Nietzsche's Argument Essay

Nietzsche strongest argument was that, “Human nature is always driven by “the will to power””, but religion will tell one otherwise, saying that one should forbid their bad desires. Nietzsche is quite critical in particular towards Christianity since it was stated as the religion of slaves and pity by Nietzsche, caused by limiting one’s personal development since they were too obsessed with the treasures of the afterlife. Having said that, Nietzsche also referred to Buddhism as the nihilistic and the “desire for nothingness” religion, however he does praise certain aspects of the Buddhist teaching in comparison to Jesus’. Last but foremost, Nietzsche proves Socrates death to be at the hands of the acceptance of slave morality. For those who practice religion are guaranteed to fall as a slave rather than to become their own master due to all the restriction and standards set up by God. I simply do agree with Nietzsche due to all the evidence connecting back to each and every religion and philosophers. One must strive to reach and achieve their desire in order to be satisfied with one’s life. As people say, “no pain, no gain”, therefore one must live through all the suffering to accomplish greatness in their lives and make the most out of the given life. One can conclude, the practice of religion led many to the acceptance of slave

Nietzsche was a revolutionary author and philosopher who has had a tremendous impact on German culture up through the twentieth century and even today. Nietzsche's views were very unlike the popular and conventional beliefs and practices of his time and nearly all of his published works were, and still are, rather controversial, especially in On the Genealogy of Morals. His philosophies are more than just controversial and unconventional viewpoints, however; they are absolutely extreme and dangerous if taken out of context or misinterpreted. After Nietzsche's death it took very little for his sister to make some slight alterations to his works to go along with Nazi ideology.

In this Commentary of sections 1-7 of essay two in Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Genealogy of Morals, I will give a brief overview of the text, to help with showing the content that the comment covers, the go deeper into the individual sections and relate them to Nietzsche’s way of thinking and also look into any problems or solutions offered by those arguments.

Nietzsche’s proposal “the real philosophers of Greece are those before Socrates” (1888, p. 437) clearly demonstrates his stance and attitude towards Platonism. Nietzsche, as a philologist, was enamoured with the ancient Greeks, their freedom, unbridled and unrestrained passions and their pledge for an instinctual,

For my sixth topics for consideration assignment I chose to explain what I think Nietzsche means when he says to lie creatively. I believe Nietzsche is talking about true happiness with yourself when he says to lie creatively. In psychology people have many selves of their personality. We all have a self-serving bias which actually is a lie to yourself to keep you happy or feel good about yourself. It is natural for every one of us to feel better than other people, but it is not the truth. We also do not act exactly like ourselves in public the way we do in private. Our self-presentation to the public is not exactly a lie for who we are as an identity. It is actually a self-helping mechanism we use to protect ourselves around people, and help us advance to gain better opportunities. We tend to make ourselves look better, and we act like we are important, and special, but we are not all special in reality. If we did not naturally lie to ourselves about being great and special, the population of humanity may struggle worse with

On the Genealogy of Morals by Friedrich Nietzsche is typically listed as one of the most important philosophical works of the modern era. It is only modern, of course, to philosophical standards, being a mere 129 years old. It is also one of the most controversial works of its time, having the dubious distinction of being connected to Nazi ideology; it also has a not very subtle racist, sexist, and Darwinist bent that is a reflection of Nietzsche himself. That being said, I think that it is also serially misunderstood. Nietzsche directly mentions the role of interpretation in ethical discourse in the Genealogy, and the interpretive element factors heavily into one’s understanding of the polemic and by extension, ethics philosophy as a whole. Throughout the book, Nietzsche uses interpretation as a tool in itself to make a constructivist and existentialist argument about the history of ethics as whole. His idea that man has used interpretation throughout history, and the interpretive elements in Genealogy outside of the historical analysis, seem to say that almost all ethics are derived from interpretation and therefore constructivist in nature, which is a heavily existentialist argument. For example, the entirety of the first essay is based heavily upon the role of interpretation in the development of the early ethical systems that Nietzsche argues are built on the

After connecting the passage to Nietzsche’s opinion of a fulfilled lifestyle, I believe that he would disagree with Smith’s way of living. The two have contrasting ideas, in which Nietzsche’s seems to be a more ethical one in the fullest sense.

Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Nietzsche are two widely acclaimed philosophers due to the groundwork they made towards the philosophical principles of morality. However, even though they both have openly discussed their views, they have ended up contradicting each other. Kant implied that morality is not learned, but rather predestined, whereas Nietzsche alluded to a experience based morality, or one that is learned through actions and memories. Although these two men have accepted views of morality, the ideas of Nietzsche seem more applicable in relation to the present day; the world is constantly changing. There are two separate scenarios in which the issues of 'thou shalt not lie ' and 'thou shalt not steal, ' are morally assessed. The end results are supportive towards Nietzsche 's principles and detrimental towards Kant 's ideas. Overall, the moral concepts of Nietzsche will prevail as a result, illustrating the more probable use of his ideology.

Let us begin from how Nietzsche frames genealogy first and foremost as a “genealogy of morals”. Accordingly, it is crucial that we understand what Nietzsche takes morality to be. According to Richard Schacht, 'morals […] are most properly thought of as a loosely related family of norms pertaining to human conduct of various sorts […]' . Moreover, Schacht adds that morals are to be seen in relationship with our 'forms or spheres of life […] the various sorts of sociocultural formations and configurations […] setting the contexts of the greater part of what we variously do in the course of our socioculturally articulated lives' . Morals are therefore normative codes according to which we orientate ourselves in the context of different spheres

The beginning of the nineteen century was characterized philosophically by the dominance of a new philosophy stream, Nihilism. This philosophy movement was characterized by its defeatist attitude towards life. The Nihilist’s portrayal of life was focused on its suffering and meaningless nature, a pessimistic attitude that shared by the Romantic society of the time. For the Nihilists, like Schopenhauer, the solution and attitude that man should take towards life’s suffering nature was the rejection of life itself, removing yourself from life and desire was the only way of escaping man’s painful destiny. On this philosophical and historical context Nietzsche developed his philosophy.

Nietzsche was originally quite religious. His father was a Lutheran minister, and he studied theology at the University of Bonn. During his studies, however, he learned of the philosophy of Arthur

According to Friedrich Nietzsche, you may run into many obstacles in your life, but if you overcome those obstacles, then you will become stronger. The point that has been developed in this quote is very strong, and lets everyone know to overcome any obstacles occurring. Subsequently, the point which is developed in the quote is the obstacles which come in life can be tough and challenging, but when you conquer those obstacles, than you become a much, much stronger individual. There is no extent to how this quotation applies to anyone’s life. First of all, if you were bullied or are being bullied, then you develop thick skin and toughness, and that made you a stronger person. Another example is if someone gossips behind your back, then you

Nietzsche introduced an idea of philosophy that was more than simply a rational groundwork of existence or as the pursuit of an absolute truth. Instead, he suggested that philosophy is something to be respected as a personal interpretation of life and all its faculties (morality, existentialism etc.) and that was – for him - focused on life affirmation. Furthermore, this thinking implies that philosophy is not a be all and end all answer to life’s questions; rather, it is merely a

What is morality? Who determines right and wrong? For philosophers Nietzsche and Aquinas, questions such as this will derive different answers. Take Dominican friar, Thomas Aquinas. According to Aquinas, humans have a natural moral compass that governs our understanding of right and wrong, a theory called “Natural Law.” Natural law is more or less what is more popularly known as a “Conscious”, an almost primal instinct telling us whether something is right or wrong.For example: murder, stealing, rape etc. It is naturally understood (or should be natural understood) amongst nearly all beings, that taking another beings life, stealing from another being, raping another being, is of course, wrong. This concept seems perfectly rational and black white, on the

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844-1900) was one of the most influential philosophers and intellectual thinkers of the 19th century. He is considered one of the founders of modern existentialism, and his works have influenced various philosophers such as Martin Heidegger and Georges Bataille. His works often ran perpendicular to conventional beliefs of his time, and was received in numerous respects. Nietzsche really did not care who you were, or what it was, he had a criticism on almost everything. Most notably, he criticized Christianity, German cultural beliefs, Democracy, and traditional morality. He caused much controversy to say the least. Nietzsche has often been taken out of context and his literature misinterpreted, most famously