preview

On Every Front Chapter 1 Summary

Good Essays

On Every Front: The Making of the Cold War
In the first chapter of the book, the author describes the devastation that the world saw after World War II was over. Paterson describes recollections about individuals like Winston Churchill who surveyed the rubble upon conclusion of the war. One excerpt I found interesting was when the prime minister entered what was left of Adolf Hitler’s chancellery. Churchill noted that his marble desk now was in a thousand pieces. The same day that Churchill surveyed Berlin, United States President Harry Truman got to look at the former Nazi Capital. As Truman is astounded by the destruction, he remarked “That’s what happens when a man overreaches himself.” The author also describes how drastically different …show more content…

The author notes that initially, Congress was compliant with Truman giving him most of the power when it came to decision making. Paterson also notes that the public were “yea-sayers.” Early in the chapter, it is said that occasionally Truman officials suggested that their decisions were influenced by the attitude of the American public. However, the author points out that in the majority, President Truman did what he thought he needed to do and “successfully persuaded the reluctant to walk his path.” The book summarizes that even though Truman and his Cabinet officials charted their own path, they were aware of public opinion and feared negative attitudes towards foreign policy. This is exemplified in the naming of the Marshall Plan. In 1947, Clark Clifford urged Harry Truman to name it the “Truman Plan.” Truman replied, “Are you crazy? If we sent it up to that Republican Congress with my name on it, they’d tear it apart.” Paterson also suggests that isolationism was not the public opinion, rather it was indifference and ignorance to foreign policy actions. Paterson notes that most Americans cared far more about domestic policy than they did foreign policy. Sam Rayburn, Speaker of the House quoted that “America has either one voice or none, and that voice is the voice of the President-whether everybody agrees with …show more content…

Both the ideologies of the United States and the Soviets were unchanging and unwilling to compromise. Given the Soviets recent advances like obtaining “the bomb” and Mao Tse-tung’s victory for communist china, Americans were beginning to conclude that something had to be done. Victory was the only option. This belief can be echoed by the fact that neither President Truman or Secretary Acheson were willing to give in to appeasement. Acheson announced that the U.S would not “pull down the blinds and sit in the parlor with a loaded shotgun, waiting.” Furthermore, in 1950 Harry Truman ordered the production of the hydrogen bomb. In April of 1950, the National Security Council documented “NSC-68” which was a call to expanding defense efforts against the Soviet Union. Acheson feared that the public would be taken back by this idea, believing that the best solution would be to stay out of foreign affairs. Paterson notes that come June 1950, this attitude would change. In the summer of 1950, Soviet forces in North Korea invaded the American-backed South Korea. This event confirmed the idea that the Soviets were aggressive, and the United States needed to intervene. More so, when the two parties met together in attempts to ease tension and make headway in negotiation talks, there

Get Access