Thesis
Euthanasia debate opposes two sides in which one side argues that letting someone suffer is not ethical and the other side defend that to help someone to die is not ethical based on the morality that no one should kill or help someone to die (fundamental right that everyone is allowed to live), they judge that euthanasia should compromise the criminal code. For my own morality, I am for the euthanasia possibility for the people in need to die for the reason of the person’s well-being.
Premises
1. Against: The violation and/or the abuse of this right (right of euthanasia): helping someone to die without his willingly as when someone does not have his fully conscientious.(too degraded disease)
2. For: well-being of the person:
A little over nine years ago, a man succumbed to his thirty-year battle with multiple sclerosis. At the time of his death, his body bore little resemblance to the man who had once successfully coached two little league teams and held down three jobs. In the last year of his life, James Halsey decided that the debilitating cycle of drowning in his own internal body fluids, only to return to a state of awareness, no longer served his spirits and desires. Regrettably, he was not given the opportunity of a peaceful death. Instead, James spent the last days of his life pumped full of morphine, in harrowing pain as his family stood by, rendered helpless. He was denied an inherent right and the ability to exercise his independent will. Physician-assisted
It’s been 4 months since the car crash that has caused your husband to become brain dead. He is on a machine that is breathing for him and you know that he is in a great deal of pain. You keep asking for the doctors to pull the plug or give him meds to ease him into death, but euthanasia isn’t allowed where you live. Euthanasia is important because it will cause a lower amount of people who are suffering and in pain. Euthanasia should be legal in Indiana to end the suffering of terminally ill patients that are in unbearable pain and to leave the family of the person with less medical bills to pay. The first thing that needs to be done is the legalization of it.
Guthrie, P. (2006). Assisted suicide debated in the united states. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(6), 755-6. Retrieved January 31, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/204835513?accountid=39340
I believe in the power of storytelling. February 2015, Valentina Maureira lays in a hospital bed. From her room, she filmed and posted a youtube video in which she said and I quote: “My name is Valentina Maureira, I am fourteen and I suffer from cystic fibrosis. I need to speak urgently with the president because I am tired of living with this disease, and she can authorize an injection that will allow me to sleep forever.” A desperate plea from a young and innocent girl that managed to move her South American nation’s - Chile - 20 million people. Cystic fibrosis is a nasty incurable genetic disease where patients have their lungs clogged and organs thickened due to mucus. Her plea for euthanasia came after another patient who had been resting in a bed beside hers, died a month ago.
Many people today have very different opinions on Euthanasia. Some individuals may think that it is a form of murder while others see it as a way to cause a painless death of a person to in order to end or prevent suffering from a terminal illness (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2014). The purpose of this paper is to define active and passive euthanasia. Within this paper it will define the two types of euthanasia which are active and passive. This paper will also define the various levels of government and how a bill will
Life is held dear by many, and cherished by most. Many of us can take life for granted when we are healthy and happy. In the same token; one should consider a terminally ill patient, and where such a person may fit in; when it comes to their quality of life. When dealing with unforeseen special circumstance that present themselves, could logic and reasoning be set aside. One could argue that the element of life forms a different comparison; when applied to the average healthy person. This is where the controversy begins, and morals become touchy issues for most people. Should euthanasia be an alternative to end pain, and suffering in certain circumstances; or is euthanasia a mindless, selfish means to an end. Even worse; could euthanasia
Should a person have the right to die? It is a hot topic in today's society because many can't seem to find the answer to this question. Euthanasia is the kinning of an individual to relieve pain (TalkDeath). Euthanasia should be legal because many suffer from painful diseases, the cost for medicine is too high, and organ donation is in need.
Euthanasia is a global issue that is observed differently in many cultures and religions. In Japan, voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is not accepted to perform in all medical cases. However, it legally practices in the limit circumstances. In a study conducted on nurses’ attitudes toward patients’ requests for euthanasia, Tanida et al (2002) found that Japanese nurses didn’t support the patients’ request to die. They also didn’t want to engage in helping physicians perform euthanasia. 53% of the nurse who had been asking by patients to terminate their death denied taking active steps in this act. Only 23% of them participated in voluntary active euthanasia as something ethically right. And 14% agreed to practice if it were legal. The underlying
Nobody thinks of their death and desires it to be extremely painful or horrible. Rational human beings desire a good, dignified end to an ideally long and fruitful life. Circumstance, like luck, may not always be in your favor. It may not even be a terminal disease, which is so frequently used in pro-euthanasia arguments. It can be as savage as a freak accident or as simple as falling down the stairs to put you in a world of excruciating pain. While this is never to be wished on anyone, for those that have had the misfortune of being diagnosed with a terminal or painfully debilitating disease must have a choice out of it. Do we, who so desire a good death, have the right to judge others’ state when we know nothing of it? Do we have the right
A state's categorical ban on physician assistance to suicide -- as applied to competent, terminally ill patients who wish to avoid unendurable pain and hasten inevitable death -- substantially interferes with this protected liberty interest and cannot be sustained." - ACLU [3]
This paper explores euthanasia from the perspective of the supplicant and the practitioner. Additionally, this paper considers euthanasia’s impact on the clients and the counsellors coping mechanisms with crises, trauma and/or loss. Firstly, definitions, discussions and examinations about euthanasia are presented, using the term “euthanasia” interchangeably with euthanasia’s different forms of death. Second, the counsellor’s value conflicts between euthanasia and the adherence to a professional and ethical code including self-awareness and self-care solutions is discussed. People’s psychological development, personality and character traits are examined in their response to crises, trauma and/or loss. Finally, this paper concludes
Any human being should be able to make the decision if they want to live or if they want to die. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or an irreversible coma. Though it is illegal in most countries, it is legal in Oregon and Washington and should be legal everywhere. To be able to make the decision of dying the patient must be an adult, must have two oral and one written request, must be at least between 15 days between the first and last request, patient must have less than six months to live, and the prognosis must be consulted by two physicians. Both of the doctors must confirm that the patient is capable of making this decision and must also confirm that the patient does not have a
Euthanasia is deliberated to painless and peaceful natural deaths in old age that occur in calm and acquainted surroundings, its process is where a licensed physician ends the lifespan of another person to end their pain or distress. There are two types of euthanasian standings, which are voluntary and involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia is when a person is killed upon that person's demand for explanations of suffering. Involuntary euthanasia is the mercy killing of a physically or legally incompetent person, such as a child or a irrational elderly patient, at the request of, or by, a caregiver or family member. On the other hand, there is also assisted suicide; which occurs when one person gives another person the instructions, means, or capability to bring about their own death. Euthanasia, however, is illegal. In the contemporary years, "aid in dying" movement has made incremental gains, but the concern remains controversial. Some people fear that allowing euthanasia sends the message, "it's better to be dead than sick or disabled".
Unless a person has a terminally ill family member or a friend, that person will most likely not understand the complex debate surrounding euthanasia. The recent high profile case of a newlywed woman diagnosed with a brain tumor who moved to Oregon to ensure her right to die put euthanasia in the spotlight in the United States. Understanding the traditional methods doctors used to communicate about terminal illness, the ethical issues faced by participating health care providers, and the legal issues surrounding euthanasia, and the reasons why people consider assisted suicide can enable individuals to make better informed decisions about their own wishes.
In conducting more research on Euthanasia or assisted suicide, I was able to find more arguments on why the topic is so debated about in the medical field. Some doctors and people today feel that no patient should be able to request EAS because of the emotional impacts it has on the families of the patients involved and the pressure it puts on the physicians administering it. In my opinion, it shouldn’t be about the families or the doctors, it should be about the patients who are the ones suffering and are at the stage in their lives when they want to suffer no more. The article I found called “Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living?” I read that even though EAS is