Our paper today will be on Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo is an American bank that was created in 1852 by Henry Wells and James Fargo. It is the second largest bank in the USA in terms of market cap, operates in over 42 countries around the world, and has over 260,000 employees.
In 2016, federal regulators caught Wells Fargo creating millions of fake bank and credit card accounts; over 1.5 million bank accounts were created. Furthermore, federal regulators also said that 565,443 credit cards were created, and 1400 of those accounts had been charged over 400,000 dollars in fees. Wells Fargo employees broke many ethical and legal boundaries and engaged in counterproductive work behavior.
Counterproductive work behavior has a negative
…show more content…
This practice was so common that Wells Fargo employees had several methods for doing this. The first method is sand bagging. Sand Bagging involves failing to open accounts by customers at their requested date, instead accumulating accounts to open in the next sales period to inflate profits. Another practice was called Pinning which was creating pin numbers without customer’s authorization, and attaching them to credit cards. Then employees would impersonate customers on Wells Fargo’s computers and use these pin numbers to create online banking and bills for customers. Finally, a practice called bundling was done where Wells Fargo employees would mislead customers saying that certain banking products were only available in bundles which forced customers to add more products than they wanted. So, one wonders, how could this have happened? Why did high expectations of sales lead to unethical, almost criminal behaviour? This is tied to Goal Setting theory. Goal setting theory, created by Edwin Locke, states that employees are motivated by clear goals, and appropriate feedback. Individuals that were given clear, specific and difficult goals had greater performance than individuals given general and easy goals. However, research has shown that setting unattainable and challenging goals can lead to risky or even unethical behaviour. A study done by
This practice was so common that Wells Fargo employees had several methods for doing this. The first method is sand bagging. Sand Bagging involves failing to open accounts by customers at their requested date, instead accumulating accounts to open in the next sales period to inflate profits. Another practice was called Pinning which was creating pin numbers without customer’s authorization, and attaching them to credit cards. Then employees would impersonate customers on Wells Fargo’s computers and use these pin numbers to create online banking and bills for customers. Finally, a practice called bundling was done where Wells Fargo employees would mislead customers saying that certain banking products were only available in bundles which forced customers to add more products than they wanted.
Businessmen in New York establish Wells, Fargo and Company, destined to become the leading freight and banking company of the West.
Wells Fargo has been penalized and has been fined 185 million dollars because they were opening fake accounts.
Wells Fargo’s deposits totaled $847.9 billion at December 31, 2010, compared with $824.0 billion at December 31, 2009. (p 53 on 10k)
Wells Fargo has a social responsibility to its customers to fulfill their economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic needs. The scandal has presented numerous legal issues. It was negligent of the bank's executives and managers by placing impossible sales goals on lower level employees then encouraging, and pressuring them to meet these goals. The use of customer's information for fraudulent purposes was an invasion of customers privacy. Wells Fargo has violated the Federal Trade Commission Act which protects customers from unfair practices and has also violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Thorne, 2011).
However, the customer did not know about some of the services being provided because the financial advisor would not reveal the services being charged. A particular service was insurance on the vehicle a customer was financing even though the customer had their own insurance. This action alone cost Wells Fargo over $200 million in a settlement to over 800,000 customers for the insurance fraud (Goldfarb, 2017). Wells Fargo has not lived up to the management’s ethical values stated for the organization to follow. The CEO and board chairman has not led by example because their salary and bonus was depending on the amount of services provided.
Employee rewards were linked to how many accounts they could open. Employees could reach both the rewards and sales quota by moving money out of one account to another. Banks require a minimum amount of $1,500 in a debit account or else they charge a fee; by moving money into a separate account, the customer’s real account would be under the minimum thus leaving customers to pay that fee. (Wells Fargo, 2017 March 14) By having these accounts, workers would reach their quota and the company got more money; this lead Wells Fargo to hold the title of most profitable and highest bank (Avalos, 2016). Fake unpaid credit card accounts have totaled over $400,000 in overdue fees. The government has charged Wells Fargo to pay five million to refund all customers. Ranging from tellers to corporate, over 5,300 employees who were involved in the scam have been fired. (Blake,
Wells, Fargo & Co. came into America in the age of economic boom and westward expansion, and
This issue of fake customer accounts should be taken as a serious problem raised among customers whose trust in financial institutions keep diminishing. At the center of this fiasco was the atmosphere created at Wells Fargo that enabled this type of fraudulent activity. Inadvertently or not, Wells Fargo ultimately designed a system that encouraged employees to open a lot of falsified accounts. When Wells Fargo imposed unrealistic sales quotas on its employees, it naturally drove its bankers to engage in fraudulent behavior to meet those almost unreachable goals. Over the few decades, Wells Fargo had built up a reputation detaching itself from the likes of Wall Street by putting their customers first before money. However, one cannot help but think that Wells Fargo put money before customers as their aggressive sales goals led to the opening of unauthorized accounts without customer knowledge. Not only was this explicit fraudulent activity, but it questions the precautionary measures that were either in place and circumvented, or rather not in place at all. Both ways, Wells Fargo was doing something wrong, and the doors are now wide open for regulators to fully investigate how such unethical and illegal activity
The ethics of the bank requires that there is ethics of integrity. It is supposed to be created through a culture in the bank and it should be one of the banks priorities because this is a business and they gain the profits from the people they serve on daily basis. Even if the bank shall survive this wave of scandal is so difficult now to convince any client to join this Wells Fargo which shall cause them a lot of money. Also all the old customers may start withdrawing and looking for other banks which they feel are more secure when they are keeping the money for them. It is so hurting and distrustful for a banking instead of accruing money in the accounts of their customers what they wells was doing was that it was misusing their money and giving them extra fees.
Scandals in the business world are not an uncommon topic to appear in new headlines. Recently Wells Fargo has fired over 5,000 employees for creating over 2 million fake accounts. New bank and credit card accounts were created without prior knowledge from their customers. The accounts that were created resulted in those customers inquiring fees such as overdraft fees. These fake accounts have been created over a five-year timeframe.
Well Fargo is currently being sued over 185 Million Dollars and 5,300 were fired for making fake account.
Wells Fargo fired 5300 employees. The employees took millions in fees by regularly opening new
Wells Fargo is an American multinational diversified financial services company. The company operates throughout the world. It is one of the largest banks in the US in the state of assets. Moreover, Wells Fargo is the largest market capitalization bank in the US. It takes the second category in the field of deposits, delivery of home mortgage services, and delivery of credit cards. The company has its headquarters in Francisco, California. The company has coverage of more than twenty-four states in the US. In every state, it has established its headquarters that act as distribution and storage regions for the company's products and services. The company offers insurance, banking, mortgage, and consumer financing through the sale and distribution of its networks across the US. The advantages of Wells Fargo Company are widely distributed: they have helped it realize a stable market in the United States and around the globe.
** Wells Fargo’s decentralized corporate structure gave the Community Banks Leadership the freedom to manage as they pleased and created an environment that rejected any oversight from outside the community banks ranks. Lack of centralized reporting and oversight made it difficult for the corporate office to identify trends or warning signs that lead to issue. Most of the warning signs were occurring at the local level, but there were a few major signs of a problem that bubbled up to the corporate which they seemed to ignore or did not identify as a potential problem.