Question #1 The Nevada constitution and the US Constitution each grant or ban certain rights to its citizens, for example, in order for an amendment to be passed the US Constitution relies on two thirds of the Congress and three fourths of the state approval. Furthermore, the Nevada Constitution who only requires the legislative body and approval of the citizens in order for the change to be made. In addition, the state Constitution focuses mainly on limiting powers, rather than granting powers since all appointing official have been established. Finally, unlike the US Constitution who grants power to federal government, the state constitution grants power among their own state thus, protecting the citizens rights and freedom by lawgiving of
It is generally understood that the United States is built upon the principles of democracy, in which the majority consensus of the citizens helps to define the shape of issues or elections. However, in assuming that the Constitution - the document upon which such practices are founded – is inherently democratic is only partially accurate. Indeed, it has been frequently argued that the U. S. Constitution is representative of the rule of law from a federation as opposed to a pure democracy; in a federation, elections occur among the majority of the citizenry but this process results in elected officials who then determine the direction of the country. In short, a federation
The United States Constitution hold the senate as one house and the House of Representatives as the other. On the other hand, the Constitution of Virginia holds one house as the Senate and the other as the House of Delegates. The other branch is the judicial branch. This branch is known as Article three in the United States Constitution and Article six in the Constitution of Virginia. The judicial branch differs in level of courts and justices. In the United States Constitution the article including the judicial branch is very broad, while the article including the judicial branch in the Constitution of Virginia is narrow. The Constitution of Virginia narrowly states how a justice qualifies and how the retirement process occurs once the justice resigns. While the United States Constitution states more about what courts have jurisdiction and how it interprets cases.
The Constitution sets up powers for the State and the National governments. Powers that the national government gets include, regulation of trades, conducting foreign relations, and providing an army and a navy. Some state powers include, setting up local governments, holding elections, and establishing schools (A). One thing that is noticeable is that the national powers are more internationally relate, and the state powers are more in-state related. There are also powers they share which are more powers that have to deal with the whole nation like, taxing people, borrowing money, setting up courts, and making laws.
In addition, each state has their own constitution. Each state constitution is similar to the federal Constitution in that they provide for the organizational structure of the particular state's government, and all contain some measure of a state bill of rights. However, some state constitutions prohibit or limit certain laws or protections that are established in the Constitution.
One way the Constitution guards against tyranny is Federalism. Federalism is the distribution of powers between central government and state government and the powers they share. In Document A it states the powers of the central government. Those powers are they can regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, provide an Army and Navy, declare war, print and coin money p, set up post offices, and make immigration laws. Document A also states the powers of the state government. Those powers are they can set up local governments such as town halls and city halls, hold elections, establish schools, pass marriage and divorce laws and regulate in-state
Both the Texas and the U.S. Constitution have a Bill of Rights, checks and balances, and have divided government via lower and higher powers. The U.S. Constitution was created to give the government power, in contrast the Texas constitution made sure that the main government does not have too much power over the Texas citizens. The founding fathers of the Texas constitution were wary of the government wielding too much power so they wanted to be careful to protect themselves.
The Nevada constitution is the document that governs the citizens of the state of Nevada. In general, state constitutions are usually much longer than the United States constitution and Nevada’s constitution, which was sanctioned in 1864, is one of the state constitutions that fall into that category. When comparing the two, Nevada’s constitution is just short of being twice the length of the United States constitution, but Nevada is still shorter than the constitution of twenty-six other states. The reason Nevada’s constitution has such length is because of the in-depth parts it contains, which are protracted from the provisions of the United States constitution. The reason for Nevada’s constitution having such depth is because of the
National and State governments are organized in similar ways. Both have power derived from the people, three branches of government, checks and balances on political power, individual rights, and federalism. They may seem to have many similarities, but they also have many differences which sets them apart from each other. The Texas Constitution was written to limit the expansion of governmental authority, while the U.S. Constitution was written to act effectively in the public welfare. Over the years, the National government has indeed expanded.
States and national government both had sovereignty from the people and therefore the Constitution could distribute powers between federal government and states but the Constitution was the supreme law
The Constitution is one of the most important document of the United States of America along with the Declaration of Independence. In the Constitution, the founding fathers and the government also included a set of "rights" entitled, The Bill of Rights. In The Bill of Rights, citizens of the U.S. are given rights, amendments, that make the U.S a "free" country today. This system has provided many citizens with rights such as, allowing them to express their religion and free speech and protect their privacy with no officials is allowed to search someone 's belongings unless there is a warrant that states reason. There are many more amendments besides the two listed and each of them are of equal importance to balance the power between the
Constitution are called the Bill of Rights, they outlined the civil liberties as a citizen of the United States. Civil liberties are the restrictions of powers the government has on the citizens. For example, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, no government established religion, and the right to a jury trial are all examples of liberties the government cannot deny its citizens. According to the Supreme Court case Barron v. Baltimore in 1833, none of the provisions in the Bill of Rights applied to the states, they only applied to the federal government and their restrictions (Bowers 43). However, the authors of Nevada’s 1864 constitution included their own Bill of Rights named the Declaration of Rights.
The United States Constitution and Nevada constitution are important for the citizens of Nevada. For many, the first thought of the word constitution is often associated with the United States Constitution. The word constitution is often a document of fundamental principles according to not just the United States, but states, corporations, and organizations. The Nevada constitution is the law that governs the people of Nevada and the United States Constitution applies to all states in the union. Despite them both being constitutions, the United States Constitution and the Nevada constitution have many differences and similarities.
States have always been sensitive about the amount of power they have; the federal government has always had to step carefully around the demands of the states. This has been true since the beginning of the United States. But both believe that they should have the most power when it comes to certain things. Individual states have different values and as such tend to implement different laws about certain topics; such states want their state laws to reflect these individual values instead of a blanket law from the federal government. States should have less power compared to the federal government when implementing laws dealing with topics such as the legalization of marijuana, gay marriage, and abortion.
the founding document of our nation’s laws and government. Within its texts, the Constitution outlines the operations and existence of all three branches of government, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial, as well as their functions and interdependence. The constitution also includes the Bill of Rights, and all other amendments that serve as a basis for any law created in our country at either the federal or state level. While semi-extensive, the main rights we share are those from the bill of rights, which
STATE VS FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS: It should first be noted that state constitutions contain the supreme laws of each state, mostly by detailing the limitations of authority and specific protections for maintaining individual liberty. The US constitution does this too for the federal government and provides the fundamental Bill of Rights that identifies national liberty protections. Many states model their protections on these rights but some add other levels of security. In general, states put a greater emphasis on their legislative branches (where the elected representatives have input) than on the executive branch, though clearly some governors are as visible as is the President of the United States who conducts the daily administrative activities of the federal government.