Oxfam Social Factors

A Harvard study conducted across 100 countries found that whether rich or poor, people who give to charity are happier. Perceived happiness increases, even more, when we see the impact of our gift has on someone.

Volunteering on teams will make the employees feel that they are a valuable part of what Company Q is doing to give back to the community. A model example of this behavior is that of Toms and their “One for One” campaign. “Toms’ employees participate in an annual Shoe Drop where they travel and donate a variety of goods to children. Their careers page specifically calls for employees that want to change lives and be a part of a movement” (Forman-Ortiz, 2013). If an employee feels that they are a valuable member of the company, the positive energy will most likely carry over to their day to day tasks. They will want to give good customer service and continue to help people. This aspect of social responsibility is a positive for the food bank, employees, customers from the community, and Company Q.

Helping others doesn’t have to be difficult. We know money is an issue throughout life and we can’t just provide everyone with money. But what can that money actually do? Money is traded in for goods and services right, so in theory, we don’t need money to help others, the question is more like what can we do for another. There is always one job out there that can improve our lives; we don’t have to be millionaires to contribute; we just have to try.

Denoting donations as voluntary for affluent individuals gives them an excuse to not fulfill any benefit. Among Americans in the bottom 20% of the income distribution, 3.2% of their total income is given to charities on average. In contrast, Americans in the top 20% of the income distribution give 1.3% of their total income to charity. The top 20% gives nearly 3x less than the bottom 20%. When society does not hold these affluent individuals accountable for their moral obligations, they are able to get away with minimizing their charity.

It is dehumanizing to make assumptions and determine how much help other people are entitled when the people’s lifestyles are not accounted for at all. The givers cannot stipulate another person’s worth without knowing the person. While one can only give within reasons, there are more that one can do to endorse their support for people in need or humanitarian organization(s). Helping cannot be based off of how much someone deserves. Givers need to give to the best of their

Due to the high success rate of Oxfam, they now have over 90 stores all over the world and over 100,000 employees and volunteers. However that doesn’t include the people which participate in fundraisers: such as fun runs, festivals, cycling and running events to support the charity. The Oxfam Headquarters is located in Cowley, Oxford. As a multinational charitable organisation, Oxfam has many supporters, nevertheless, they still want to better themselves and help more people. As they’re a charity based organisation, their aim isn’t to make a profit but to make a lot of money which they will then spend on helping people.

Everyone has a dream or something they want to follow in life. Some want material gain while others want to help as many people as they can. I’m not saying wanting material gain is a bad thing, but what I am saying is that for me, money is not the number one concern when my dream is to help others. My hunger to help others only grows by the day. Because of what’s going on in the world we live in today, I believe that it is important that those who are less fortunate than others have the assistance they need to get to an even playing field, health-wise, with others.

Mark Twain says greed is another of man’s failings. Of course, man is somewhat greedy. But, lots of men know how to control their greed, and also know to do favor for others. In other words, they are thoughtful (kind) and have mercy. For this moment, numberless charities are gathering the helpers and donations to support others who suffer by hunger and poorness. For a common example, there’s UNICEF. They work for saving children in hunger, teach them basic education and gender equality, try to prevent HIV & AIDS to children, protect children from violence, exploitation and abuse, and do policy advocacy and partnerships. They do these things only for the needy.

People suffer, it’s something we have to cope with. Some manage through it, others need a hand. We live our life just thinking how we can improve ourselves, and never thinking the alternative in how we can help others. Peter Singer mentions a great deal of how we need to donate money and recommends living on less, but never suggests other options to aid the underprivileged. But in 2014, Americans donate approximately 2% of disposable income to charity, and hasn’t change since. (Giving Facts: Charity Navigator) What Singer fails to say, is that there are more favorable ways to help the need than money.

Even though there are a number of instances when people help others who are in need,

Just like what we see, hear, and do everyday, our sociological factors also have effects on our perceptions of the world and things around us. An individual’s social location can lead him to wealth and success or prevent him from them. The positive consequences of being social animals lead human beings to become more social as time goes by, and symbolic interaction among individuals help us connect and understand each other in a society. Through the lenses of such sociological theories, sociological imagination “enables us to grasp history and biography and the relations between the two within society” and helps us understand the connections between social structures and our individual lives (Milgram).

He suggests that money given to a charity could morally bring about the same type of satisfaction, than if going on vacation or spending money on a video games (Singer 336.) Singer also suggests that often time’s society is afraid of where their money will end up or how it will be use when donated. Singer names four charities that are in existence which are single-handedly devoted to improving the lives of those less fortunate (Singer 337.)

In “Effective Altruism” by Peter Singer, Singer talks about how we can take actions that help others as much as possible. This is known as effective altruism. Effective altruism is a social movement that aims to revolutionize the way we live. Effective altruism encourages individuals to make altruism a central part of their lives and do as much good as possible, typically by contributing a fixed percentage of one's income to the world's best performing aid and development organizations. Philosopher Pete Singer for Ted Talks discuss that you can donate at least a tiny percentage of money and still be able to live a normal life. He also references many people who donated by individuals to to the world's poorest people can make a great

Sociology is the study of how social forces influence individuals living within a society. Any society is made of norms, values and beliefs that have the effect of constraining individuals’ thoughts and behaviors. Through understanding and sociological imagination, individuals can remove or at least lessen the social forces’ impacts that are causing the constraints.

Nestlé was founded in 1866 by Henri Nestlé and is today the world's biggest food and beverage company. Nestlé employed around 250,000 people from more than 70 countries and have factories or operations in almost every country in the world. The history of Nestlé began in Switzerland in 1867 when Henri Nestlé, the pharmacist, launched his product Farine Lactée Nestlé, a nutritious gruel for children. Henri used his surname, which means “little nest”, in both the company name and the logotype. The nest, which symbolizes security, family and nourishment, still plays a central role in Nestlé’s profile. Since it began over 130 years ago, Nestlé’s success with product innovations and business acquisitions