preview

Nietzsche's Genealogy Of Morality

Good Essays

In his Genealogy of Morals, Friedrich Nietzsche examines the origins of the pervading moral system of his time to Christian values, which elevate restraint and self-denial. In his writings, Marx attributes societal ills to capitalism and the exploitation of the working class.
Marx and Nietzsche trace depression and the modern malaise to people's inabilities to realize their potential and act on human instinct, which can be formalized with a notion of alienation of the self, because the constraints imposed by capitalism and Christian morality, respectively, cause individuals to develop identities distinct from their own, so each author calls for the abandonment of these systems. Though Marx and Nietzsche discuss different institutions and …show more content…

Tracing the origins of Western morality, Nietzsche attributes the adoption of slave morality to the appeal of Christianity to Roman underclass, the poor and powerless (the “weak”) who favored the ideas that their suffering was justified and that the strong were unjust for their excess and success. Moreover, the disparity between the social classes creates a form of enmity, which Nietzsche calls resentiment, that brings about systems of slave morality based on subverting the master morality of the ruling class. Slave morality, Nietzsche says, is based on the valuation of restraint and meekness, in stark contrast to human tendency to fulfill desires and seek power, which ruling class is able to do but the weak are not. Slave morality then arises as defense mechanism of the weak who are incapable of fulfilling their desires – the weak convince themselves that they do not want what they cannot have. Adherence to slave morality consequently demands self-denial and rejection of the one's true feelings and thoughts. Mirroring Marx's treatment of identity, Nietzsche's description of how slave morality can also create unnatural identities via the ascetic ideal and corrupts human endeavors. Though the ascetic ideal has different means for different people, it is at its core the idealization of willing nothing and …show more content…

Since Marx argues that nearly all societal ills, including those that create self-estrangement and the modern malaise, can be traced to the capitalist mode of production, it follows that most natural solution to these problems is the abolition of private property, which enables the capitalist system. Marx assumes that “every class struggle is a political struggle” and proceeds to argue that the overthrow of capitalism and the end of class struggle is an inherently political endeavor (481), so Marx calls for the creation of a political party with a singular goal: the abolition of private property (485). Abolishing private property, however, is a radical proposal and requires many other changes, including the implementation of an income tax, abolishing inheritance, the overhaul of the bourgeois family structure, and state control of the means of production (490). Only via such a revolutionary process, Marx claims, can a society evolve away from capitalism to socialism and eventually communism, wherein the problems of class struggle and consequently the modern malaise can be

Get Access