Misplacing items happens to every individual throughout their lives. For Melissa, she happened to misplace her keys. In order to find her keys, Melissa must know something about them. It is in my view that Melissa does not know anything about her keys because she lacks knowledge that they are missing as well as how to find them. Given the scenario, there is a plausible belief that Melissa has concerning the whereabouts of her keys. The belief is that her keys are somewhere in her house. We know this belief is true because, at the end of the scenario, Melissa pulls her keys out of the coffee table drawer. However, for Melissa, the belief is plausible as she could have wasted time searching her house when her keys were not actually there. In …show more content…
Rather, when she found her keys in the drawer, it was more of a lucky guess. Yet again, the lack of a process has led to this conclusion. There are a couple of processes Melissa could use to have knowledge-how according to a weaker standard. The first is retracing her steps. With this, Melissa would recall the previous hours to determine if her keys were left somewhere or completely lost. She could even instill the help of a friend. Another process is using technology. In today’s world, there are trackers that tag a set of keys and sends information to an app on a smartphone. Melissa could use this information to determine the whereabouts of her keys rather than aimlessly searching. While Melissa does not have any knowledge concerning the whereabouts of the keys, the question of whether Melissa is using reason throughout the scenario remains. Reason is critical in making daily decisions. In general, Melissa is lacking reason in all aspects of the scenario. This is not due to the fact that Melissa is female. According to Margaret Atherton, reason is not a gendered concept. Rather, reason is needed in all genders to aid in making appropriate decisions and living the best life possible (Atherton 32). Through her view of Cartesian reason, Atherton explains why reason is not a gendered
The expression of lanes 3,4,6,7,8 and 9 were expected but the expression of lane 5 was not expected. The reason lanes 3,4,6,7,8 were expected is that lanes 4,5,7,8 contain genomic DNA, which should contain multiple genes including the genes for Heat shock resistants. Also the genomic DNA in lane 4 and 8 under went heat shock condition, which led to the expression and amplification of Heat shock resistant proteins. This is also the case for lane 6, which contains heatshock cDNA. Since it contains cDNA that underwent heat shock condtion, that means the gene is being express and amplified in order to resist those heated condotions.
I review few of the vouchers and what I see is that the providers did the drug test to the patients b/c they are prescribing pain medications or some of the patients coming for F/u on their pain medications refills. I review and study the attachment and I'm not 100% sure if we can use any of these codes for support the CPT code 80300.
CD4 is a glycoprotein found on the surface of immune cells such as T helper cells, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. HIV infects cells of the immune system called T lymphocytes (T cells) and macrophages. HIV has an envelope and contains two copies of single-stranded RNA as the genome. Within the viral capsid are important viral enzymes called reverse transcriptase, integrase, and protease. The HIV virus has a spike protein that is called gp120, and the host cell receptor is CD4+. HIV belongs to a class of viruses called retroviruses. Retroviruses are RNA viruses, and to replicate or reproduce, they must make a DNA copy of their RNA through transcription and translation. It is the DNA genes that allow the
SOW says that both FS 5.6.5 and FS 6.0 should be certified on WAS 8.5 with Java Runtime 1.5.0, as supported by WebSphere (64bit).
Dermatophyte infections occur throughout the life span in both the sexes. However, tinea capitis is usually confined to children, and is rarely seen in adults. On the other hand, Tinea pedis is uncommon under the age of ten.
The first and for most important question is; how much money does the company have. Is the company capable to pay a large sum upfront for the equipment or only small payments each month?
By using the border, internal and host firewalls, this is what creates defense in depth. Because an attacker must defeat all of these devices in order to get into a company’s network to cause great damage (Boyle & Panko, 2015, pp.
Mission-creep is when a certain organization is assigned a task and then the organization expands their agenda past the main goal of the original task. There is a desire of the organization to essentially keep going after their initial task has already been completed. An example of this is when the US Department of Agriculture wanted submachine guns for its law enforcers, for this bureaucracy does not and should not have a need for them. Another example would be when the Department of Homeland Security created fusion centers after 9/11 to monitor potential terrorist communication, but these fusions pried into other crimes aside from terrorism. Mission-creep is a potential problem for keeping bureaucracies focused because they are going beyond what is relevant when there are other things to be accomplished. Mission-creep in bureaucracies is essentially like a person who recently cut their lawn to keep it looking nice, but then in turn wanted to keep going and mow the rest of the neighborhood’s lawns as well to make the whole neighborhood look nice.
Mrs. Van Bliven faked the robbery of her necklace. If someone was going to punch through a window If someone was to punch through a piece of glass shards of the glass would be punched out opposite of where you were standing. The shards of the from the door are pushed outward and are lying outside on the patio. This means whoever broke the glass was already inside the apartment. After stealing a necklace, someone would take the necklace with them but after further examination of the crime scene the necklace will be found in the plant. This proves that the crime scene must have been staged because someone would not break into a house to change the location of the necklace when they get nothing in return. Since the crime scene was staged, it means
The global permission acceptance breaks the policy of least privilege due to the fact that it allows access to items that a user believes to be protected and are not due to the fact that it is placed in an open environment. The open environment is out there and is available to all who happen to be connected. The concept of the least privilege is that it limits who is able to access an item. The item is able to be accessed only after permission have been granted by the owner. When the global acceptance is utilized there is really no control over who is able to see the information due to the fact that the security has been removed to make it easier to be used. Although there are instances where an application has to be granted permission
Melissa is driving through her neighborhood, talking on a cell phone. Because she is distracted, she missed the new stop sign that was put in at an intersection. A police officer sees this and promptly pulls her over. When asked why she didn’t stop at the stop sign, Melissa replies that she didn’t see the sign. Melissa most likely did see the sign, her brain just didn’t process it correctly.
Explain the book's subtitle: "Knowing more and Understanding less in the age of big data" What do you think Michael Lynch means?
Our interpretation isn’t always accurate assumption. However, perception checking in chapter 4 was very helpful skill for me. I had an opportunity to use that skill recently. My friends and I were planning to discuss about searching for our dwelling at night. When we tried to start discussion, we noticed we were missing one person. He left my house without saying anything. We called and texted him to come back to talk, but he didn’t respond to the phone either the text. We had no idea what’s going on, but we just started discussion without him. On the following day, I asked him “You left my house without a words, so we worried about you. We guessed you got an urgent call and was in hurry or you were really sleepy, so you just went home. What
So I have concluded that I still think that Angela did it. The reason is because of this for Phillip’s we do know that he believed that Caroline did it that his story pretty did match the one in the beginning of the story. The thing is that not a lot of people would catch on is that he did claim that Caroline did bring drinks to Amyas but he also did say so did Angela right before hand which is kind of a hint. For Phillip’s story is he does now believe that Caroline is incident he was giving good explanations on why it is possible. He mentioned that he heard someone in his lab
In her words, “not everything can be proved with facts so I don’t rely on that for everything.” Her initial thought for evidence was the concept of evolution—rather than search out all the facts and rely on those entirely, she said considering it for herself is the major part of her belief. Many claims of evidence could be read, but most important to her is what she feels and believes to make sense based on her religious beliefs. Evolution cannot be fully proven with fact, so she relies more on her emotions and feelings of what she believes to be