preview

Nelson-Atkins Museum Of Modern Art Analysis

Good Essays

On a trip to the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, my boyfriend, David, and I strolled through the museum while I, being an art history major, recited to him all that I knew about certain pieces. We observed sculptures by Auguste Rodin, works painted by Georgia O’Keeffe, and busts of Roman leaders. David was enjoying all the artwork until we reached the Contemporary art gallery upon where viewing Mark Rothko’s Untitled No. 11 made in 1963, he shook his head in anger at what he thought was a painting far from a masterpiece. His comment was one I’m sure many have said about this particular piece and many other modern pieces of art, “I could have painted that.” I couldn’t help to reply, “Yeah, but you didn’t.” David’s sudden reaction upon viewing the …show more content…

On buzzfeed.com, a quiz titled “Modern Art or Toddler’s Art?” pokes fun at contemporary art by presenting multiple images in pairs and you guess whether it’s a modern artwork or a painting by a toddler. People, including David, conclude that contemporary paintings aren’t art by comparing paintings like Rothko, Jackson Pollack’s Autumn Rhythm (Number 30) and Piet Mondrian’s Composition with Yellow, Blue, and Red to paintings by Rembrandt, Vermeer, and Caravaggio. If paintings don’t appear to the ideas people have of art then it isn’t art. However, art is no longer what it was five hundred years ago. The masterpiece Judith Beheading Holofernes from 1599 by Caravaggio illustrates the Biblical story of Judith who saved her people by beheading the Assyrian general Holofernes (Caravaggio). Whereas, The Night Watch from 1642 by Rembrandt was commissioned by Captain Barining Cocq (rembrandtpainting.net) and Ruben’s Saint George Battles the Dragon painted between 1605 was commissioned for the Church of San Ambrosia in Genoa according to the Museo Nacional del Prado’s website. These paintings were created to commemorate a significant event or people and in the effect of commissions. As The Art Story states, “modern art represents an evolving set of ideas among a number of painters, sculptors, writers, and performers who - both individually and collectively - sought new approaches to art making.” Artists producing modern …show more content…

11, but is it a good enough reason to spend millions of dollars on one of his paintings? In fact, Rothko’s 1961 painting Orange, Red, Yellow was bought for $86.9 million in May 2012 at Christie’s in New York setting a record for the abstract expressionist painter according to David Ng. However, in 2011, a Cézanne painting, The Card Players sold for $250 million smashing the record for the highest price paid for any artwork sold at auction (Stern). This may seem outrageous to some, but for those who are opulent, “brands are king in fine art. Names like Rothko and Pollock distinguish them from unknown artists the same way the Coke and Pepsi brands distinguish them from other sugar water (Mayyasi).” According to the article “Why is Art Expensive?”, these brands, such as Rothko, Pollock, and Warhol, retain their value and appreciate over time. As someone who does not participate in the lavish art auctions, it’s hard to understand Christie’s $745 million art auction in May of 2013 as anything other than unreasonable. Yet buyers in the art market proclaim these purchases as investments (Mayyasi). On the other hand, in a report entitled “Profit or Pleasure? Exploring the Motivations Behind Treasure Trends”, only a tenth of two thousand wealthy individuals questioned bought art as an investment, whereas, seventy-five percent purchased art to feel victorious at the auction and have cultural

Get Access