preview

On Dumpster Diving Analysis

Good Essays

What is apathy anyway? Apathy is the lack of interest, enthusiasm, or concern for what is going on around us. We all experience apathy occasionally when we feel unmotivated or uninterested in our daily tasks. However, this is normal from time to time while constantly behaving without feeling is not. As a result of people wanting to fit in with others so they will be liked, being wasteful, and wanting others to get hurt they have caused a growing immense problem. The problem is not only are people being careless and ignorant, but they are expressing widespread apathy. People always seem to worry about what other people think. Also, many people, especially Americans, are very wasteful. Lastly, people do not seem to care if other people get hurt. …show more content…

As discussed in “On Dumpster Diving,” students will throw out food around breaks as a result of not knowing when it will spoil or if it already has. Therefore, they will throw out items that are unlikely to spoil in any reasonable time. “The student does not know that, and since it is Daddy’s money, the student decides not to take a chance” (Eighner, 5). There is a number of reasons why students throw out items. “But in the case of discards from student apartments, the answer may be that the item was thrown out through carelessness, ignorance, or wastefulness” (Eighner, 5). This is a result of the attitude of knowing one can get more where they got what they have. In “On Dumpster Diving,” Lars Eighner explains how we get an attitude of knowing we can always get more. “I think this is an attitude I share with the very wealthy - we both know there is plenty more where what we have came from” (Eighner, 13). When one works to earn something whether it be money or an object of value, they are less likely to be wasteful. Also, Lars Eighner explains how what he has already been thrown out once so it is valueless to someone. He also focuses on value as being a measure of usefulness. “A thing I cannot use or make useful, perhaps by trading, has no value however rare or fine it may be” (Eighner, …show more content…

“Not one person telephoned the police during the assault; one witness called after the woman was dead” (Gansberg, 1). Why when someone was screaming for their life would not one person call the police? Were these people afraid or did they just not care? According to “Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police,” the witness have a difficult time explaining why they did not call police. “A housewife, knowingly if quite casually, said, “We thought it was a lovers’ quarrel.” A husband and wife both said, “Frankly, we were afraid.” They seemed aware of the fact that events might have been different. A distraught woman, wiping her hands in her apron, said, “I didn’t want my husband to get involved” (Gansberg, 3). “Asked why they hadn’t called the police, she shrugged and replied: ‘I don’t know’” (Gansberg, 4). “Why hadn’t he called the police at the time? ‘I was tired,’ he said without emotion. ‘I went back to bed’” (Gansberg,

Get Access