in Latin, "Built by Marcus Agrippa, son of Lucius, consul for the third time." (2014, para. 3) However, the most
The Parthenon and the Pantheon feels like they are the same thing, except that it is spelled differently. In reality, they are two different buildings in two different countries. I actually made a mistake thinking that the Parthenon was the Pantheon and vice versa. The Parthenon is in Greece which follows Greek art in that time. The Pantheon is in Italy, and was a building created by the Roman Empire. Unfortunately, the Parthenon is in ruins because it hasn’t been recently used. The Pantheon has been in use for nearly 2,000 years, so it still looks magnificent even until now. There are many other differences and similarities between these two buildings, which I will explain in this paper.
The Parthenon and the Pantheon are iconic structures from ancient times. Both have suffered through wars and turmoil over the last few millennia, as well as erosion due to natural causes, but they continue to be masterful representations of the classical style. We see similarities between the two with their use of classical Greek elements and intended function as temples, but there are also differences between them. The Parthenon, which began construction in 447 B.C., “...was designed by the architects Ictinus and Calibrates and is considered the most perfect example of the Doric style of Greek architecture” (Moulton, 1998a).
The Parthenon is often seen as the pinnacle of ancient Greek temple design and construction, the apex of a tradition that echoes down into our own architectural past. At the time of its construction, the Parthenon was
Greek and Roman temples are the most influential temples of all times. It is argued that the Greek influenced the Romans and this may be the reason why their temples are so alike. The Parthenon and the Pantheon are the most popular temples of both eras. However, the Pantheon does not look like other roman temples would to Greek temples – and this is because it has interior space and thus has a completely different composition. Despite their quite similar looks, Roman and Greek temples have unique differences in material, method, purpose, and others.