preview

Pam Patrick-Stone Argument

Decent Essays

Pam Patrick-Stone’s apparent lack of understanding and . She discredits the solidity of her argument with her inflammatory logic and blatant bias toward her own political agenda. Confusing morality with politics, she claims that a children’s show, (which she claims to be leftist), is harmful towards children. She narrow-mindedly misinterprets a show that challenges the gender norm with an LGBT Agenda, causing her to mascarade her conservative views as concern for her children.
Building her credibility throughout, she maintains a front as a God-Loving Chrision and mother. But her outrage and highly opinionated argument is disreputed when she mistakes the expression of feminine traits by a male character as transgenderism. Her integration of specific facts displays her …show more content…

The fact that she suggests that the show teaches kids about positive attributes yet is “corruptive filth” completely undermines her allegations. Her provocative word choice makes it difficult to take her seriously. She even has the audacity to claim that “the media is determined to pollute the minds“ of children. As Pam Patrick-Stone insists that her argument is about preserving morals on television, she specifically declares that the creator of the show “insists there’s no agenda”. This completely contradicts what the title suggests her entire writing is about.
As the show Shezow is not actually about being transgender, her motives for becoming outraged are questionable. She is masquerading as a concerned mother, when in reality her resentment is coming from her political views. She is infuriated about television programming because in her view “the FCC has become too liberal”. She has a clear bias towards conservative views. She doesn’t want Shezow off the air because it is “corrosive” to her kids, she wants it gone because she thinks it is “pushing the envelope of the leftist agenda”

Get Access